China is not a threat: debunking the US narrative
China is not a threat: debunking the US narrative
Percy Allan (dec'd)

China is not a threat: debunking the US narrative

In this series, I explore how US narratives on the ‘China threat’ have become entrenched in Western security communities and how a ‘China threat’ narrative has been constructed by Republicans and Democrats in the United States in an attempt to create a “rally round the flag” effect designed to internally unite a deeply divided America.

I outline seven reasons why China is not a threat, including because China has no imperial legacy, China’s foreign policy is not – like some other states – ultra-nationalist, China has no territorial ambitions, China is not exporting its ideology, China’s obsession is secession, China’s focus is driven above all by economic concerns, and finally, because China’s Military is built for defence, not to threaten others.

A war with China is avoidable because it is not looking for one. But if America isolates China by equating it with Russia, escalates every dispute into a make-or-break issue and recognises Taiwan as a sovereign state, tensions will rise until war seems inevitable. Anti-China hawks already envisage that.

Likewise Australia should stop treating China as its enemy and instead see it for what it is – a rising economic superpower that wants to engage diplomatically and commercially with the world, not ideologically or militarily.

Read the full series below:

**Part 1 ** https://publish.pearlsandirritations.com/why-china-is-not-a-threat-sinophobia-unites-americans/

**Part 2**

Why China is not planning to conquer other nations

Besides settling and securing its borders, China has no claims on other nations. Countries with grandiose territorial ambitions make no secret of them. This second article in a three-part series explores why China is not planning to conquer and occupy any other nation.

**Part 3**

Chinas Military is built for defence, not to threaten others

In the final of this three-part series, I explore why Chinas emphasis on expanding land and naval forces suggests its focus is on defence of its borders and seaborne trade, not offence.


The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.

Percy Allan (dec'd)