ALLAN PATIENCE. Compassionate policy planning as the antidote to populism

The Italian election has shown, very clearly, that ordinary voters are deeply angry with mainstream politicians and political parties. What is true of Italy is also true of Australia. The political class sneeringly dismisses voter anger as “populism”, blindly believe it will evaporate once voters come to their senses. They’re wrong. Anger is mounting exponentially across the country. Voters are looking for alternatives – any alternative – than to vote for the narcissists currently governing us. This poses a serious danger to the political system – but it also offers a golden opportunity for Labor.

 The chasm that now exists between Coalition politicians in Canberra and ordinary voters is vast and yawning ever wider. The arrogance of the government’s increasingly disunited leadership team is breathtaking. Their inflated sense of entitlement is beyond measure. They appear impervious to the suffering they are foisting on resentful citizens whom they label condescendingly as ingrates and “deplorables”, when in fact voters are victims of the government’s deplorable policies. Voters are in open revolt and woe betides the political class that doesn’t take them seriously.

Radical policy responses to this anger and victimhood are urgently needed to assuage voters and bring them back to the politics of stability and trust in their representatives. It is noteworthy that Jeremy Corbyn’s policies in Britain – once written off by the elites as “extreme socialism” and “populist” – are resulting in the British Labour Party rising ever higher in opinion polls. The Tories are terrified of Corbyn. It is increasingly likely that he will be the next British Prime Minister precisely because he is authentically on side with the victims of neoliberalism, in all its ugly forms.

So Labor needs to front up with some bold new policies to convince voters that the party understands that their suffering is absolutely the fault of out-of-touch politicians lording it over us in Canberra. And it’s not just Coalition Tories who are under the illusion they are born to rule. The ALP must develop a comprehensive raft of policies that demonstrate real compassion for the victims of the public policy vandalism imposed on them by arrogant political elites. Boldness must now be Labor’s friend.

The policies a genuinely reforming Labor Party should be contemplating must start with a broadly two-pronged approach to the economy, based on the premise that it is society that the economy serves, not vice versa.

The first prong relates to tax reform. This must be aimed at raising sufficient revenue to support progressive social development right across Australia. This will inevitably mean raising some taxes. However there is plenty of research available to show that Australians will readily – indeed eagerly – agree to increased taxes provided it is clearly spelt out how they will benefit from improved, accessible, well-funded, and well-targeted public services.

At the centre of tax reforms there has to be a wages policy focused on equity and productivity improvements. You won’t get productivity increases while there is gross inequity (such as we have now) between wage and salary earners on the one hand and senior managers on the other. This is not a matter of some silly sloganizing about “class conflict”; it is about sensible economics. And within an intelligently designed wages policy there must be the foundation of a universally guaranteed incomes policy.

These reforms must also include caps and tax penalties on executive pay deals – including closures of tax loopholes which corporations and rich individuals use to offshore their incomes to avoid paying their just share of taxes.  The aim of the tax system must be: (a) to guarantee good public services; and (b) to halt the seriously regressive – and growing – inequality that is undermining the cohesiveness of contemporary Australian society.

The second prong is to establish that the state needs to be deeply engaged in the economy, regulating sensitively while promoting competitive and highly efficient public enterprises, so that competition with private business and professional interests can bring the latter to heel.

This public competition should include a publicly owned bank, a public real estate agency, a public legal service, public GP and medical specialist services, a public energy provider and retailer service, a public transport company (to include air, rail and road services), and a public pharmaceutical company. In addition to providing real competition in the economy, these public enterprises will also provide healthy contributions to public revenues.

It is also time to stop regarding important services like education as a commodity and start seeing it as an investment. The inequality that is structured into our schools and higher education institutions must be ended. Fully reinstating the Gonski Scheme has to be a Labor imperative. And introducing variety into the higher education system is also an urgent priority. We need public TAFE institutes that could run parallel with liberal arts/sciences colleges, providing a rich array of skills and citizenship education before graduates move on to professional degree programs and/or higher degree research. The chaos of the country’s health systems also need to be brought fully under the federal government’s purview. States are increasingly unable, and in a number of instances unwilling, to properly guarantee the wellbeing of their citizens. This should be a signal to Labor that the federal system itself needs a massive reform overhaul.

It’s time, Labor!

Allan Patience is a Melbourne-based academic.


Dr Allan Patience is a Principal Fellow in Political Science in the University of Melbourne where he lectures on Australian foreign policy.

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to ALLAN PATIENCE. Compassionate policy planning as the antidote to populism

  1. Tony Mitchell says:

    Unfortunately, we voters have an appetite for self-delusion, which today right wing populists and demi-gods are better at exploiting. Thus in the face of all evidence, even moderately intelligent people have a propensity to vote against their own self-interest. We deeply want to believe the lies, and perversely, history shows, the bigger the lie, the more readily we believe it. Eg; “Trickle-down economics”; the cause of WW 1 was a fight for freedom; the Third Reich; surrender civil liberties so as to prevent terrorism. The list goes on.

  2. Niall McLaren says:

    ALP Tories. I like it.

  3. paul frijters says:

    I would so love to believe you, Allan, I really do.

    But I don’t. The Tasmanian election, and the Queensland election last year, have shown me the opposite is true: corruption is still rewarded, honesty and a public-good orientation is still punished. The public still believes the myths that accompany the robbery of their purses. Indeed, they can be lead to believe new myths in a surprisingly short space of time, showing that they still want to believe the elites are with them, not working hard against them. So when I hear Bill Shorten is procrastinating on Adani, I see a politician responding to the incentives the electorate put in front of him. When I hear your plea above, I hear what I want to believe, but unfortunately it just ain’t so.

    And your implicit notion that Labour is part of the solution rather than a central and integral part of the problem is more than wishful thinking. It is the same refusal to face facts one just saw in Tasmania and Queensland.

  4. Colin Cook says:

    “The second prong is to establish that the state needs to be deeply engaged in the economy, regulating sensitively while promoting competitive and highly efficient public enterprises, so that competition with private business and professional interests can bring the latter to heel.”
    An admirable idea but quite contrary to one of the core objectives of the Productivity Commission; their website says that a core objective is policing ‘Competitive Neutrality’. They explain:-
    “Competitive neutrality policies aim to promote efficient competition between public and private businesses. Specifically they seek to ensure that Government businesses do not enjoy competitive advantages over their private sector competitors simply by virtue of their public sector ownership.”
    Labor should have a policy to replace the Productivity Commission with a more compassionate body; as I have written elsewhere, a Prosperity Commission!

  5. Mary Tehan says:

    “voters are victims of the government’s deplorable policies” ….. not impressed with Liberal or Labor either at this stage. How many people trust Bill Shorten after he contributed to 2 Labor leadership spills? Labor will only resonate with people if they, themselves, stop using language and approaches about “sustainable, secure employment” that are no longer meaningful or REAL to insecure, exploited, underemployed workers with no prospect of improved lives within reach. Get cracking with renewable energy jobs, plus jobs for upgrading of buildings to 21st century sustainability standards, jobs for new buildings with best practice in low emissions and high sustainability standards, jobs for better and more available public transport, jobs for electric car recharging stations … ending Manus and Nauru detention centres … better city planning for the future … decentralising bureacracies … integrate community health with medical clinics … put dental health onto medicare … slow the immigration and population flow until proper infrastructure is in place FIRST … force compliance of best practice building standards on building developers … ensure employment policies include compassionate leave, and flexibility that strengthens family life for people with family responsibilities etc etc …

Comments are closed.