Premier Gladys Berejiklian needs to call time on her premiership by next month in the hope that her political legacy is in reasonable nick despite her personal reputation being in tatters. As to where it all began? Read on.

As Transport Minister, Treasurer and then Premier, Berejiklian was the hardest working Minister in the Coalition Government. There was not a skerrick of scandal attached to her name. She represented a monumental change from the corruption-riddled days of NSW Labor.

Her timing was exceptionally favourable. It coincided with the arrival of President Donald Trump and a tsunami of ridicule and hatred generated by MeToo, Respect and other chat lines fostered by the US Democratic Party.

Premier Gladys was adopted by Sydney websites committed to the womens movement, feminism and gender-based politics as an antidote to Trumpism. Another tsunami erupted: chat lines supporting Gladys and her pro-developer Coalition government went into over-drive.

Ms Berejiklian grew more powerful. But her relations with women politicians Liberal, National, Green or Independent worsened. Jillian Skinner, Pru Goward, Clover Moore, Katrina Hodgkinson and Patricia Forsythe were treated appallingly, according to some observers.

She surrounded herself with Liberal hacks who covered her in flattery. They kept away the bad news, and only gave her the good news. She loved the bubble they created around her and she became increasingly intolerant of Ministers, civil servants or contractors who stood in her way, whispered the corridors of power.

Her shenanigans with former Liberal minister Daryl Maguire are a tale of colossal misjudgment, secrecy and apparent large-scale corruption, her opponents claim. No one in politics believes she didnt know about Dazzas land deals, which stood to make him (and her) millionaires. She insulted the intelligence of the public by stating she had done nothing wrong.

Im not the only journalist who has called her to account. Top investigative reporters, Adele Ferguson, Michael West, Michael Pascoe and contributors to John Menadues online site, Pearls & Irritations, have practised their craft with splendid professionalism, but I cant say the same about the NSW Parliamentary press gallery or the Murdoch press, which appears to live off press releases and pictures that are supplied in government packages. One day they write that Gladys is on the ropes and her situation is parlous; the next day she is in charge again, decisive and the heroine of the hour.

There is a Shakespearean quality to Empress Glads departure in March (if it is to be so). In Act 1, Scene 2 of the Bards mighty tragedy, Julius Caesar, Caesar and his party are stopped by a soothsayer who calls: Caesar! And Caesar replies: Who calls? Who is it that calls on me? I hear a tongue, shriller than all the music. Speak; Caesar is turnd to hear.

Soothsayer: Beware the ides of March. Caesar: What man is that? Brutus: A soothsayer bids you beware the ideas of March. Caesar: Set him before me; let me see his face. Cassius: Fellow, come from the throng; look upon Caesar. Caesar: What sayst thou to me now? Speak once again. Soothsayer: Beware the ides of March. Caesar: He is a dreamer; let us leave him.

And the conversation closes.

Later in Scene 2, Caesar is speaking to Mark Anthony:

Caesar: Let me have men about me that are fat; Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep onights. Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Mark Anthony: Fear him not, Caesar; hes not dangerous; He is a noble Roman.

Caesar is determined to finish his portrait of Cassius.

Caesar: He reads much; He is a great observer he loves no plays; He hears no music. Seldom he smiles Such men as he be never at hearts ease Whiles they behold a greater than themselves; And therefore are they very dangerous.

They leave and the scene ends

Any similarity between Cassius and her deputy, Dominic Perrottet, is purely Shakespearean. In reality, there is a large field of candidates who want to be chief executive of NSW Inc. However, the NSW Libs are a hollowed-out version of their former selves. Their gene pool of talent is shallow.

Most are in politics for what it can give them, not what they can give the people of NSW. Gladys is a product of this culture; it has infected NSW Labor and the Nationals as well. They seem to be in it for themselves! Its the Liberal way outsource, bring in highly-paid consultants, sack experience, ignore science, make a quid for yourself. Its neo-liberalism at its finest selfish individualism and bugger the rest of us.

Is the Soothsayer correct and will the ides of March herald an assassination outside the chamber and a takeover by Cassius?

_This article has been republished from_Come the Revolution, 5 February, 2021. Click here to read the original article.