Australian democracy is fading fast, with little care on the part of the Coalition and mainstream media or realisation on the part of Labor.
It was John Howard who locked refugees in concentration camps in the desert. It was John Howard who curled his lip and sneered we, meaning himself, will decide who comes to Australia. It was John Howard who incorrectly demonised Indian doctor Mohamed Haneef, with the aid of the AFP, only to see him forced into a humiliating backdown and apology.
It was Howard who refused to recognise the Wik, High Court decision relating to Native Title and ram legislation through parliament to water down the decision. It was Howard who refused to say sorry to Indigenous people for generational suffering and it was Howard who unleashed the ADF on Indigenous people in the Northern Territory in an act of social cleansing known as the Intervention. He went to war with the US in Iraq and Afghanistan in what appeared to be a crusade against Islam.
Howard set the framework for an intolerant and racist Australia which endures to this day. He put in place what might be termed the Howard Regime with the specific aim of making the wealthy wealthier and fostering European supremacy. He inaugurated a raft of terrorism and security laws designed to intimidate and control his fellow Australians as much as to ensure security.
Using the overblown threat of terrorism Howard corralled and controlled the Main Stream Media (MSM) with leaks and releases to tame journalists. Media laws were watered down allowing all but a seat to Murdoch at the Cabinet Table. Labor Prime Ministers, Rudd and Gillard, did not break the mould. They proved to be LNP Light, particularly with respect to the human rights issues of Indigenous Australians, refugees, single mothers, the unemployed and the environment.
Subsequent Coalition prime ministers have all sought, with success, to advance the Howard doctrine. Murdoch has been feted and favoured, through the installation of a second rate NBN and grants to his media organisations. Sport has been used to deflect attention away from politics and Murdoch has assisted. Indigenous Australians and refugees continue to be treated badly and the fossil fuel industry has been the recipient of grants.
There are few who believe Morrison to be a successful Prime Minister; he is seen as motivated by self. The vaccine rollout and provision of stand-alone quarantine facilities attest to a lack of leadership.
Morrison’s inclination is to govern by decree, unfettered by parliamentary process. In this he has been aided by Covid-dictated limited sittings of Parliament, a weak opposition and a Murdoch dominated press which has pushed the ABC to the right.
As a young diplomat, I was posted to South Africa from July 1976 – October 1979. From 1990 – 1993 I ran a program bringing black South Africans to Australia for training and from 2004 I travelled to South Africa in conjunction with the Ifa Lethu Art Foundation, which I established with a former colleague.
South Africa, under Apartheid, was governed by a white cabal of men elected on a restricted whites only franchise. They were cruel, weak, corrupt, entitled bullies, fostering white elitism and wealth. There was a small parliamentary white opposition headed by an ineffectual blow hard who condemned Apartheid but did not favour universal suffrage. Consequently, blacks treated him with contempt, but that was nothing compared to the loathing they felt and expressed for the white Afrikaners in power.
The ruling LNP increasingly resembles the white supremacist Apartheid regime. They have destroyed the relationship with Australia’s largest trading partner, China, to preserve what they call Australian values. It is a call based on incipient racism and one bound to fail, but like Apartheid it is based on a perverse ideology. Australian white supremacy aims to further enrich business leaders, the majority of whom are white men and male-dominated sporting clubs. Abbott and Morrison push the ‘Anzac and the tradition of Gallipoli’ which has the same emotional and ideological hold for right-wing Australians as the ‘Battle of Blood River’ does for Afrikaner xenophobes.
The white opposition in South Africa was weak in numbers and will, they were time servers, energy and sacrifice did not enter their lexicon. Sacrifice was the preserve of black South Africans, just as it is of bush fire and flood victims and welfare recipients, Indigenous people and refugees in Australia.
The white South African regime gutted the State broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Commission (SABC), squeezing it of funds to the point it became compliant and did not report black student protest in Soweto against Apartheid in June 1976. The South African Police (SAP) were subjected to political control and direction. They were willing participants; they supported the ruling white National Party and Apartheid.
Whatever it takes, mixed with retribution, appears to motivate the LNP. Indicators are the secret trial of Bernard Collaery and Witness K. If Morrison gets re-elected expect him to pursue ‘disruptive elements’ that he will claim are harming Australia’s interests and are backed by Chinese money and agents. He will move to consolidate himself in power and render Labor weak and unelectable. Australia could become a one-party state with token opposition.
You may believe this far-fetched, ‘couldn’t happen here mate’, but it can. I have seen it unfold in South Africa, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. It will all be done under the umbrella of a security threat from China and enable the deployment of the considerable arsenal of security legislation already in existence. Australia, like South Africa, will become a pariah state with US backing.
In assessing the capacity of governments to undertake actions inimical to the interests of some if not many of its citizens the character of the main political players need to be assessed; in that regard, the Morrison government does not come off very well, Porter, Hunt and Colbeck being examples.
The leader of the federal Australian Labor Party, Anthony Albanese, looks, sounds and behaves as his South African counterpart, Colin Eglin. He displays no sense of urgency but more importantly, he evinces no understanding of the dangers posed by the ruling LNP regime. He appears not to understand the mentality he is dealing with. He shows little ability to match them blow by blow.
He appears to hold limited sway with so-called swinging voters. He is known to his rusted-on supporters but who else? It cuts no ice to blame a hostile mainstream media. Albanese has to make waves; that’s what leaders do. They say he has a good team, which is true, but as Shorten discovered, election campaigns are won or lost on the leader’s performance. It may surprise Albanese but voters are not interested in the fact that he was brought up in public housing. It sounds like self-pity. He gives the appearance of running a 1980s’ election campaign. Somebody should tell him the times have changed. Canberra is 1930’s Chicago.