MUNGO MacCALLUM. Who is to blame for the last Liberal Party election failure – Turnbull or Nutt.

Malcolm Turnbull will plough ahead pushing the doors marked pull and ignoring the lessons, not just from the last election, but from all the polling since.  

There is an old and wise maxim that a politician should never institute an inquiry unless he knows precisely what the result is going to be.

But there are always exceptions to the rule, and the most intransigent one is when you have suffered an electoral disaster and you feel the need to find a scapegoat.

Normally, the patsy can be identified relatively easily, and disposed of tactfully and, with any luck, quietly. But just occasionally it is no longer possible to heap all the obloquy on just one person: the blame has to be spread around, even among some of those who set up the inquiry in the first place.

When this happens, the imperative is to suppress the damning report, and indeed there is little prospect that anything more than the most bowdlerized version of the probe into what went wrong in the lead up to the debacle of last July was ever supposed to become public.

But this is the faction ridden, strife-torn government of Malcolm Turnbull we are talking about, so the big leak came right on cue – before the dust had settled behind the retreating form of Tony Nutt, the hapless Liberal campaign director who had suddenly found it necessary to move aside for a newer and less tainted regime.

The problem is that Nutt, while obviously one of the most anticipated victims, was not the only one – although we are assured that Andrew Robb and his fellow inquisitors have not actually named names, it is abundantly clear that they were afar from happy with Turnbull himself, his predecessor Tony Abbott, or just about anyone else who had a hand in the cesspit that gave up 14 seats and very nearly lost the government.

And the bad timing wended its way from the past to the future: the report criticized all aspects of the flawed campaign, but made much of the failure of the jobs and growth strategy, underpinned by the promise of corporate tax cuts, just as Turnbull was trying to reboot them.

Having negotiated the reductions for small to medium firms through the senate, it was thought that he would take his winnings and retire – that the cuts for the big end of town would be quietly removed from the table. But not a bit of it: he will plough ahead pushing the doors marked pull and ignoring the lessons, not just from the last election, but from all the polling since.

This is not an idea that has enthused masses – indeed, if anything it has turned them away in droves, confirming the belief well-nourished by Bill Shorten that Turnbull is a rich and powerful man only interested in looking after other rich and powerful men. And as Tony Nutt moves on to become a rich and powerful director of the various companies he has no doubt prepared for his arrival, he might well be the nearest thing to a winner.

He may have been attacked by many of his parliamentary colleagues and implicitly admonished by the Robb report, but so has everyone else. The difference is that Nutt will be crying all the way to the bank. Malcolm Turnbull will have to get back on the horse – even if, it appears, the one he chooses is an increasingly moribund beast.

Mungo MacCallum is a former senior member of the Canberra Press Gallery.

print

This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to MUNGO MacCALLUM. Who is to blame for the last Liberal Party election failure – Turnbull or Nutt.

  1. Jaquix says:

    Sub title of the Robb Report :. “We Are Hopeless” a new 3 word slogan the Party deserves.

  2. Jaquix says:

    And to answer the question in your heading: They ALL are to blame for the last election failure – though it should be noted they did scrape back into power with the one teensy seat, only to get 3 more years of heaping rubbish action or inaction upon us. Voter remorse set in immediately, when people realised what their votes had delivered.
    None of them within the Liberal Party have raised the tiniest voice against anything the divided, chaotic and incompetent LNP cabinet has come up with.

  3. Peter Small says:

    All very well for Andrew Robb to be holier than thou in his critique of the last Federal Election. The decline of the Liberal Party is a direct result of nearly three decades of selecting candidates more in the image of Santamaria than Menzies. In my view it all goes back to the day Robb became Federal Director of the Liberal Party in 1990.

Comments are closed.