MUNGO MACCALLUM. Turnbull spooked into wrong strategy

Let’s cut to the chase: whatever the optimists in the ALP may imagine, there is almost no chance of Kristina Keneally beating John Alexander in the Bennelong by-election.

Keneally is a well-known, serious, sensible, convincing and personable politician and under normal circumstances would be an ideal candidate for a marginal seat in a normal by-election – the kind of by-election in which the incumbent declares that he has to desert his constituents because he needs to spend more time with his family, whether he has one or not.

But these are nor normal circumstances – the long running debacle over dual citizenship has left the voters confused and resentful.  However they are not likely to take their anger out on Alexander, nor for that matter Barnaby Joyce whom they regard as dinkum Aussies, whatever the bloody High Court might think. True, Alexander’s very belated admission of his ignorance over his ancestry was more than somewhat negligent, but what the hell – the man played tennis for Australia, so most, if not all, can be forgiven.

There will certainly be a swing against him, but it should be less than the almost 10 percent buffer he maintains it will be the fault of the very unpopular government he represents, and as long as it is not about him there should be very little to worry about.

Very little, but enough to spook a Prime Minister and his troops into precisely the wrong strategy – a ferocious smear against Keneally’s past rather than an endorsement of Alexander’s future.

As New South Wales Premier, Keneally was given a hospital pass by a demoralized party long past its political use-by date and she was supported by some very unsavoury characters in the process. But the worst that can be thrown against her is naivete; indeed the ICAC, which was eviscerating Eddie Obeid, Joe Tripodi and Ian Macdonald, actually sent her a herogram.

For the likes of Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop and the rest of the gang (who, let’s face it, have some pretty unlovable characters among their own troops) to leap into the cesspool looks more desperate than statesmanlike. In the present febrile atmosphere it risks a backlash which just might push Keneally over the line.

Highly unlikely, as I have said, but at the very least her candidature will be yet another distraction for a prime minister who has had quite enough of them in a year he would like to forget as soon as possible. On that level alone it has to be called a win for Bill Shorten and Labor.

The history of attempts to install star candidates in all parties is a mixed one; there have been some successes, albeit often short-lived, but there have been some spectacular crashes and burns. But then there is one moment that Labor will never forget: the glorious victory in Bennelong itself in 2007, when Maxine McHugh prevailed over the incumbent prime minister John Howard, and her supporters flashed the message through to party HQ: “Fully flushed!”

Shorten would love to have a reprise of that result. He probably won’t get it. But he and Keneally have already given Turnbull an awful fright, so the idea was worthwhile anyway.

 

print
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to MUNGO MACCALLUM. Turnbull spooked into wrong strategy

  1. Peter Small says:

    Yes Mungo, Turnbull is not pretty under pressure. Which is precisely what Laurie Oaks predicted when he was elected leader.
    As the Greek philosopher 480 to 406, Euripides said “Whom the Gods would destroy they first make mad”
    Of course I think the Greeks had a different God to the one who opposes same sex marriage!

  2. John CARMODY says:

    Mr Alexander may be “famous” and a “dinkum Aussie” to white males of my and Mungo McCallum’s age, but I seriously doubt that it cuts much ice with the large number of East Asian people who currently live in Bennelong (most of whom were not born nor resident in Australia in John Alexaneder’s tennis hay-day).

    I can’t guess (any more than McCallum can) how they will respond to the current political conditions, specifically in their electorate. If they believe that he has done “good things” for Bennelong (and, not living there, I have no meaningful idea) then — given the likelihood of a serious Coalition loss at the next General Election (whether in 2018 — highly likely — on in 2019) he won’t be in a position to do that “service” from Opposition. So their thinking might be “Why not dispose of him now?”

    Yes, in her days in the NSW Parliament, Kristina Keneally did have some “unsavoury” colleagues but, in politics one has to operate with the hand which the electors “deal”; it is different in business, where one can choose one’s associates. So perhaps the electors and Malcolm Turnbull might ask Arthur Sinodinos about HIS associations with those same “unsavoury” people.

    A win might be a bonus for the ALP after the “scare” which the Liberals — and their increasing powerful fundamentalist Catholic and Protestant allies — might receive in Bennelong.

Comments are closed.