MARGARET REYNOLDS.  New opportunity for Code of  Race Ethics supported by 54% of the Australian Parliament in 1998.

Senator Penny Wong considers today’s politicians  have failed to isolate  the extremism of One Nation as effectively as in the 1990s.

Perhaps a contributing factor is that few political leaders  have any interest in the history of their profession, because their focus is too often on the next opinion poll or election.
Back in 1996,  many Australians were shocked when  parliamentary newcomer Pauline Hanson used her first speech to launch an attack on Asian immigration. Media and political comment was loud and intense ,but a lesser known initiative  in response  to her intemperate rant was the Federal Parliamentarians Code Of Race Ethics , which had the potential to be an effective  tool in combatting hate speech.

Yet for twenty years  successive parliamentary leaders were oblivious to its existence until October 2016 when Shadow Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus resurrected the almost forgotten Code of Race Ethics to be signed by all members of the Labor Caucus that year .
This week Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has written to the Prime Minister urging him to also see this Code as an important  way to tackle racism  in the parliament and the community.

It is significant that the Code of Race Ethics was developed as a result of a complaint brought by the Ipswich indigenous community in 1996 when their newly elected Member of  Parliament announced she would not represent them or their issues. This was unprecedented for an MP to publicly refuse to work with a group of constituents .
As a result a delegation of Ipswich elders went to Canberra calling for Parliamentarians to “represent all of their constituents without racial discrimination, fear or favour “

The issue was debated in the Senate in May 1996 and a unanimous motion led to a Code of Race Ethics being developed by Senators Reynolds (Labor ) and Woodley (Democrat ).

Over the next few months various consultations were held with Parliamentarians and with community groups. There was no precedent for such a document  but the final Code of Race Ethics  was influenced by “Politicians and Citizens Roles and Responsibilities” (John  Warhurst,1995 ) and “Code of Practice for Parliamentarians “(Kevin Rizzoli 1991 )

The  eight principles of the Federal Parliamentarians Code of Race Ethics  includes respect for religious and cultural belief of all groups living within Australia in accordance with the United Declaration of Human Rights . Parliamentarians commit  “to speak and  write in a manner which provides factual commentary on a foundation of truth.”

The Code recognises and values diversity as an integral part of Australia’s social and economic future.

In 1996  there was political resistance to the Code of Race Ethics being passed by either the Senate or the House  of Representatives, but over several months  a large number of individual elected members officially endorsed the Code, including then Deputy Prime Minister , Tim Fischer, Brendan Nelson, Marise Payne and several other prominent  members of the Coalition  Government.

A majority of Labor Opposition Members and Senators  committed to the  Code .
The Code was also debated in some state parliaments and a majority of Labor and Liberal leaders of the time  became signatories.

In Tasmania the Code was enshrined in Standing Orders of the House of Assembly.

In December 1996 the Australian Council of Churches hosted an event in Canberra’s Parliament House where Church Leaders came together with community organisations and Parliamentarians to endorse the need for the Code of Race Ethics.
Father Frank Brennan  addressed the audience  reminding everyone that   “ this voluntary code does not place any limit on freedom of speech but is a democratic enhancement of it “

In  September 1998 there were 1435 candidates for the Federal Election  and all candidates  received a copy of the Code of Race Ethics suggesting that as potential elected members or senators they consider becoming signatories and 553 did so .

The newly elected parliament of 1998 included 121 Members and Senators  who had given a commitment to abide by the Code of Race Ethics.

At the time it was stated: “ as Parliamentarians approach a new century ,we will be addressing significant issues relating to multiculturalism, reconciliation and Australia’s place in the Asia Pacific region so by the Centenary of Federation there should be 100% of Parliamentarians committed to this code.”

Unfortunately interest and commitment  to the Code of Race Ethics lapsed for twenty years , but it is good to know that a substantial number of Labor parliamentarians in the  May election are already signed on to support its principles.

There is still time for the Prime Minister to take up this initiative and ensure the potential strength of an all-party Australian Code of Race Ethics becomes a national statement, which could start to repair the damage racism in our parliament has created in our communities.

Margaret Reynolds was Labor Senator for Queensland 1983- 1999

print
This entry was posted in Politics, Refugees, Immigration. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to MARGARET REYNOLDS.  New opportunity for Code of  Race Ethics supported by 54% of the Australian Parliament in 1998.

  1. Kien Choong says:

    Hi, thank you for this interesting article. But I’m not clear on what the Code of Race Ethics content is, and how it will help combat hate speech. Is the Code at least drafted in a way so that we can decide whether a speech by Senator Anning (for example) is a hate speech? And if so, are there any consequences other than opprobrium?

    Just wondering!

  2. Ted Egan says:

    Well done Margaret and your part in the above is not forgotten. The inherent problem is that Pauline Hanson’s popularity will be enhanced by all of the recent events, despite her brainless offsiders getting on the sauce and showing us just how gullible they are. Watch the primary vote she is able to score for her candidates. She is a reminder that the Nazis started thus in the 1930s. Support for a populist leader was provided by a propaganda machine able to take the smartest people in the word into believing that they had worthy policies.

  3. Evan Hadkins says:

    “Perhaps a contributing factor . . . ” is both sides of politics shaping their policy to suit racists.

Comments are closed.