BOB CARR. The Best of 2018: How the Israeli Lobby operates.

The letter was in the bulging file marked ‘Premier’s Invites’. The invitation was to an annual dinner where a peace prize was presented to a person chosen by the Sydney Peace Foundation at Sydney University. This year they had decided to present the award to Hanan Ashrawi. I knew her from CNN and had been impressed by her dignity.

I didn’t want another night at an official function, no matter how worthy. Yet in the end I responded to the bugle summons of duty. I felt I had to accept. My thinking was that the Western world must reward those Palestinian leaders who choose a negotiated settlement with Israel. This would cement Palestinian support for a peaceful solution. And that would make Israel more secure, my key concern.

I had been a long-term supporter of Israel. In 1977, as a young trade union official, I had rented a room in the Trades Hall, bought some cask wine and invited Bob Hawke to come along and launch Labor Friends of Israel. I had remained its token president ever since and was always on hand to greet delegations and troop along to the Independence Day celebrations. As a young MP I stood on the back of a truck outside the Entertainment Centre, which was hosting the Bolshoi Ballet, and addressed a small Jewish rally attacking the Soviets for not allowing its Jews to emigrate. The same again, outside the Soviet Consulate in Woollahra.

In 1983 I had visited Israel with a delegation of NSW Labor people and had found it congenial enough, if not a revelation, admirable for its strong labour institutions. We met no Palestinians and were not driven around the occupied West Bank.

For years after, I had made myself available to meet Israeli delegations and visitors, mostly gloomy and dogmatic diplomats, including Mrs Rabin, whose haughty brows arched in contempt as she shrugged off questions about a two-state solution and the welfare of the Palestinians.

I and my Labor crowd were in the Zionist camp. I remember joking with John Wheeldon, a former Labor senator and a minister in the Whitlam government, about our special closeness to Israel—with its craggy old Labour Party in permanent power, its collectivised agriculture kibbutzniks who were Holocaust survivors. I entertained a notion that in retirement I might sign up as a volunteer to talk about the history of the Holocaust to counter Holocaust denial. It seemed to me self-evident that the Jews were in fact an exceptional people who had made a contribution to civilisation well above their numbers. I didn’t dream that in feeding this self-image I might be encouraging a strand of thinking that, among other things, had Jews enjoying a view of themselves as the ‘Chosen People’ and therefore entitled to uncontestable rights to the land God gave them.

The issue of Israeli settlements slowly wormed its way into my consciousness, but not enough to undermine my instinctual support for the Jewish state. Which brings me back to the invitation to present the peace prize to Hanan Ashrawi. I ticked the box to accept the invitation with an air of, ‘yet another official function to keep me away from home … but it’s good for the Jews. My attendance will reward a Palestinian leader who has signed up for a peaceful path to Palestinian statehood. That’s got to be good for Israel.’ The storm of criticism that then occurred was a shock, and—I will develop this point—an insight.

Soon after my participation was announced, Jewish leaders launched an ‘international petition’ to force me to withdraw from the award. Sam Lipski, a prominent member of the Jewish community in Melbourne, denounced Hanan Ashrawi as a Holocaust denier. There was not a shred of evidence, and he was forced to withdraw and apologise. There were threats of funding being withdrawn from Sydney University. Its chancellor, Justice Kim Santow, barred Ashrawi from even appearing in the Great Hall. Letters of protest were dispatched about the awards going to a Palestinian, switchboards set aflame with indignation.

This campaign had two objectives: to see that no Australian politician attended the presentation of the peace prize and that the peace prize be withdrawn.

An article in The Australian suggested that by accepting this invitation I had damaged the federal Labor leadership of Simon Crean and quoted an anonymous member of his staff to that effect.

Just as federal Labor is lifting its game, the NSW premier does this unconscionable thing that sets us back—this was the tone of the story planted by a member of Crean’s staff but not, I am convinced, by Crean himself. The day it appeared I received a call from a former colleague, Laurie Brereton, now serving in the federal parliament, who told me in strong language that I should not back down. He said, ‘This group [he meant the Israel lobby, especially in Melbourne] is used to bullying to get its way…You get nothing by backing off.’

I had already reached the same view as Brereton. If I had backed down it would have sent a melancholic message to all Australians of Arabic or Palestinian background: namely that, through its political clout, the other side—‘the lobby’, ‘the community’—will always crush you. I had given my word I would present this prize (ironically, because in one tiny way it would make a contribution to Israel being more secure). I would not back down.

I have never received more support on any single issue in my time in public life. I was stopped in the street by strangers who said, ‘Congratulations on not backing down’. It was the only controversy I can recall where this continued a month after publicity ceased.

The award dinner was a sell-out full of people from boardroom Sydney, who, I realised, had an instinctive understanding of what had gone on here: a plain bullying attempt to silence a side in the debate as legitimate as its opposite.

This is an edited extract from ‘Me and ‘the lobby’’, a chapter in Bob Carr’s just-published book Run for Your Life (Melbourne University Publishing, 2018).

Bob Carr is a former Australian foreign minister and longest-serving premier of New South Wales. He is Director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney.


This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to BOB CARR. The Best of 2018: How the Israeli Lobby operates.

  1. Michael Flynn says:

    Thank you Bob for your personal story about the peace prize. Readers may know that the prize was the initiative and financial gift of the late Stella Cornelius a great Australian and worker for peace. Stella migrated as a Jew from Russia and is best known for high fashion Cornelius furs. She inspired me to work in conflict resolution and to go to Palestine in 2000 for AUSAid to support the Rule of Law in the education of lawyers.

  2. Rex Williams says:

    Knowing of Bob Carr and the wonderful work he has done to serve the cause of justice for Palestinians over time, I feel sure that the remaining pages of his book ME AND ‘THE LOBBY’ will offer more of his experiences with this group, a collection of people with little in the way on interest in the welfare of Australia but promoting the objectives of ‘Eretz Israel’, by supporting the ownership of all the land from the ‘EUPHRATES TO THE NILE’ and their real and only allegiance, the dominant inhumane regime in Israel.

  3. Jim Kable says:

    I have followed a similar if not politically engaged kind of growth in understanding from assuming that the poor WWII holocaust survivors ought to have a place of refuge – Israel – quaint but emotionally stunting Kibbutz and all – no winder largely abandoned – to a growing awareness (mostly by reading Israeli/Jewish writers by the way) that terrorists – and Zionist ideologues and crooks with all the identifying marks of Nazis have stolen what is more properly called Palestine from the Palestinians. While I clearly understand that many in Israel are themselves trapped by the inhuman treatment meted out by their politicians and forces against the original people – the entrapped Palestinians – that does not excuse the dreadful things being dine – with the support of the US and ye gods – by the current Australian politicians – both sides – as described here by Bob. There is only one solution to this mess that is Israel and that is to return it to its Palestinian owners – houses, land, farms, water and to either live peaceably with them – paying the due compensation and rent henceforth – or to return to their previous ancestral places in (mostly) eastern Europe. Read Israeli academic Shlomo Sands to work out where most of the European Jews come from – not Palestine.

  4. Malcolm Crout says:

    Israel has used the excuse of the Holocaust and centuries of Jewish dispossession to anchor their right to “possess” previously owned Palestinian territory as their “home”. Notwithstanding that in Biblical times they were tribal wanderers, their story has some traction on an emotive level. Their not so subtle ingratiation into business circles has been well recognised for decades. The evidence has been there for anyone who cared to look.

    There exists a parallel with the indefensible position taken by the author and others over the more recent ingratiation of Chinese influence in business, educational and political systems in Australia. China points to the Western destruction of China during the opium wars as some excuse for their behaviour, despite the fact that within China at the time, several conflicts were under way between opposing groups. The difference being the purpose of the West was for profit rather than rule. Even today, Australians are made to feel apologetic by the posturing from both Israel and China, assisted by current and former politicians and business groups.

    Personally, I find this infiltration repugnant and despise anyone supporting the insidious infiltration of foreign interests. It seems business and political people turn a blind eye when it suits their personal agendas, but feel the need to later cleanse their records of questionably treasonous behaviour. Ordinary Australians are not stupid and have very long memories. I hope one day these people will be brought to account for their behaviour.

Comments are closed.