JOANNE McCARTHY. Bishop breaks ranks on church report into child abuse royal commission (SMH 21/6/2018)

Bishop of Parramatta Vincent Long Van Nguyen has broken ranks with the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference to join reform groups and politicians calling for public release of a church report responding to the child abuse royal commission.  

Keeping the four-volume, 1000-page, church-commissioned Truth Justice and Healing Council report “in-house for any period longer than necessary” is “not in the interest of the kind of church the Pope speaks about”, said Bishop Long in a statement this week.

Pope Francis recently urged all Catholics “not to be afraid of being the central drivers of the transformation that is being demanded today” in the wake of the child sexual abuse tragedy.

The Australian Catholic Bishops Conference said it would “take some time” to consider the TJHC report it received in March, and would formally respond to the royal commission when it had “completed our dialogue with the Holy See” and received advice from an implementation advisory group appointed in May.

On Tuesday, shadow social services minister Jenny Macklin said the TJHC report should be made public because “we need full transparency from the Catholic Church on this issue”, more than six months after the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse released its landmark final report.

More than 60 per cent of abuse allegations to the commission related to Catholic institutions.

Attorney-General Christian Porter responded to questions about the TJHC report by saying the key to protecting future generations was for “all those involved to be open and transparent about what occurred and what is being done to prevent a recurrence”.

State governments and institutions that decide not to accept the commission’s recommendations “should state so and why”, Mr Porter said.

In NSW Parliament on Tuesday, NSW Greens MP and justice spokesperson David Shoebridge, who played a key role in the campaign for a royal commission, lodged a notice of motion calling for the report’s immediate release because “it’s well past time that survivors, victims and their families and supporters saw the Catholic Church’s response”.

“It may be that the TJHC report reflects unfavourably on actions taken by the hierarchy. If that is the case then it’s precisely why it must be released immediately,” Mr Shoebridge said.

The report is understood to have fallen short of unambiguously supporting a royal commission recommendation to scrap confessional protections for priests, but to have backed changes to confession that would avoid a direct clash between the church and governments on the issue.

The report is also understood to have endorsed progressive changes in the Australian church inconsistent with some of the public positions held by its more conservative leaders.

Bishop Long, who was sexually abused by clergy as an adult, told the royal commission in February, 2017 the church needed to “dismantle the old model” of Catholicism and end a “pecking order” that had lay people “right at the bottom of the pyramid”.

In a statement this week he said all Catholics should be involved with the church’s response to the royal commission, including “taking into account the Truth, Justice and Healing Council report”.

On Thursday the organisation representing 150 orders, Catholic Religious Australia, which partnered with the bishops conference to establish the Truth Justice and Healing Council, will meet to discuss its response to the TJHC report for the first time.

CRA member orders only recently received the report. The CRA includes the Mercy Sisters, and Marist, Christian and St John of God Brothers, which were criticised during the royal commission.

Politicians from across the spectrum have signalled increasing impatience with church leadership over the lack of a formal response to the royal commission’s recommendations, while individual bishops have openly opposed moves to scrap confessional protections for priests as recommended by the commission.

South Australian Attorney-General Vickie Chapman urged other state governments to pass legislation scrapping the protection after her state blindsided the church last week by announcing priests would be prosecuted from October 1 for failing to report child sex allegations raised in confession to police.

Acting Archbishop of Adelaide Greg O’Kelly said the church was “unaware of this change” despite the royal commission recommendation and extensive canvassing of the issue with Australian Catholic leaders during a final commission public hearing in February, 2017.

Liberal Western Australian MP and former ward of the state Steve Irons said institutions owed it to victims to publicly respond to the royal commission recommendations “given the scale of evidence” of widespread sexual abuse.

Queensland Labor Senator Claire Moore said the church needed to release the TJHC report.

“I think there is a strong expectation from members of the church, and I am one, that we need transparency . This is an essential element of any healing process, and we really need that,” Senator Moore said.

The Australian Catholic Coalition for Church Reform group, which called for the report to be released in March, said its requests to meet with the bishops conference had been unsuccessful.

Hunter survivor advocate Peter Gogarty said he had little doubt the report was not being released because it reflected views that challenged the bishops.

“Does the Truth Justice and Healing Council deliver some uncomfortable truths to the bishops? Does the report recommend changes to the seal of the confessional, or does it argue that women should have a greater role in the management and direction of the church?” Mr Gogarty said.

In a statement the ACBC acknowledged Pope Francis’ comments on the need for reform “clearly has implications for the Church in any time and place”.

It said the views of church reform groups were “well known and a meeting may not be needed for them to be communicated”.

The ACBC said it proposed to release the TJHC report “when the dialogue within the Conference, with Catholic Religious Australia and with the Holy See, which is under way, is complete”.

In a statement Bishop Long said the Pope’s comments about church reform and a more active involvement by lay Catholics “should serve as an encouragement for the bishops to engage closely and respectfully with the faithful in responding to the child sexual abuse crisis”.

print
This entry was posted in Religion and Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to JOANNE McCARTHY. Bishop breaks ranks on church report into child abuse royal commission (SMH 21/6/2018)

  1. Rosemary O'Grady says:

    I think that some in the hierarchy do ‘get it’, in part, and are busy managing the strategic response. I think it’s true to say they don’t ‘get it’ in the way the rest of the thinking world ‘gets it.’
    In a recently-acquired book about Opus Dei, by one John Allen (I think) – big – in Penguin – I find the kind of thinking which sits well with current responses to current crises: and it outstrips anything so far on the Australian table. The extent of laity and volunteer involvement in Opus Dei is such as to alert the vigilant to what a future RC Church might look like: disciplined, unworldly, successful and utterly bloody-minded.

  2. Michael Byrne says:

    I cannot believe a professional journalist as McCarthy can again repeat the commonly reported statistical error of ” More than 60 per cent of abuse allegations to the commission related to Catholic institutions.”. The 60% relates to Religious Institutions amongst the plethora of institutions, and these comprise 80% of institutions covered by the RC. Within the RI’s serving education of children and adults, the sick and infirmed, homeless and refugees, the Catholic presence is by far the majority, and given the reality of sexual perversion that always has a victim that presence gives context to the statistic.

    It is a shameful reality, as is 1%. But surely we can expect activists to stay true to their pursuit of the truth. Wake up Ms. McCarthy.

  3. Jennifer Anne Herrick says:

    The irony in this is that a Bishop who has been sexually abused as a refugee seminarian by a clerical supervisor but now nevertheless classed as being then an “adult” (meaning simply, irrespective of personal circumstance, being over the chronological age of 17, (when in fact back then it was 21) and which is woefully inadequate as a sweeping description of an adult, but that’s another matter), is the one to call out the ACBC when they and the Royal Commission itself do not recognise that clerical sex with those “beneath them” over 17 is in fact abuse. My case against a high flying SSS cleric was refused by the RC because I was 19and+ despite being female, lay and with a disability. The SSS Order I took to court refused to accept it was abuse, calling it consensual.

    So Long and I similarly fall out of the accepted arbitrary abuse category being over 17. I have met with Long. He is credible and brave. The ACBC and the CRA believe and aggressively fight litigation accordingly, that sex between layers of the hierarchy of the church and with the laity must be and is consensual on the victim’s part and simply a “boundary violation” on the perpetrator’s part, a bit like a footy being deliberately kicked out of bounds in AFL. Misjudgement. Nothing more. No big deal.

    Long is calling out more than the ACBC delay on this report of the TJHC. He’s calling out the whole hierarchical nature of the Catholic Church institutionally. The fact the CRA have only just been given the report by the ACBC shows how this hierarchy works. Bad luck about the laity. They don’t even figure. They’ll get it after it’s been redacted.

    Long understands all this because he’s lived it inside and out and survived to become one of the elite that he knows needs to and must change. Elitism out. Sevanthood in.

    Will it happen? I don’t think so in his or my lifetime. This is crunch time for the Catholic Church. Is it on its knees? Yes absolutely it is. Are the hierarchy? No way. Well not that they’re aware. They, bar Long, are still standing tall and proud, clinging to a thread of sacramental cloth, long worn thin. Long knows this.

    Interesting how personal experience gives one accurate perception.

  4. George Szylkarski says:

    ROYAL Commissioner Bob Atkinson closing address of Royal Commission proceedings on child sexual abuse “Most of the publicity of course related to the churches, but there were many, many institutions where child abuse occurred – in schools, foster care, sporting organisations, in Australian defence forces cadets …, it occurred in detention centres for children,”
    The inconvenient truth is that numbers of institutional sex abuse victims are many times smaller than those violated in a non-institutional and domestic, filial settings. With that background in mind the church report, whatever happens to it, is irrelevant.

    Concentrating on a rivulet of institutional abuse and ignoring the lake of non institutional criminality is to tolerate an injustice comparable to what gave rise to the RC in the first place.
     

  5. Daphne Gonzalvez says:

    Bishop Long has to be commended for his stance.
    Seems the bishops are too afraid to lose their power and privilege.

    What do they not get about Jesus’s love for little children? What do they not get about Christ’s words, “but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.”

    The message I get from the attitude of the bishops is that they do not believe in Christ or his teachings. They do not follow the Holy Father’s instructions! They are afraid of transparency, they are afraid of losing their incredible wealth and power. And for what?

    Let’s hope more bishops show leadership and humility to admit the crimes of the past, recompense those whose lives have been destroyed and do everything to save the children from future abuse.

    • Jennifer Anne Herrick says:

      The irony is that the hierarchy alone no longer have power and authority. This is achieved by them nowadays vicariously in buying the highest legal authority, something I have been up against. It’s formidable, disgraceful and incredible in the true sense of the word. Ironically, vicarious liability is something the hierarchy refuse to accept for their own perpetrators within their system. Good when they need it, not when they don’t.

  6. Jim Kable says:

    It’s time that this Report fell off the back of a truck and into the hands of Joanne McCarthy – all praise and Hallelujahs to Bishop Long Van NGUYEN – for his courage and humanity – out of nasty experience, too, as Joanne notes.

  7. Evan Hadkins says:

    Should the church publish the report? Of course.

    Pollies preaching openness!!! About whistleblower legislation . . .

Comments are closed.