PETER DALY. Tackle clericalism first when attempting priesthood reform | National Catholic ReporterAug 16, 2019
In his 2018 “Letter to the People of God,” Pope Francis condemned the sins of sexual abuse and the abuse of power in the church. He linked those sins to clericalism. “To say no to abuse is to say an emphatic no to all forms of clericalism.”
What is clericalism?
The Association of U.S. Catholic Priests put out a white paper on clericalism in June 2019. It defines clericalism is “an expectation, leading to abuses of power, that ordained ministers are better than and should be over everyone else among the People of God.”
In other words: clerics (bishops and priests) are often trained to think they are set apart from and set above everyone else in the church. Their word is not to be questioned. Their behavior is not to be questioned. Their lifestyle is not be questioned. They rule over the church as if they were feudal lords in a feudal society. That is often how they see themselves — lords of the manor, complete with coats of arms, titles of nobility and all the perks that go with “superiority.”
It is not just clerics who are clerical. The laity often foster clericalism by always deferring to “Father” and putting “Father” on a pedestal. Clericalism is experienced in thousands of words and deeds that add up to a “culture” or atmosphere. Clericalism shows itself when:
- Seminarians say they are called to “chalices, not callouses.” (In other words, no physical work.)
- People say, “Nothing is too good for “Father.” Or, “Father never picks up the check.”
- Priests and bishops spend huge amounts of parish and diocesan money on themselves, with no controls. E.g., redecorating the rectory, building a new episcopal residence, taking lavish trips at church expense, or giving lavish gifts to each other with church money.
- When the priest says, “This is my parish. My way or the highway.”
- When 18-year-old college seminarians wear clerical garb to set themselves apart.
- When parents tell their children, “Never question a priest.”
- When people say that “the priests are ‘next to God.’ “
- When bishops prioritize avoiding scandal over protecting victims of abuse by priests.
- When thriving parishes are closed because there is a shortage of priests when there are deacons and lay people readily available to keep the community going.
All those things are symptoms of clericalism. The culture of clericalism can have horrific consequences.
The 2018 Pennsylvania grand jury set up to study clerical sexual abuse gave some egregious examples of priests and bishops who were protected from the consequences of sexual abuse by a “culture” of clericalism. Priests were routinely transferred around to avoid scandal, but nothing was done to warn the people in their new assignments. Priests were returned to ministry after “treatment” in church-run treatment centers that were not professionally staffed or competently run. Even after there was proven abuse and removal from ministry, priests continued to receive financial support while dioceses played hardball with their victims. Confidentiality agreements forced upon victims as part of settlement served only to shield the church from scandal and clerics from the consequences of their actions.
The Pennsylvania grand jury report gave several examples of children being beaten for talking “badly” about a priest when they came forward with their stories of abuse. In one case a girl who told her pastor of a sexual assault on her by another priest in the parish was humiliated in front of her biological father and told to recant that “made up story” of her assault. The grand jury said, “Her father did not believe her and proceeded to drag her home, yelling at her and slapping her along the way. When they finally got home, she was beaten more by her father, this time with a belt so that the belt buckle would strike her.”
So long as a “culture” of clericalism means that parents believe priests over the anguished stories of their own children, it will be very hard to hold priests and bishops accountable.
Even Pope Francis is guilty of this sort of clerical preference for some Vatican insiders. When Australian Cardinal George Pell was convicted of sexual abuse of several boys by the court in Australia, he was allowed to continue as prefect for the economy (the money guy) in the Vatican, pending appeal. One of Pell’s victims had committed suicide. Pell, like former cardinal Theodore McCarrick, was protected by clericalism. He was a member of the most exclusive “old boys” club in the church, the College of Cardinals.
In a way, priests and bishops are also “victims” of clericalism. If clericalism puts us on a pedestal, it also isolates clergy from ordinary friendships. We are always, “Father” or “Your Excellency” and never just Peter or Jim. If clericalism gives the priest and bishop greater control, it also gives them greater responsibility. Having unquestioned “authority” to speak on so many matters also means that priests are expected to have answers beyond their competence.
The Association of U.S. Catholic Priests report also observed, “Clericalism in lay people blocks the necessary feedback that helps keep the Church faithful to the gospel, and it blocks the feedback the ordained need to properly serve the community.”
The laity, the clergy, and the church all suffer from the culture of clericalism. It distorts our human relationships and corrupts the body of Christ.
Worst of all, it is not faithful to the vision of Christ. He calls on us all to be servant leaders, not imperious rulers.
You know how those who exercise authority among the Gentiles lord it over them; their great ones make their importance felt. It cannot be like that with you. Anyone among you who aspires to greatness must serve the rest, and whoever wants to rank first among you must serve the needs of all. Such is the case with the Son of Man who has come not be served by others but to serve, to give his life as ransom for the many (Matthew 20:25-28).
[Fr. Peter Daly is a retired priest of the Washington
Archdiocese and a lawyer. After 31 years of parish service, he now works with
This article was published first in the National Catholic Reporter, Aug 13, 2019.