Subscribe to our weekly and daily Pearls and Irritations newsletter!
Most viewed recently
- JOHN MENADUE. We are paying to protect an industry that no longer exists.
- MUNGO MacCALLUM. The pugnacious potato has done it again.
- PAUL COLLINS. The Best of 2018: The Real Crisis of Australian Catholicism.
- MUNGO MacCALLUM. Kill Bill remains the default option for Scott Morrison.
- MICHELLE PINI. Something stinks in the Coalition and it’s not just dead fish (Independent Australia 17.01.2019)
- BREXIT AND PHILLIP 21 January 2019
- JOHN KERIN. ‘Free Trade’ (sic), Theory and Experience (Part 2) 21 January 2019
- HENRY REYNOLDS. When will it end? 21 January 2019
- DUNCAN GRAHAM When sinking looms, jump. 21 January 2019
- JOHN MENADUE. Private Health Insurance is a con job. Is Labor being conned again? 21 January 2019
- Arts and Reviews (46)
- Defence/Security (866)
- Drug Reform (29)
- Economy (1,186)
- Education (244)
- Environment and climate (417)
- Health (573)
- Housing (79)
- Human Rights (434)
- Indigenous affairs (71)
- Industrial relations (34)
- Infrastructure (190)
- International Affairs (1,832)
- Asia (320)
- Links (10)
- Media (571)
- NBN (77)
- Politics (2,850)
- Refugees, Immigration (609)
- Religion and Faith (578)
- SERIES: Freedom, opportunity and security (60)
- SERIES: Making housing affordable (15)
- Sport (56)
- Technology, start-ups and new media (6)
- Tributes (49)
- Uncategorized (215)
Tag Archives: Peter Whiteford
Despite the evidence that deliberate fraud is a tiny fraction of social security spending, it remains a mainstay of much reporting of welfare in the Australian media. The Daily Telegraph is a repeat offender.
PETER WHITEFORD. The $4.8 trillion dollar question: will an ‘investment approach’ to welfare help the most disadvantaged?
Social Services Minister Christian Porter on Tuesday released a report on the lifetime costs of the social security system for the Australian population, putting it at close to A$4.8 trillion. The report was an initiative of the 2015-16 budget, … Continue reading
The federal government’s largest single ticket spending item – welfare – has failed to rate a mention in the election campaign. It is the $152 billion elephant in the room. It accounts for around 35 per cent of total … Continue reading