Subscribe to our weekly and daily Pearls and Irritations newsletter!
Most viewed recently
- JOHN MENADUE. Ignore the planet and our grand children at our peril.
- MUNGO MACCALLUM. Morrison actually does something.
- MUNGO MACCALLUM. Turnbull’s cronies.
- EMMA ALBERICI. There’s no case for a corporate tax cut when one in five of Australia’s top companies don’t pay it.
- MICHELLE FAHY. Invictus Games, glossing over inconvenient truths-the arms trade and the British royals
- JOHN MENADUE. Wentworth wipe-out! 22 October 2018
- MUNGO MACCALLUM. A fairy story. 22 October 2018
- ROGER SCOTT. Wentworth byelection – tale of two (other) cities. 22 October 2018
- KIM WINGEREI. An Australian Spring 22 October 2018
- JACK WATERFORD. Morrison lacks whatever it takes. 22 October 2018
- Arts and Reviews (40)
- Defence/Security (822)
- Drug Reform (22)
- Economy (1,130)
- Education (222)
- Environment and climate (389)
- Health (542)
- Housing (75)
- Human Rights (423)
- Indigenous affairs (70)
- Industrial relations (34)
- Infrastructure (174)
- International Affairs (1,684)
- Asia (259)
- Links (10)
- Media (548)
- NBN (74)
- Politics (2,677)
- Refugees, Immigration (577)
- Religion and Faith (540)
- SERIES: Freedom, opportunity and security (60)
- SERIES: Making housing affordable (15)
- Sport (55)
- Technology, start-ups and new media (1)
- Tributes (37)
- Uncategorized (201)
Tag Archives: chemical weapons
JAMES O’NEILL. Scientific evidence exposes the falsity of US government claims about Syrian gas attack.
The irresistible conclusion is that those same senior politicians know that the White House claims are false and misleading and therefore highly dangerous to Australia’s national security. That they should maintain their silence on this while continuing to perpetuate a … Continue reading
Instead of cheering US resort to increasingly robust use of military firepower as the first response to international crises, Western leaders should be ring-fencing Trump’s instinct to reckless behaviour in order to avoid a catastrophe.
The US missile strike on Syria was an act of aggression the consequences of which could be immense. The facts of what happened at Khan Sheikhun must be established.
The 4 April attack on Khan Sheikhun using CW (chemical warfare) weapons was almost certainly the work of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. This is the only explanation which ticks off all the boxes—means, motive and opportunity. The hastily assembled US retaliatory … Continue reading
The use of chemical weapons in Syria and the US air strikes in punishment are part of the continuing descent into lawlessness by various actors with unforeseeable consequences in an already inflamed region.
In recent days, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have made much of their moral repugnance at alleged chemical warfare attacks by the Syrian regime against rebel groups. Their retaliatory missile strikes, if made, would demonstrate that the … Continue reading