JOHN MENADUE. When will Saudi Arabia be brought to account for its malign influence and promotion of terrorism?

Through its support of extremist Wahabism, the Saudi government has been promoting radical Islam around the world. Its influence has included funding schools, universities and mosques in over 80 countries. But like the issue of the burqa, few Australians want to discuss the highly dangerous activities of the Saudi government.  

 Drawing on earlier posts in Pearls and Irritations by John Tulloh and Peter Rodgers consider a few facts about Wahabism and the Saudi government.

The US State Department’s first representative to Muslim communities worldwide, Farah Pandit wrote in 2015

‘I travelled to 80 countries between 2009 and 2014. … In each place I visited, the Wahhabi was an insidious presence, changing the local sense of identity, displacing historic culturally vibrant forms of Islamic practice and pulling along individuals who were either paid to follow their rules or became their own custodians of the Wahhabi world view. Funding all this was Saudi money which paid for things like text books, mosques, TV stations and the training of imams. ‘

 In an honest moment in 2011, before he was duchessed by the wealth of the Saudis , Donald Trump described Saudi Arabia as ‘The world’s biggest funder of terrorism. Saudi Arabia funnels our petrodollars to fund the terrorists that seek to destroy our people, while the Saudis rely on us to protect them.’ But only a few month ago Trump did a complete somersault in Riyadh and said ‘we will make history again with the opening of a new Global Centre for Combatting Extremist Ideology right here’ Well there you go!

In a closed door speech in October 2013, Hilary Clinton said ‘The Saudis have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on earth over the course of the last 30 years’. In a leaked email from Hilary Clinton in 2014, she said that Qatar and Saudi Arabia ‘are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.’

In late 2015, the Algerian journalist Kamel Douad described Saudi Arabia as ‘an ISIS that has made it’. He noted that Saudi Arabia produced Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 9/11 hijackers that attacked the US, and that it has supplied more foreign fighters to the Islamic State than any country other than Tunisia. A recent report in The Times said Saudi Arabia has contributed more fighters to Daesh than any other country, even Tunisia.

The US Congress was considering a Bill which would have held Saudi Arabia responsible for its role in the 9/11 attacks, but under financial pressure from Saudi Arabia, President Obama threatened to veto the legislation with resultant protection of the Saudi Arabian involvement in 9/11.

Turning more closely to our own region,’The Atlantic in March this year reported

‘Since 1980 Saudi Arabia has devoted millions of dollars to exploiting its strict brand of Islam … to historically tolerant and diverse Indonesia. It has built more than 150 mosques … a huge free university in Jakarta and several Arabic language institutes; supplied more than 100 boarding schools with books and teachers; … brought in preachers and teachers; and disbursed thousands of scholarships for graduate study in Saudi Arabia. All this adds up to a deep network of Saudi influence.’

The Saudi Arabian military which we help supply is inflicting enormous damage with its bombing of Shia in Yemen. Over 10,000 people have been killed with a military bombardment which has wrecked the Yemeni health system.

In all of this there is a disturbing pattern of Saudi Arabia as a major exporter of influence and terrorism.

It is most unlikely that Australia would be immune from this influence. But we do not seem concerned to examine the spread of Wahabism that is so generously funded by the Saudi government.

In the Saturday Paper of 27 June 2015, Philip Dorling, a well-known Australian journalist and writer, raised serious concerns about Saudi influence in Australia. Extracts from that article follow

‘’The leaked Saudi cables(released by WikiLeaks this week) do show that trade, consular support for Saudi students in Australia, and assistance to Australian Muslims undertaking the hajj are day-to-day preoccupations for the kingdom’s well-staffed embassy in Canberra. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade diplomatic list shows that, aside from Ambassador Nabil Mohammed A. Al Saleh, there are 27 Saudi diplomats posted to our national capital, including one member of the Saudi royal family, His Royal Highness Prince Abdulaziz bin Turki bin Badr bin Saud bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, serving in the humble role of a diplomatic attaché.

More significantly, the leaked documents provide evidence that the Saudi embassy is deeply involved in the religious life and politics of Australia’s Islamic communities, with the particular goal of spreading and strengthening their puritanical Wahhabis branch of Sunni Islam. Indeed, Saudi foreign ministry instructions leave little doubt that engagement in Islamic religious affairs and the wider politics of Australia’s Islamic communities are primary tasks for the embassy. The documents show the Sunni kingdom’s strong concern about efforts by Shiite Islamic leaders to engage with the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils and the kingdom’s funding of visits to Australia by Sunni Islamic clerics to counter Shia influence.

Also detailed are efforts to influence the Arab language press in Australia, with the leaked documents including instructions from the Saudi government to its embassy relating to the payment of subsidies, disguised as “subscriptions”, from the Saudi Ministry of Culture and Information to prominent Arabic newspapers in Australia, with reference made to payments totalling $40,000 between four media organisations. Newspapers identified in correspondence referring to payments in 2007 include the influential El Telegraph and The Middle East Times. Material support for community leaders and individuals judged to be supportive of Saudi interests, including at least one New South Wales Labor councillor, also appears to be significant, although it is not possible to make definitive judgements owing to the incomplete nature of the leaked Saudi archive.

The Saudi embassy is further revealed to pay close attention to the activities of Saudi university students studying in Australia, with reports sent to the Mabahith, which also appears to make recommendations in relation to the Saudi government’s large-scale funding of building mosques and supporting Islamic community activities in Australia. Saudi government activity in Australia has extended to large investments in the higher education sector, including through the National Centre of Excellence for Islamic Studies, spanning the University of Melbourne, Griffith University and the University of Western Sydney.

It is a very rare thing for the contemporary archives of a foreign embassy or diplomatic service operating in Australia to be made public. It has only happened twice – once in the case of the Soviet embassy following the 1954 defection of Vladimir Petrov and on the second occasion as a consequence of WikiLeaks’ 2010 publication of US embassy cables. Both cases showed that foreign governments had deep interests in the domestic affairs of this country, keenly interested to gather intelligence and exert influence. WikiLeaks’ “Saudi cables” show that what the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation terms “foreign interference” is certainly not confined to the activities of great powers.

In the course of current debates about Islamic State terrorism, radicalisation and the need for heightened security measures, there should perhaps be some greater attention to who Australia is dealing with overseas and the nature and extent of their activities in this country. But curiously there’s no rush to do that from either side of Australian politics.

The embassy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia did not respond to a request for comment in relation to issues raised in this article.’’

But once more as Philip Dorling said in June 2015 no one in Australia seems to be concerned or in a rush about the world wide malign influence  of the very wealthy,cruel and ruthless regime in Riyadh and its promotion of extreme Wahabism.

We don’t really know much publically about its activities in Australia. How much intelligence and police cooperation is there? Is out cooperation consistent with are struggle against terrorism . Is our cooperation consistent with our human rights obligations? How much are they funding schools and mosques?

We don’t know. But the pattern of Saudi Arabia’s world wide activities gives us reasons for serious concern.

print

This entry was posted in Defence/Security, Human Rights, International Affairs, Religion and Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to JOHN MENADUE. When will Saudi Arabia be brought to account for its malign influence and promotion of terrorism?

  1. michael lacey says:

    Good article John with excellent references to make people seriously worry about this group! They even seem to have Teflon when it comes to the appalling crimes being conducted in Yemen the poorest country in that region!

  2. David Brown says:

    seems to me that Section 44 of the Constitution viz:
    Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power: or….
    shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

    could be construed as attempting to restrict people that are (for whatever reason ?) unduly obedient or protective of the objects of a foreign power from holding political office

    but how is this to be measured… should “joined at the hip”, should accepting orders, commands, hints, intimations emanating from the US, should accepting any donations from people, citizens or whatever associated with governments or countries outside Australia, for instance Saudi, be seen as conferring influence, adherence or whatever be within this ambit ?

    I am keen to read and ponder on the High Courts opinions on these very interesting clauses

  3. Brian Toohey says:

    US no longer needs Saudi oil. no excuse for ignoring the biggest terrorism exporter in the world, especially when it could harm the good progress made in Indonesia since it got rid of the dictator. brian t

  4. Paul Frijters says:

    Hi John,

    two small tid-bits to add:
    1. The close cooperation and strategic alliance between Saudi-Arabia and Israel. Odd bedfellows, one would think, but apparently they both benefit from the same thing for perverse and complex reasons. Its the Israeli alliance that helps protect the Saudis in the US.
    2. I was recently told by a Palestinian intellectual about ghost cities in Saudi Arabia where stateless groups live that are in effect like the Bantustans of old South Africa: people used for cheap labour but otherwise shunned that truly have nowhere else to go but are not citizens of where they live. I don’t know how many of these there are.
    3. The Saudis target the top to fraternise with. They are very careful to groom those they think will rise to the top in the US and the UK, helping them along the way as well. I don’t know if they bother with Australia.

  5. Evan Whitton says:

    Oil covereth a multitude of sins

Comments are closed.