KIM WINGEREI. Au dair – it may be legal, but it ain’t right.

From waving Au Pairs through the immigration queue, throwing money at unsuspecting charities and denying medical treatments for children – to ignoring climate change and the bullying culture that is endemic to party politics; what the last few weeks of politics have shown above all, is that our political leaders just don’t know the difference between being right and doing right.

It happens all the time, mates calling mates asking for favours. But when AFL CEO Gillian McLachlan emailed Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton on a Sunday to overturn a decision made by immigration officers he was seeking to use his influence where it didn’t belong. And Dutton used his powers when he should have known better.

To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, “to test a man’s character, give him power”. Both McLachlan and Dutton failed that test. In the case of Dutton, apparently more than once. And as always when these stories come to light, the initial denial of wrongdoing illuminates and reveals. His claim of acting on ‘humanitarian grounds’ beggars belief from a man responsible for supporting the horrors of the offshore refugee camps.

But Dutton will survive and McLachlan will be consumed by the footie finals by the weekend.

Dutton will survive because he has acted within the law despite displaying such poor judgement. Coming straight after the leadership ‘coup’ rest assured that Prime Minister Scott Morrison won’t be getting involved and every effort will be made to make it all go away. And it probably will.

Just like the leadership kerfuffle has conveniently silenced ‘Reef gate’ – the awarding of an unsolicited $433 million grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation.

Both cases show how Executive Government have far too much power to make decisions and spend money without the appropriate checks and balances in place.

Although there may be cases where a minister is required to have executive powers to override the actions of immigration officers acting according to the law, it is impossible to see how that would apply to allowing an Au pair from France into the country. There is no intimation that the immigration officers had not followed the rules, quite the contrary. And even if it was, the appropriate action would be an appeal to a court to deal with.

Indeed I fail to see why the Minister should have such powers at all?

As for the awarding of moneys to a small conservation charity, it was also within the Prime Minister’s (Malcolm Turnbull, remember him?) remit to do so. But why did he have that power? Turnbull claims it was all done ‘transparently’ but so far no explanation has been given as to what that transparency actually entailed. We can only hope that Labor and others continue to pursue this when Parliament returns in a couple of weeks – but without Turnbull to answer questions, that might just fizz out, too – how convenient.

What we do know is that the board of this foundation reads like a who’s who of Australian business – chaired by Dr John Schubert AO who has been on the board of such notable protectors of the environment as Esso and BHP, it also includes Stephen Fitzgerald, who worked with Turnbull at Goldman Sachs and Grant King, a doyen of Australian energy companies.

All exceptionally well connected and influential people who know how to send an email to call in a favour or two.

It’s unlikely that emails played much of a part in the bullying of Liberal MP Julia Banks who decided not to stand for election again – saying she had enough of the toxic culture within her party.

Scott Morrison says all the right things, of course, adding it to the list of things he “has no truck with“. And down south Liberal ‘power broker’ Michael Kroger – a man who is to civil discourse what Henry Kissinger is to ‘peace’ talks – declares that it is all just part of the “cut and thrust” of the game of politics – a sentiment echoed by most of the men offering comment on the matter.

They’re right, of course. But that doesn’t make it right.

Politics should be a means to an end, but to those on the inside it’s too often just a game.

Or to quote Hunter S. Thompson:

The (politics) business is a cruel and shallow money trench,

a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free,

and good men die like dogs.

There’s also a negative side.

Kim Wingerei is a former businessman turned commentator, writer and blogger, author of Why Democracy is Broken – A Blueprint for Change. Follow @ kimwingerei.com.

print

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to KIM WINGEREI. Au dair – it may be legal, but it ain’t right.

  1. Lynne Newington says:

    “to test a man’s character, give him power” is a fair statement.
    It will be interesting to see the outcome of accusations by his former mate and colleague who wouldn’t be so stupid as to have no evidence to his claims, he’s been well greased in political life.

  2. Simon Warriner says:

    What did anyone really expect? We have been conditioned to expect great things from people whose foundation act in public political life is to accept that they will conflict the interests of those they claim to represent with the interests of the party they belong to and it’s sponsors.

    Right there is the cause of the problem. That acceptance of conflicted interests is a flaw. A flaw that is brought to every decision made thereafter.

    We are electing people wholly unsuited to leadership roles and then expecting them to provide useful leadership.

    More fool us.

    The voters can fix this. Simply stop voting for party politicians

Leave a Reply

Comments will not be considered unless you provide your first and last names, and we will not publish your email address. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.