JOSHUA J. McELWEE. In new letter, Benedict blames clergy abuse on sexual revolution, Vatican II theology.

Retired Pope Benedict XVI has published a new letter blaming the continuing Catholic clergy abuse crisis on the sexual revolution, developments in theology following the Second Vatican Council, and modern society’s aversion to speaking about God.

The letter, one of a handful the ex-pontiff has shared publicly since his resignation in 2013, immediately drew criticism from theologians and Vatican watchers. They noted it does not address structural issues that abetted abuse cover-up, or Benedict’s own contested 24-year role as head of the Vatican’s powerful doctrinal office.

The former pope instead points the finger at a range of esoteric issues, from a supposed societal “mental collapse” brought on by the protests of 1968, to a claim that the sexual revolution declared pedophilia to be “allowed and appropriate,” and to “vehement backlashes” by theologians against a 1993 encyclical by Pope John Paul II.

“Among the freedoms that the Revolution of 1968 sought to fight for was … all-out sexual freedom, one which no longer conceded any norms,” Benedict says at the beginning of his text.

“The mental collapse was also linked to a propensity for violence,” the ex-pope continues, claiming: “That is why sex films were no longer allowed on airplanes because violence would break out among the small community of passengers.”

“At the same time, independently of this development, Catholic moral theology suffered a collapse that rendered the Church defenseless against these changes in society,” says Benedict.

A lengthy 5,500-word text, the former pope’s letter was published overnight April 10 by several right-wing Catholic websites, including the EWTN-owned outlets National Catholic Register and Catholic News Agency.

The Vatican press office did not immediately respond to requests to verify the letter’s authenticity, but the city-state’s news portal reported on the text at length, saying it was first written for a German magazine for clergy, Klerusblatt.

Release of the letter comes less than two months after Pope Francis hosted a first-of-its-kind summit in February on clergy abuse with the heads of the world’s Catholic bishops’ conferences and leaders of religious orders.

Francis opened the summit with a promisethat the Catholic Church would be taking up new “concrete and effective measures” to confront clergy sexual abuse. Weeks later, he approvedthe first overarching child protection policy for Vatican city-state.

At the end of his letter, Benedict places the blame for clergy abuse on the lack of appreciation for the role of God in modern society.

After an apparent reference to the famous 1966 Time magazine headline that asked “Is God Dead?”, the former pontiff says: “Western society is a society in which God is absent in the public sphere and has nothing left to offer it.”

“That is why it is a society in which the measure of humanity is increasingly lost,” Benedict continues. “At individual points it becomes suddenly apparent that what is evil and destroys man has become a matter of course.”

“Why did pedophilia reach such proportions?” asks the ex-pope, answering: “Ultimately, the reason is the absence of God.”

A number of noted theologians took to Twitter overnight to criticize Benedict’s take on the root causes of clergy sexual abuse.

Julie Hanlon Rubio, a professor of social ethics at Santa Clara University’s Jesuit School of Theology who was written extensively on sexual morality, called the ex-pope’s analysis “deeply flawed.”

“The willingness to blame a permissive culture and progressive theology for a problem that is internal and structural is stunning,” said Rubio.

Brian Flanagan, an associate professor at Marymount University in Virginia whose most recent book focuses on the church’s need for continual purification, called Benedict’s text “embarrassing.”

“The idea that ecclesial abuse of children was a result of the 1960s, a supposed collapse of moral theology, and ‘conciliarity’ is an embarrassingly wrong explanation for the systemic abuse of children and its coverup,” wrote Flanagan.

Massimo Faggioli, an Italian who teaches at Villanova University and has written extensively on the Second Vatican Council, noted that Benedict did not mention controversial cases like those of Mexican Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, a serial child abuser and rapist who founded the powerful and well-connected Legionaries of Christ.

Benedict investigated Maciel for years before his election as pontiff in 2005, when he was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

But the serial abuser was not removed from ministry until after the death of John Paul II, when Ratzinger was became pope. Francis recently blamedJohn Paul’s inaction on unnamed “filters” at the Vatican who prevented action from being taken against Maciel.

Also unmentioned in Benedict’s letter is disgraced ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick, who John Paul appointed as the bishop of Metuchen, N.J., in 1981, the archbishop of Newark in 1986, the archbishop of Washington in 2000, and made a cardinal in 2001.

Joshua J. McElwee is National Catholic Reporter Vatican correspondent. This NCR article appeared on April 11, 2019.



This post kindly provided to us by one of our many occasional contributors.

This entry was posted in Religion and Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to JOSHUA J. McELWEE. In new letter, Benedict blames clergy abuse on sexual revolution, Vatican II theology.

  1. Rosemary Lynch says:

    Despite Benedict’s dark prognosis, God is still alive, present, and everywhere. Child abuse by clergy happened well before Vatican II. The failures relate to the failure of discernment of vocation, and celibacy. Neither Benedict or his predecessor can stop the movement of Holy Spirit that began in Vatican II, subsequently ruined by pedestrian theologians with their fractured pedestrian English rendering of our liturgy. May the liturgists revolt! Put your love into the texts! Give us words that flow to live with. Translate the deitas of deus. Live!

  2. Iain Stewart says:

    I had thought that Holy Church was fond of rolling stones. (Happy Easter.)

  3. Joan Seymour says:

    A letter like this, written by a man with a fine mind and a rational and cohesive theology, should be worth considering, at least. In fact, I doubt that the Josef Ratzinger who wrote the letter is still that same theologian. He’s an elderly man who is beginning to dement. It comes to many of us. It’s a pity that his friends didn’t step in to prevent this piece of nonsense becoming his legacy. He deserves better.

  4. Rosemary O'Grady says:

    Priceless! A good belly-laugh for Easter/Pesach holiday-reading!
    I particularly embrace paragraph 6 (above) – the collapse of moral theology which ‘rendered the Church defenseless’ – … I was deeply affected, in about 1970, to have been ‘gifted’ as they say nowadays – evading the weight of meaning of the concept – a copy of a monogram prepared for a doctoral thesis at the Gregorian University, Rome : on the topic the difference between the treatment of crime in canon & common law systems. The donor was a rapist and creep who, in my later-considered opinion, probably entered the clergy only as an alternative to having to serve in WWII: unable to object to save his skin, a dissembler, liar and coward.
    I have to remind myself, even now, that the writer, above, is a Pope! reputed to have been an intellectual! yet one who has spent his life instilling Fear into the minds of clerics/writers who have sought to publish Truth… although, how seriously can we accept that sort of reputation (Kung, Schillebeecqs [!!!] et al.) when, as we now know gratis Kieran Tapsell, they ALL (priests) were In the conspiracy to cover-up clerical sexual crimes!
    Since the Reports of the Royal Commission (McClellan, Australia, 2018) we have focussed on crimes against persons – have we forgotten the sensational history of the RCChurch’s criminal/conspiratorial dealings in global money? Contemporaneous? including, necessarily, murder? Aldo Moro’s anniversary comes up in a few weeks’ time… I mean -( timed-out as usual) – words fail me… how can reformists inside the RC Church even begin to talk about renewal and reform when these monumental, oceanic crimes are still swept under the tapestries and the sacramental eyes turned blindside?

    • Rosemary O'Grady says:

      Further to the above – early pars.: he was, also, a leader of men, Father Provincial,teacher, world traveller, linguist, admirer of St Thomas More -also of Karl Rahner SJ ; a publisher of books with titles appealing for wonderful concepts like ‘Truth’; he was at one time cheek-by-jowl with Pedro Arrupe SJ, the admired General of the Society of Jesus worldwide, a confidant, a teacher of laws – sacral and secular, …any number of encomia attached to his name… and that of his family … and STILL do! and THAT is what the prosecution of Crimes is all-about – it’s about: Not-with-standing…

Comments are closed.