GEOFF DAVIES. The myth of the robust deregulated economy.

The economic ‘reforms’ of the 1980s are supposed to have set Australia up for an unprecedented run of prosperity: 27 years, and counting, without a recession. The economy’s robustness is supposed to have saved us from the Global Financial Crisis. In fact our economy has been unstable, and its performance has been mediocre verging on anaemic. Any appearance of robust prosperity is due to a huge run-up of debt, some direct intervention, high immigration, overwork, selective blindness and over-active imaginations. 

“Just think how the old Australia – the over-regulated, over-protected and inflation-prone Australia – would have coped with the global financial crisis a decade ago”, gushed Tom Switzer of the Centre for Independent Studies in a recent column. Australia made the cover of a recent Economist, and George Megalogenis did a book and a TV series on it.  (I have critiqued Megalogenis’ claims before.) The mantra has been relentless since 1983.

What a shame such a seductive story turns out to be a flimsy confection.

That dreadful “old” Australia, presided over, we should remember, by that pinko Bob Menzies, achieved average annual GDP growth exceeding 5% and unemployment averaging a minuscule 1.3%. Nowadays such numbers are considered impossible, guaranteed to bring on raging inflation, but inflation averaged a moderate 3.3%. The contrast was documented over 20 years ago by Stephen Bell (Ungoverning the Economy, 1997). The post-1983 neoliberal economy has never come close to that performance, with GDP growth around 3%, unemployment rarely below 5% and inflation in the 2-3% range.

Ah, but what about the 1970s, you may be thinking? There was Whitlam, stagflation, global chaos and the disastrous demise of the Keynesian era. Yes, what about them? First of all, the price of oil quadrupled, so of course economies struggled. That’s the stagnation part of stagflation. The US went off the gold standard and tried to pay for its Vietnam war by printing money. That’s a large part of the inflation component of stagflation. If there was a wage-price spiral also contributing to inflation, that was the doing of unions and bosses – it takes two to tango. But you have to count the US contribution to inflation before you lay any remaining blame elsewhere.

It was quite disingenuous of neoliberal campaigners to blame the difficulties of the 1970s on Keynesian management and, locally, Whitlam. As to Whitlam’s much-derided economic management, Australia was the only OECD country to avoid recession in the 1970s too, and the UK and US recessions were severe. So the Whitlam years were not quite the unmitigated disaster they are commonly portrayed as.

What about the alleged stability of the modern economy, its ability to ride-out financial crises? Neoliberal deregulation caused both Australia’s and the world’s worst recessions since the Great Depression.

Banks make most of their money by ‘loaning’ money. (They create the money they ‘loan’ with a few keystrokes, but that’s another story.) When the Hawke-Keating government deregulated Australia’s banks, the banks competed to throw money at ‘entrepreneurs’ – people like Alan Bond and Christopher Skase. There was a huge run-up of private business debt. The economy boomed along with much cheering from the breathless commentariat. But then the debt bubble burst, precipitating the Keating recession of the early 1990s, the worst since the 1930s and a recession we did not have to have.

The deregulated global financial system was also having the odd hiccup. There was the 1987 stock market crash, assorted national crises in Mexico, Russia, Brazil and Argentina, the Asian currency meltdown in 1998 and the dot-com bust in 2001. Meanwhile toxic debt was being spread through the global system by unscrupulous, competing financiers. The bursting of that debt bubble brought on the Global Financial Crisis and the ensuing Great Recession (actually a depression in peripheral Europe and parts of the US).

Australia avoided a GFC recession because the Rudd-Swan Government, uniquely in the world, briefly suspended neoliberalism and spent directly into the economy. Yes, the mining boom helped, but the short-term timing is clear. Christmas 2008 was gloomy everywhere but here.

Australian business and manufacturing have been hollowed out by a shift towards short-termism and financial speculation. The consequences of this were disguised for a long time by a steady rise in private debt, much of it household mortgage debt, as documented for example by Egan and Soos (Bubble Economics, 2014). We were living on our credit card. Since the capacity to increase debt saturated after the GFC our economy has been increasingly anaemic, and a collapse of the debt bubble remains a clear danger.

The weakness has also been disguised by two other factors. First, an increase in working hours. Second, the high immigration rate, which keeps the GDP expanding (just) though the GDP per capita and median incomes stagnate.

It is not a little gob-smacking that neoliberal apologists can (still) look at this history and extract a story of an economy saved by deregulation. Remember, these are the people who didn’t see the GFC coming, for the basic reason that they exclude debt from their models and minds. It is testimony to the power of faith over evidence.

Australia has suffered long-term damage from this grand, misguided experiment in social engineering. Pauline Hanson got her start in the bitter aftermath of the Keating recession (11% unemployment), just as Trump and various fascist movements have risen from the ashes of the GFC.

We are a divided, unhappy nation and society. People know they have been ripped off by the financial class. Young people can’t afford houses and higher education is increasingly out of reach. People are being priced out of their homes. All the ailments of poverty and disaffection are increasing, including scapegoating. The Abbotts and Duttons have found fertile ground for their fear-mongering.

We are relatively fortunate that mainstream Australians’ patience seems at last to be wearing thin and they are rebelling at the ballot box. Resistance is taking more toxic forms in many other nations.

It is insulting to Australians to call this resistance ‘populism’. The neoliberal experiment has been a disastrous failure and people have been slowly waking up to the nonsense they have been fed, for decades.

Dr Geoff Davies is an author, commentator and scientist who has been delving into economics for 20 years.  He is a retired geophysicist at the Australian National University and author of Sack the Economists and Desperately Seeking the Fair Go, and the booklets The Rise and Failure of the Radical Right and The Little Green Economics Book. He blogs at BetterNature Books  http://betternaturebooks.net.au.

print
This entry was posted in Economy. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to GEOFF DAVIES. The myth of the robust deregulated economy.

  1. Rob Stewart says:

    Beautifully written succinct piece Geoff. You’ve condensed many of the highly
    complex and related factors of the history of neoliberalism into a great blog piece. Many learned scholars can’t do it as well in tomes spanning hundreds and hundreds of pages.

    Neoliberalism has been and was always going to be an atrocity. You are so right about the critical juncture of the 1970s and the so called crisis of Keynesianism. The macro shocks occurring then would have rocked any system to its foundations. The possessing superior master class, enraged by the slightly more progressive policies of the New Deal, were waiting for a moment to strike back. Never mind the higher growth rates and overall better economic performance of the trente gloriouses (mid 1940s – 1970s) under Keynesian economics. The architects of the new economic Tyranny had been waiting to strike back since the formation of the Mont Pelerin society in 1947, and it’s offspring. The stagflation crisis of the 1970s provided the perfect opportunity. So ably aided and abetted by lickspittle owned ideologues and “genius academics” like Friedman, Rand, Buchanan, Hayek and Von Mises. Thatcher and Reagan were perfect political instruments for neolberalism’s implementation. The real tragedy at this time was the capitulation of the political left, so willing to sell out its constituency and whore itself for personal gain. The left failed to provide any counter narrative or the fight required. And for the past 40 years the pursed lip, soft, elite ruling class have been taking back everything hard won with blood and sacrifice ever since the industrial revolution. Contrary to emerging consensus I think neoliberalism is far from dead. I actually think it’s just getting started. And it was ever thus. Apologies for the long comment!

  2. Evan Hadkins says:

    Many thanks Geoff. Succinct and well said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.