MICHAEL KELLY SJ The biggest con in any current debate in Australian public life

In a highly contested event, one political con over the last decade stands out as the greatest bipartisan piece of deception in any enduring debate: the obfuscation employed in the public arguments over asylum seeker arrivals in Australia.

Public attention and a great deal of grief laden anxiety has focused on the public disgrace of Australia’s handling of asylum seekers left for years on Manus and Nauru Islands in the Pacific. This has all been explained to us as being necessary to “stop the boats” as our hand-wringing politicians on both sides of the Parliament tell us that their real concern is to prevent deaths at sea as desperate people make a run for a better future.

Or the “hard men”, though they aren’t all men, tell us the electorate is in panic because of the feared invasion of queue-jumping asylum seekers coming by boat to Australia’s shores in search of refuge. An exaggerated account of the threat posed by asylum seekers landing by boat has been agreed to be a taken-for-granted assumption for both Labor and the Coalition.

Now, thanks to the work of Abul Rivzi here in Pearls and Irritations https://johnmenadue.com/abul-rizvi-dutton-sets-new-asylum-seeker-application-record-2/ the reality of what’s going on has come to light. The sham of it all has been reiterated in all its clarity by Michael Pascoe drawing on Rivzi’s revelations https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2018/12/09/record-number-asylum-seekers-peter-dutton/

None of us should be surprised by what’s happening in our world. People movement is historically a human constant and through all of our history, Australia has been a beneficiary of migration but especially of refugee arrivals. Yet in the last decade we’ve lost our taste for responding to the constant and inevitable facts of life on this planet and even created a department named to state just where we’ve reached: Border Protection.

Migration and refugee intake used to be part of what our program began as: nation building. That’s out the door now and the Department is officially committed to maintaining an immigration policy that defends our security requirements first and foremost.

The political farce that now prevails has been a long time in the making. Australia’s first chance to get it right was in the last decade: the plan to come to an arrangement to settle some illegals in Malaysia during the Rudd Government’s tenure.

See also ‘John Menadue and Peter Hughes. Slogans versus facts on boat arrivals. Part 1‘ and ‘Part 2‘.

That was scuttled when Tony Abbott displayed his only political talent – to oppose – and he managed to thwart the resettlement of some asylum seekers in Malaysia apparently on a matter of high principle – that since Malaysia was not a signatory to the UN Conventions on refugees and asylum seekers and so they couldn’t be trusted to take our load.

The Greens dutifully complied with the Coalition’s moral misgivings and appeal to high principle and the plan was ditched. That’s where Rudd’s appalling and enduring “Pacific solution” (to what you might ask?) got its kick off. And look what that’s delivered!

The Coalition then introduced the reign of Morrison and Dutton. Leaving the former’s crocodile tears about children in our Pacific Gulags to one side and completely ignoring what a dill Peter Dutton is, let’s just go beneath the facts as shown by Rizvi and Pascoe.

The “stop the boats” mantra from Abbott was, as any amount of data demonstrates, predicated on a lie. The boats had stopped from Rudd and Gillard on. Why? Because their governments worked with the Indonesians diplomatically to thwart the people smugglers.

But smart and ruthless business people that they are, the smugglers changed tactics. They stopped helping people onto boats and arranged airline tickets.

And I can say from personal experience that the dills managing this catastrophe knew it all five years ago. I have been advocating for a group of desperate refugees in Bangkok for at least five years and to little effect.

When Abbott was Prime Minister, I approached him personally about helping this group of forlorn Pakistani Christians fleeing the alarming dysfunction of their own failed State that landed them in fear of their lives in Bangkok, seeking to avoid death at the hands of Islamic extremists in Pakistan.

Abbott shuffled me off to the Minister responsible for refugee resettlement, Senator Connie Fierravanti-Wells. A plainly manipulative Italian Australian Catholic, she assured “Father” of how much she cared about refugees and just about anyone. She did nothing of course.

But in the course of the conversation told me her biggest challenge – this is four years ago – was processing 50,000 illegals already on shore! And that was early 2015!

The latest figures only compound how large the problem is and how hopeless its management has been.

Lurking behind the incompetence of the politicians is something even more destructive: the administration of the Department which has been denuded of capacity while it has been in the hands of a single and notably underachieving but nevertheless consistently engaged Secretary: Michael Pezzullo.

This has all happened on his watch. He must get the prize for the best upwards manager in the Federal public service. No catastrophe disturbs his steady hold on the leadership of the Department. No evidence – such as the latest kerfuffle about outsourcing visa functions to the inappropriate because downsizing the Department has led to processing chaos – ever dissuades his Ministerial betters from holding him accountable for the mess he’s got Australian migration and refugee intake into.

And still the con continues. We obsess about Manus and Nauru and exploit the people there for political effect. We just ignore the mess that incompetent Ministers and hopeless bureaucrats have created.

Why is there a mess? Too many people who don’t know what they don’t know, a Minister who brings all the competence of a Queensland policeman to a complex portfolio and the service he gets from senior staff who seem to only know how to manage upwards.

If it weren’t so tragic, it would make a script for a great episode of Yes Minister!

So what’s the way out? It really takes a Minster to do what Paul Keating did about the Australian economy when he derided it as full of just “copper wire telcos and rust bucket industries”. He spent at least five years giving weekly seminars through press conferences that educated Australians about our prospects if we didn’t change: the “Pacific peso” for our currency and a “banana republic” for our political economy.

This time we need information and education. Not fear and fakery.

Will the next government deliver that? I don’t see any Paul Keating in immigration around the place.

print

This entry was posted in Refugees, Immigration. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to MICHAEL KELLY SJ The biggest con in any current debate in Australian public life

  1. Eileen Hayes says:

    Thanks for the clarity of this article. We know these facts but Coalition and media have been relentless in demonising asylum seekers and refugees and we have no political leader in Labor prepared to make a stand in their defence. It is all shameful.

  2. tasi timor says:

    ‘The boats had stopped from Rudd and Gillard on. Why? Because their governments worked with the Indonesians diplomatically to thwart the people smugglers.’

    Misleading.

    Momentum had slowed due to disruption, deterrence and jailing of people smuggling crews in Australia, depriving syndicates of crew from their very few source villages and deterring potential sources. The Gillard Govt blithely wrecked everything when Roxon decided to clear the jails and repatriate smuggling crews. Interestingly, smugglers already knew this was going to happen, informed by Australian lawyers and their clients. This might have passed for ‘diplomacy’ Gillard style. Momentum immediately returned and new sources of crew opened up, no longer deterred by the prospect of lengthy jail time. Rudd’s ‘no settlement in Australia’ statement immediately deterred the large and growing Iranian cohort, stopped before OSB commenced. None of this was due to co-operation with Jakarta.

    Diplomacy prior to OSB resulted in AFP and POLRI being tasked to co-operate on a new level, and a new POLRI taskforce became operational. They were based in Jakarta and were reluctant to travel out of their comfort zone. None of the important Indonesian smugglers were arrested – they continued to be protected and the weeks before the Australian election saw a surge of boats, particularly from Sulawesi. With the election of a new coalition Govt intercepted asylum seekers were occasionally handed over at sea from Navy to Indonesian Customs and SAR vessels for return to Indonesia. New PM Abbott reset the trajectory of our diplomacy when he publicly assured Jakarta his Govt wouldn’t allow Papuan separatists a base in Australia and the prospects for further incremental cooperation looked good. Until the publication of Snowden’s stolen document changed the game.

  3. Peter Johnstone says:

    Thanks, Mick – good to see a frank assessment of the political misrepresentations.

  4. Tony Mitchell says:

    Thanks Father Michael, Abul Rivzi and Michael Pascoe for these insights into the realities of our dishonest immigration policies.

    The misguided compliance of Labour on refugee policy over this depressing decade has been shameful. And now even financially, we have discovered that the arrogant Pezzullo has managed to overspend the “Border Security” departmental budget by $ 350,000,000 – so far this year, and essential services have to be cut ! ( Don’t hold your breath waiting for media coverage of this latest Dutton disaster)

    We can only hope that with the influence of the Greens, together with the newly elected Karen Phelps plus other independents – will result in this quite irrational, immoral policy being reversed by the new government.

  5. Kien Choong says:

    I agree the case for migration and for giving refuge to asylum seekers has (and can) be substantiated with reasoned arguments.

  6. mark elliott says:

    the whole of our political, and social system,is a crock of shit.howard lit an easy fuse and the oz people lapped it up.we are “horrified”about mannus etc, but more turn up for the melbourne cup than to march against an absolutely corrupt political system. all sides!!!!

Comments are closed.