BRUCE THOM. Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and their implications for Australia

 Massive losses in Texas, Florida and across the Caribbean in recent days reminds us again of the capacity of tropical cyclones to wreak havoc.

While they set records for impacts due to wind damage, over-wash, erosion and of course flooding, they are not alone in recent years of demonstrating the power of such events. I visited New Jersey a few months after super-storm Sandy and then before that was Katrina. Historically there have been many disastrous hurricanes along the US east and gulf coasts and countries bordering the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Yet questions continue to be asked about the intensity of these more recent storms given where they hit and the exposure of growing population and infrastructure to their impact. And of course, these are just few places on Earth that have been struck by extreme events with loss of life and property. Destruction and loss of income in India and Bangladesh this past month has impacted many more people that in the USA. Is there a climate change signal in all this?

An article in The Economist of 2 September informs us while the good news is that storms and flooding have caused fewer deaths in recent decades, the bad news is that storms and floods still account for almost three-quarters of weather-related disasters and are becoming more costly. Three times as many people were living in houses threatened by hurricanes in 2010 compared to 1970 and the global cost of such events is rising by 6% per year. And all this is said to be consistent with a warming world, especially warmer seas. Hurricane Harvey gained strength before it made landfall by encountering warmer waters and this is what the models would forecast.

Where does land use planning fit into all this? In the article in The Economist the statement is made that “Houston, which has almost no restrictions on land-use, is an extreme example of what can go wrong”. Buildings are allowed inside 100 year floodplain levels, runoff regulations are poorly enforced, maps are not kept up to date, insurance costs are too low; these all make it difficult to reduce impacts in these low-lying coastal areas. And on the open coast the damaging effect of storm surges just keeps recurring on the barrier islands of the Texas coast and low-lying lands of the eastern US. While there are opportunities for many to prepare for impacts and to evacuate disruption to lives and the regional economies are huge. In all likelihood the climate change driver of warmer atmosphere and sea will continue to provoke these massive extreme events well into the future and so nation states in their trajectory must develop further adaptation strategies to minimise risk and prepare for the next onslaught.

Australia is not immune to these problems. Whether we are dealing with tropical cyclones, east coast lows or Southern Ocean storms, we have seen from past records the way the sea and the atmosphere interact to produce natural disasters. It is that relatively rare but not uncommon coincident occurrence of high seas, high tides, storm surge, and catchment flooding that can be devastating. And the question remains as to our level of preparedness and willingness to take steps to reduce vulnerability to what must occur again and again in future around our coast at places like Busselton, Gippsland Lakes, lower Hunter, Mackay, or Townsville. Our knowledge base has improved; as seen for instance in the OEH NSW Government document (Guideline on modelling the interaction of catchment flooding and oceanic inundation in coastal waterways –PDF 772KB). Then there is recognition of this particular hazard in the new NSW Coastal Management Act 2016 that will require councils to consider development controls in areas likely to be adversely impacted by such coincident events. Governments need to look closely at building codes to improve resilience to wind attack. This will all be helpful, but it is a sad reality that the shock and destructive forces of nature are still likely to be underestimated and require the full operation of our emergency facilities and follow-up services.

Bruce Thom is a Member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists

print

This entry was posted in Environment and climate. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to BRUCE THOM. Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and their implications for Australia

  1. Dog's breakfast says:

    Yeah, that’s Bruce Thom, not Bruce Thorn!

    Professor Thom has been instrumental in getting governments to think and act on the effects on coastal erosion in particular in NSW, and I thank him for his efforts. The Coastal Management Act is as much based on his efforts as anyone.

    Thank you Professor.

  2. Alan Luchetti says:

    Why are so many buildings at high risk insurable? Community rating must be at work, but while that’s ok for health insurance, why should it be allowed to apply to flood insurance? Isn’t it time that government swapped dry land for flood prone land?

  3. paul frijters says:

    The cost of major cyclones in North Queensland include the costs of over-expensive bananas. The last two major cyclones cost consumers around 5 billion, costs which are completely avoidable if only we’d accept the bananas produced by poor Filipino farmers rather than deprive them of a living under false pretenses (biosecurity). I don’t know how high the other costs of cyclones are.

    See http://ftp.iza.org/dp7988.pdf

Comments are closed.