KIM WINGEREI. The Particracy Rules!

If this week of political machinations, tactical manouverings and partisan grandstanding hasn’t proved beyond doubt what the real problem with our democracy is, I don’t know what will. We don’t live in a democracy, we live in a particracy.  

It is hard to pick the worst example, but Scott Morrison declaring that he would do “whatever it takes” to avoid losing a Parliamentary vote is right up there. The result was that he and his colleagues managed yet again to deny refugees on Manus and Nauru humane treatment.

People don’t matter – politics is more important.

Policy doesn’t matter much, either, politics always takes precedence.

And it wasn’t just Morrison and his band of incompetent brothers (and the odd sister), Labor did their fair share of politicking, too. Horse trading with the outrageous electronic surveillance bill to where it passed just so Labor wouldn’t be seen to be obstructionist in the perceived matter of national security.

It all added up to a week in Parliament where the only “achievement” was the Government getting a flawed and unworkable surveillance bill passed with some amendments. The refugees are still in limbo, no progress was made on energy policy and our country remains poorly governed by a bunch of Ministers and back-benchers who are now only interested in holding on to save their jobs, hoping for a miracle between now and May 2019.

As the economy is slowing and the share-market is threatening the implosion many say is overdue, it is hard to see what “miracle” that might be. A perceived terror threat or an actual event – engineered (remember the children overboard affair?), or – God forbid – an unexpected tragedy on which the Government can score political points – Morrison no doubt hankers for a “Tampa” style episode.

Because politics is all about point scoring, and party politics is about winning – not just elections, but winning a debate and a vote in Parliament is an end in itself. People are just voters and policy is merely a bi-product of the politics.

Maybe it is the inevitable consequence of allowing the political party to usurp control over democracy? In ‘modern’ democracy all important policy decisions are made in the party room. Parliament is merely a place of perfunctory debate and where predetermined votes are being held. Grandstanding and shouting matches define the political discourse, not respectful and informed debate.

As voters, the only choice we have is to either vote for an independent who have limited influence except in a “hung” Parliament, or vote for a party delegate whose influence is limited by the party program and enforced by the party whip. This has to change – we need to re-frame the role of the political party.

We need to return to the original idea of democracy as government by the people with our representatives beholden to their constituents, not to their party – where being a representative is a privilege and an immense responsibility, not just a career choice.

I have no doubt that there are many of our Parliamentarians that see it as such, but too many see their role as one of earned entitlement as they move up the ranks of the party hierarchy. Too many have spent their whole career as politicians. Too many pander to donors, mates and special interest groups.

One solution is more direct democracy – once too daunting to contemplate but now well within the realm of possibility using modern communications methods and technology (properly encrypted). Maybe that is an utopia worth striving for.

In the meantime, let’s open the debate to what can be done to change the particracy back to a democracy.

Kim Wingerei is a former businessman, turned writer, blogger and commentator; passionate about free speech, democracy and the politics of change. Author of “Why Democracy is Broken – A Blueprint for Change”. Follow @ kimwingerei.com or on Facebook.

print

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to KIM WINGEREI. The Particracy Rules!

  1. Con Karavas says:

    “ This has to change – we need to re-frame the role of the political party.”

    That is for sure Kim.

    Few, if any, political parties act primarily in the interests of the people. Insightful that our founding fathers didn’t mention them in our Constitution.

    Now, to add insult to injury, a political party, that is, a private entity, has closed our Parliament before question time and a break (23 April 18) and later limited the sitting days of our Parliament when it reopens in 2019 (news.com 28 Nov 18), made secret private deals with corporations for ideological and personal gain and in the past taken us to wars of aggression.

    This must change.

    We should be ashamed that we are 13th on Transparency International’s corruption list.

    To improve our democracy, while it will be energetically opposed, it is not a complex process. We must first scrap the freedom of information statutes, remove statutory threats to journalists and within a week of a bill being passed made public all submissions from govt depts, corporations, lobbyists and others to MPs and Senators, plus donations to political parties should be made available immediately.

    Commercial-in-confidence should not be an excuse for secrecy when dealing with our Government. If a company doesn’t want its dealings and/or expressed views on trade etc known, (after it has secured contracts) then it shouldn’t deal with the Government, that is, the citizens of Australia.

    While I think your description, particracy is not bad, I think in the past 20 years, kakistocracy is a more fitting description. Harsh on the few who understand that they in Parliament to represent the views of their electorate and not their personal or party views. However while the many vote against the people’s views, I think kakistocracy is kinder than branding them narcissistic megalomaniacs.

    Yes Kim, direct democracy and I would add transparency are now doable.

  2. Di Barry says:

    I agree entirely. We need to cut the power of the two major party blocs and career politicians.
    Some changes to consider: politicians can only serve a maximum of two terms,ministerial advisers should be banned, their salaries should be halved and expenses limited, all positions in the public service should be permanent including heads of department and the capital city should be regulaly movted around and the first three or four choices should be as far away from Sydney as possible.
    The major parties haven’t worked out that we are sick to death of their machinations.

  3. Di Barry says:

    I agree entirely. We need to cut the power of the two major party blocs and career politicians.
    Some changes to consider: politicians can only serve a maximum of two terms,ministerial advisers should be banned, their salaries should be halved and expenses limited, all positions in the public service should be permanent including heads of department and the capital city should be regulaly moved around and the first three or four choices should be as far away from Sydney as possible.
    The major parties haven’t worked out that we are sick to death of their machinations.

    • Kim Wingerei says:

      Thanks Di, limited tenure and fixed terms are a must. And instead of professional politicians we should have professionals in executive government!
      I like your idea about moving the capital city around – one of so many things that is now easy to do, yet we are stuck in century old paradigms of how things “should” be.

  4. Evan Hadkins says:

    I think it requires the inclusion of new structures – like citizen juries.

Comments are closed.