JOHN TULLOH. Shalom! Farewell to the Palestinian state.

When it comes to audacious political chutzpah, few can match Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli prime minister, desperate for re-election this week and anything but assured in the polls, frantically tossed a grenade into the campaign at the last minute. If he keeps his job, he said he would annex Jewish settlements in the West Bank. It would effectively mean the end of the prospect of any meaningful Palestinian state.  

That would be the least of Netanyahu’s worries. He needs to keep his nationalist coalition partners onside. They are opposed to a Palestinian state. They would like to see more land under Israeli control for the country’s long-term security. Netanyahu, eager to surpass David Ben-Gurion as Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, is now only too happy to go along with this.

But annexation would provoke Palestine fury – and more despair – as well as international condemnation. The settlements are illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this. They have proved the greatest barrier to any semblance of a peace settlement which today has become a distant mirage. But Israel has never been too bothered by UN resolutions condemning it or international criticism.

Netanyahu may have become emboldened by President Trump’s decision last month to recognise Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights captured by Israel in 1967. Israel effectively annexed it 1981, a move condemned by the UN Security Council and subsequently ignored by the occupants.

The Palestinians envisaged their independent state as a combination of East Jerusalem (annexed by Israel in 1980), Gaza and the West Bank. But since the takeover of the West Bank by Israel during the 1967 war, 400,000 Jewish settlers have moved in to join the 2.8 million Palestinians and taken over land – the ancient Judea and Samaria – to sink roots anew. Annexation would leave the Palestinians at best with an impossible jigsaw of non-contiguous territories.

Netanyahu is unlikely to get any rebuke from his greatest international supporter, Donald Trump. Their political friendship got off to a flying start when Trump announced he would recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in defiance of international practice. Apart from the Golan announcement and getting tough with Israel’s enemy, Iran, Trump has battered the Palestinians with aid cuts and public scoldings, as the New York Times put it.

The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, was not surprised by the Netanyahu announcement. ‘Israel will continue to brazenly violate international law as long as the international community will continue to reward Israel with impunity, particularly with the Trump administration’s support and endorsement’, he said.

Who knows where all this would leave Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who is supposed to be working on a MidEast peace plan or ‘the deal of the century’ as the president once put it as if it were a marketing concept. During the past 18 months, reporters have been told the unveiling is imminent. But the White House hopelessly underestimated its incubation period as well failing to recognise it was dealing with the ultimate Gordian knot.

At least, Israel can take some satisfaction that its election will be a rare example of Mideast democracy in action even if it means some grasping win-at-all-costs tactics.

FOOTNOTE. Netanyahu may take some satisfaction himself that the intention of his Attorney-General to lay corruption charges against him has yet to proceed. They accuse him of accepting up to $370,000 worth of luxury gifts from wealthy businessmen, including James Packer, and dispensing favours in return. Like Trump with his own troubles, Netanyahu declared it was all a ‘political witch hunt’ and brushed off the charges as baseless.

John Tulloh had a 40-year career in foreign news.

print

This entry was posted in International Affairs. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to JOHN TULLOH. Shalom! Farewell to the Palestinian state.

  1. Hal Duell says:

    There has never been, is not now, nor will ever be a viable “Palestinian” state in the land between the river and the sea. Not while Israel exists, and Israel exists but Palestine doesn’t.
    What we are watching is the latest move in a slow moving, but seemingly unstoppable, progress to a one state solution, and that state is Israel. To pretend otherwise is simply naive.
    Will this latest announcement to further annex a little bit more and then a little bit more of the west bank finally be the spur to create a united opposition to this expanding Israel among the myriad Arab nations in the Middle East? Maybe, but probably not. As Ilhan Omar said, “It’s all about the benjamins…” and there are a lot of benjamins under the Golan. And in the west bank there is lebensraum for the few at the expense of the many.
    I fully expect the move in the Golan and in the west bank to be referred to the UN. Whatever is decided there will be ignored by both Israel and the US/Europe. Groundhog Day.

  2. Rex Williams says:

    “But Israel has never been too bothered by UN resolutions condemning it or international criticism”.

    As above. It beggars belief that the UN us still around as an entity at all.

    The UN Charter has among its objectives
    • Maintaining worldwide peace and security.

    Currently there are more wars and tensions in play or ‘just around the corner’ than ever before, all associated with the middle east, the area that Israel wishes to control and that America is supporting like a corrupted lapdog, which it is, plainly.

    • Developing relations among nations.

    Has it ever been worse than it is right now? There is hardly a climate of friendship anywhere, even among the members of the European Union and through the medium of the US-sponsored European war machine NATO, we see antagonism expanding daily to the very edge of a World War.
    The US is so badly regarded that it is safe to say that the crimes it has committed under the fanciful name of “War on Terror” have never been equalled in history.

    • Fostering cooperation between nations in order to solve economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian international problems.

    A failure in every respect. Few nations show any respect for UN decisions as above, the organisation much more of an international social club than a decision making humanitarian structure. Something of a pathetic joke these days as Israel and the USA totally disregard decisions made by a majority in the General Assembly knowing that their little subservient satellites, such as Australia, will obediently following their dictates and as a result, give the UN the lack of respect it deserves.
    This is the way that it has been for years. Nothing in the forseeable future that will change the current climate.

    It is hard to believe that in this world of great achievements in health, food production, education, but sadly, also military capability as well, the election of one president in one arrogant apathetic country together with a totally ineffective world body like the United Nations and a fascistic, opportunistic country such as Israel, the values that so many have worked towards for decades, can be eroded so quickly.

    What has been stated by the parasitical Netanyahu, that is ‘he would annex Jewish settlements in the West Bank’ to add to the acceptance and political support from his rightwing Knesset members, naturally backed up by over 400 nuclear warheads, (the existence of such weapons ignored by the UN, the USA but not by John F Kennedy), will contribute to a war to end all wars.

    No other option is ‘on the table’.

Comments are closed.