Subscribe to our weekly and daily Pearls and Irritations newsletter!
Most viewed recently
- GEOFF RABY. The current mess in Australia/China relations
- STEPHANIE DOWRICK. Would ordaining women save the Catholic Church?
- ERIC HODGENS. Pell and the course that took him to the top
- EMMA ALBERICI. There’s no case for a corporate tax cut when one in five of Australia’s top companies don’t pay it.
- HENRY REYNOLDS. Australia’s perpetual ‘war footing’.
- URI AVNERY. The Day of Shame 23 May 2018
- WENDY HAYHURST. Budget 2018: What happened to affordable housing? 23 May 2018
- PETER PHIBBS. Australian housing policy – going around in circles 23 May 2018
- SUE WAREHAN. How the Australian War Memorial has lost its way. 23 May 2018
- WANNING SUN. Is Anti-China Rhetoric Harming Social Cohesion in Australia? 23 May 2018
- Arts and Reviews (39)
- Defence/Security (758)
- Economy (1,003)
- Education (190)
- Environment and climate (302)
- Health (479)
- Housing (66)
- Human Rights (392)
- Indigenous affairs (58)
- Industrial relations (32)
- Infrastructure (143)
- International Affairs (1,369)
- Asia (123)
- Links (10)
- Media (479)
- NBN (73)
- Politics (2,318)
- Refugees, Immigration (523)
- Religion and Faith (461)
- SERIES: Freedom, opportunity and security (59)
- SERIES: Making housing affordable (15)
- Sport (51)
- Technology, start-ups and new media (1)
- Tributes (35)
- Uncategorized (154)
Tag Archives: chemical weapons
JAMES O’NEILL. Scientific evidence exposes the falsity of US government claims about Syrian gas attack.
The irresistible conclusion is that those same senior politicians know that the White House claims are false and misleading and therefore highly dangerous to Australia’s national security. That they should maintain their silence on this while continuing to perpetuate a … Continue reading
Instead of cheering US resort to increasingly robust use of military firepower as the first response to international crises, Western leaders should be ring-fencing Trump’s instinct to reckless behaviour in order to avoid a catastrophe.
The US missile strike on Syria was an act of aggression the consequences of which could be immense. The facts of what happened at Khan Sheikhun must be established.
The 4 April attack on Khan Sheikhun using CW (chemical warfare) weapons was almost certainly the work of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. This is the only explanation which ticks off all the boxes—means, motive and opportunity. The hastily assembled US retaliatory … Continue reading
The use of chemical weapons in Syria and the US air strikes in punishment are part of the continuing descent into lawlessness by various actors with unforeseeable consequences in an already inflamed region.
In recent days, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have made much of their moral repugnance at alleged chemical warfare attacks by the Syrian regime against rebel groups. Their retaliatory missile strikes, if made, would demonstrate that the … Continue reading