"No war in China" campaigners may be foreign agents: NYT
"No war in China" campaigners may be foreign agents: NYT
Nury Vittachi

"No war in China" campaigners may be foreign agents: NYT

Peace groups campaigning against a US war on China might be paid foreign agents, the New York Times alleged.

But the allegation triggered a backlash from readers shocked at what some people are calling a neo-McCarthyist stance. In a separate story, a senior HSBC executive has been forced to apologise after he said that the UK should defend its own interests rather than simply accepting US instructions to harm China. And in a related tale, the EU admits that it made a mistake in accepting vassal status to the US in areas such as technology instead of developing an independent tech ecosystem, like China did.

Watch the full episode from Fridayeverday below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emCI8vN4Us0

The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.

Nury Vittachi

John Menadue

Support our independent media with your donation

Pearls and Irritations leads the way in raising and analysing vital issues often neglected in mainstream media. Your contribution supports our independence and quality commentary on matters importance to Australia and our region.

Donate