Subscribe to our weekly and daily Pearls and Irritations newsletter!
Most viewed recently
- EMMA ALBERICI. There’s no case for a corporate tax cut when one in five of Australia’s top companies don’t pay it.
- PAUL COLLINS. The Real Crisis of Australian Catholicism.
- MUNGO MacCALLUM. Malcolm Turnbull and Barnaby Joyce
- CHRIS BONOR. The elite schools’ arms race goes nuclear
- ANDREW GLIKSON. The onset of climate tipping points
- GOOD READING AND LISTENING FOR THE WEEKEND … 17 March 2018
- JOHN MENADUE. The ASEAN Summit in Sydney this weekend. 17 March 2018
- TIM LINDSEY and DAVE MCCRAE. Australian-Indonesia: strangers next door 17 March 2018
- NANDINI PANDEY. Rome’s “Empire Without End” and the “Endless” U.S. War on Terror (Replaying the Roman Civil Wars in Reverse Since 9/11) 17 March 2018
- JENNY HOCKING. News release. The Palace Letters. 17 March 2018
- Arts and Reviews (35)
- Defence/Security (722)
- Economy (941)
- Education (181)
- Environment and climate (277)
- Health (452)
- Housing (55)
- Human Rights (378)
- Indigenous affairs (54)
- Industrial relations (32)
- Infrastructure (129)
- International Affairs (1,259)
- Asia (79)
- Links (10)
- Media (462)
- NBN (71)
- Politics (2,221)
- Refugees, Immigration (512)
- Religion and Faith (436)
- SERIES: Freedom, opportunity and security (59)
- SERIES: Making housing affordable (15)
- Sport (43)
- Technology, start-ups and new media (1)
- Tributes (35)
- Uncategorized (123)
Tag Archives: government-and-politics
We are the landlords. The energy companies are tenants. If we had a controlling stake in the business, it would be much easier to ensure the kind of chicanery that has taken place in the past few years was never … Continue reading
Has there ever been a more demoralising time to be Prime Minister? There’s been the expected sniping from the sidelines and the continued calls for the Coalition to shore up its base and prevent leakage to parties like One Nation.
From an economic perspective, it would be far more efficient to eliminate subsidies altogether and to put a price on carbon that reflected its true cost. Private investors then would be able to choose which technology was most efficient.