ANDREW GLIKSON. Daniel Ellsberg and the global nuclear suicide machine

“The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save human way of thinking and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophes.” Albert Einstein 1946

Daniel Ellsberg, former presidential advisor, who had released the famous top-secret Pentagon Papers related to the Viet Nam war, also possessed a cache of top secret documents related to America’s nuclear program in the 1960s. In this new  book “The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner” (5/12/2017) he reveals the contents of those documents, with their shocking relevance for today. It is an insider’s account of the most dangerous arms buildup in the history of the world, whose legacy threatens the very survival of humanity. Ellsberg’s analysis of recent research on nuclear winter shows that even a small nuclear exchange could expand to cause billions of deaths by global nuclear famine.

Much of the nuclear research has been done in secrecy in both the west and east blocs. Few insiders with comprehensive knowledge of the consequences of nuclear detonations have revealed these secrets, the most prominent being Daniel Ellsberg. One of the more alarming parts of the book is the a number of people to whom authority is delegated to pull the trigger on nuclear weapons,. He stated: “With respect to deliberate, authorized US strategic attacks, the system has always been designed to be triggered by a far wider range of events than the public has ever imagined  … Moreover, the hand authorized to pull the trigger on US nuclear forces has never been exclusively that of the president, nor even his highest military officials”. This renders the likelihood of a nuclear exchange significantly greater. Russia has a similar protocol, known as the Dead Hand system delegating authority to retaliate to a US strike in the event that the country’s commanders were taken out. Similar delegations likely exist in other nuclear countries. Consequently the triggering of nuclear war is now in the hands of a large number of people.

Since the first atomic test in Alamogordo, Nevada, 6 August 1945, the global powers have undertaken the construction of a global nuclear suicide machine on a scale that defies human contemplation. The desperate urgency of the existence of thousands of launch-on-warning state nuclear weapons has been grossly underestimated, receiving limited focus in the culpable mainstream media, preoccupied as it is with parochial politics, sport and sex scandals.

Sydney Drell, a physicist and nuclear weapons expert, commented on the proximity of a nuclear exchange in the following terms: “Given all the close calls and mistakes in the 71 years since Hiroshima, he considered it a miracle that no other cities have been destroyed by a nuclear weapon — “it is so far beyond my normal optimism”.

The likelihood of nuclear war has risen due to the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) strategy and launch on warning ,namely use-them-or–lose them strategies, has decreased human control, rendering N-war possible due to computer errors. The fear of losing nuclear assets has driven launch pads to increased mobility, on submarines, trucks and trains, increasing the likelihood of accidental nuclear war.

But the consequences of a nuclear exchange belong to the unthinkable. According to the article titled Nuclear War, Nuclear Winter, and Human Extinction (Starr 2015 – director of the University of Missouri’s Clinical Laboratory Science Program), apart from the immediate destruction by nuclear explosions:

  1. Nuclear firestorms would burn simultaneously over a total land surface area of many thousands or tens of thousands of square miles. These mass fires would release many tens of millions of tons of black carbon soot and smoke which would rise rapidly above cloud level and into the stratosphere;
  2. A nuclear winter would cause most humans and large animals to die from nuclear famine in a mass extinction event similar to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs;
  3. Sunlight would heat the smoke, producing a self-lofting effect that would not only aid the rise of the smoke into the stratosphere but act to keep the smoke in the stratosphere for 10 years or more. Once in the stratosphere, the smoke would rapidly engulf the Earth and form a dense stratospheric smoke layer. The smoke from a war fought with strategic nuclear weapons would quickly prevent up to 70% of sunlight from reaching the surface of the Northern Hemisphere and 35% of sunlight from reaching the surface of the Southern Hemisphere;
  4. Such an enormous loss of warming sunlight would produce Ice Age weather conditions on earth in a matter of weeks. For a period of 1–3 years following the war, temperatures would fall below freezing every day in the central agricultural zones of North America and Eurasia;
  5. Nuclear winter would cause average global surface temperatures to become colder than they were at the height of the last Ice Age. Such extreme cold would eliminate growing seasons for many years, probably for a decade or longer;
  6. Temperatures would be much too cold to grow food, and they would remain this way long enough to cause most humans and animals to starve to death;
  7. Global nuclear famine would result in a setting in which the infrastructure of the combatant nations has been totally destroyed, resulting in massive amounts of chemical and radioactive toxins being released into the biosphere.

An important review of Ellsberg’s book by Scott Ludlam “Nuclear brinkmanship and the doomsday scenario” states among things:

“This work isn’t scary in the conventional sense. It is quietly terrifying. No matter how bad you think the global nuclear weapons complex is, it is worse than you know. Much worse Ellsberg knows this because he helped design it” and “Today, at the highest levels, the doomsday machine is renewing itself. Nuclear weapons states have essentially cast aside the 40-year charade that they intend to honor their disarmament obligations under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This legal instrument has come to serve chiefly for enforcement of a kind of global nuclear apartheid where a tiny handful of states maintain the capacity to commit unthinkable destruction while the great majority of the world’s governments forswear against ever adopting the technology.” … “This, then, is the doomsday machine. Not simply the existence of fission weapons or unspeakably destructive hydrogen bombs, but the whole network rigged together: thousands of them on hair-trigger alert, command and control equipment built in the 1970s and ’80s, millions of lines of antique code sitting on reels of magnetic tape or shuffled around on floppy discs even now. An architecture tended by fallible and deeply institutionalized human beings, some of them with bigger buttons than others. A weapons arsenal premised on the fact that it can never be used, threatened with use every day since 1945, and now costing roughly $100 billion a year globally to maintain and upgrade.”

To date the nuclear-armed nations, and some non-nuclear nations such as Australia, have declined to participate in the ICAN (International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Arms).

The future of the world hangs on a thread.

Andrew Glikson, Earth and paleoclimate scientist

print
This entry was posted in Environment and climate. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to ANDREW GLIKSON. Daniel Ellsberg and the global nuclear suicide machine

  1. Kaylene Emery says:

    Had to read this several times and ‘quietly terrifying’ is such an apt, response phrase.
    Thank you for putting this information into the public forum…..sadly it will not be read by enough people because so much media dross takes precedence – which I think is intended.
    That said it is probable that we, the human species know this on a subliminal level – perhaps this is why our youth are die’ing in droves either by suicide on the instalment….. plan or a more direct route.
    why should they”get a job and get a hair cut”? Any way what Job’s??
    Then they look to us – ‘the grown ups’ listen to those ‘in charge’ God help us……see/feel the hypocrisy and unless they are well supported, well loved and well held – they can only shrug their collective shoulders hang their collective heads as they carry our, shame.
    Kaylene Emery

  2. Rusel Last says:

    The difficulty for those of us who understand this and want to change the world and stop the madness, is that we don’t have enough money. We dont run the banks or the energy industries or the Hedge Funds or Private Equity Firms.
    While these financial capital obsessed structures focus only on profit and trample on the bodies of everybody else to make that profit, they will use their control of the military industrial complex to maintain their position. The profit and power of the Nuclear industry is well understood as Ellsberg demonstrates, and the impotence of Peace Organisations is seen clearly in every political decision across the planet, from Australia’s refusal to acknowledge ICAN’s awarding of the Nobel Peace prize to Israel’s defence of its stolen statehood to China’s Fantasy Island construction.
    It appears that only when sufficient individuals are threatened with death do they rise up on the streets and say no more as we have seen with the Parkland teens and #NeverAgain and #MarchForOurLives. Will they succeed? Can ICAN?
    As the combined stresses of Global Warming, Population increase and Water/Resource Competition increase so all countries will withdraw to their militarised borders and gradually detach themselves from their international social and environmental contracts.
    Meanwhile more and more insightful people will be overcome by despair and withdraw from the world.

  3. Michael Flynn says:

    The threat is real but our global human response is in a fog of unreality – why ? History before 1945 shows many wars with mass movements of hate, fear and killing but then a few realised weapons of mass destruction made mass war ” unthinkable “. The nuke bomb works. The UN Charter is not just words 0f hope. If we give up on conflict resolution without nuclear wars we may see an end to life here in our lifetimes. I fear the US arms makers want to spend on the next generation of nukes to enhance the wealth of the 1 % with a reckless optimism that they will never be used and will keep us safe. I wish this was true. But it is false and scary. The US is beating the drums of war to find an enemy in Russia that makes the big spend possible. Australia is with the US in this fantasy and will fail to support ICAN, to sign and ratify the nuclear ban treaty and to act on the NPT treaty. In my lifetime ( and I am 74) I may see the end of organised human life while my Australian government ( Coalition, ALP, DFAT etc) are inactive in working for human survival. Perhaps our federal MPs will at least ask questions on notice soon.

  4. Andrew Glikson says:

    Dear Kaylene
    I share your feelings.
    I myself am trying only to live one day at a time, as if it is the first day and the last day, although I doubt I am successful in this regard.
    I will never understand how those who promote the nuclear and climate calamities can live with themselves.

  5. Ian Buckley says:

    Andrew,
    Drawing attention to the rising nuclear threat described by Daniel Ellsberg is a truly vital issue, one needing far wider recognition. Of assistance here is former CIA Intelligence Analyst Ray McGovern (US Presidential adviser for 30 years) whose role was to check the reliability of information. (In January 2003, he co-founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) ). One of his great concerns is Trump’s appointment of John Bolton as his National Intelligence Adviser, he pointing to Bolton’s war-promoting record over the decades. For as Undersecretary of State, Bolton, Dick Chaney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and other ‘crazies’ (aided by fake ‘Intelligence’ data) engineered the ‘false flag’ war on Iraq contrary to UN International Law and clear advice from Gen. Brent Scowcroft, (Bush seniors’ national security advisor), UN arms inspectors, etc. Hence another ‘shock and awe’ attack on Iraqi society and its life-support infrastructure, all with tragic outcomes continuing to this day. Unapologetic still, Bolton, who attained US withdrawal from the Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, now aims to scuttle the Iran nuclear weapons agreement, as do Israel and Saudi Arabia as a lead into Iran’s regime change. And that can only mean another horrendous Middle East war likely to go nuclear. No surprise then that when Jimmy Carter was asked about Bolton’s appointment, he told ‘USA Today’ that it “is a disaster for our country.” Likewise, asked what advice he would give Trump on North Korea, Carter said his “first advice” would be to fire Bolton. See, https://consortiumnews.com/2018/04/05/coming-attraction-lunatic-loose-in-west-wing/
    P.S. (April9, 2018) Today we learn that Trump’s intention to leave Syria is replaced by talk of a fresh attack on Syria again accused of a war gas attack said to come from Assad, which unverified claim could well result in a far wider possibly nuclear war! Is this not another contrived ‘false flag’ operation?.

Comments are closed.