Protest rights: diffuse, proscribed and discretionary
Protest rights: diffuse, proscribed and discretionary
Michael Lester,  Anastasia Radiewska

Protest rights: diffuse, proscribed and discretionary

With no formal constitutional provisions or bill of rights the right to protest in Australia relies upon common law judicial interpretations, is heavily politicised and proscribed by governments in legislation, and relies for administration in a highly discretionary manner by police. _

_

In my in depth conversation with Anastasia Radiewska, protest rights campaigner, Australian Democracy Network. We discuss the shortcomings of this unique approach relying heavily on state governments in the context of both the history in Australia of significant and successful protest movements and emerging recent politicisation and divisiveness around issues such as climate, Covid, environment and latterly campus protests and counter protests over the Israel Gaza war.

Listen to the podcast here:

Controversy over campus protests about the Israel Gaza war prompts basic questions about the democratic rights to protest, public assembly and freedom of speech as I discuss in depth with Anastasia Radievska, Australian Democracy Network for  www.rnb.org.au

 

Republished from MIX CLOUD, July 2024

The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.

Michael Lester

Anastasia Radiewska

Please support Pearls and Irritations with your tax deductible donation

This year, Pearls and Irritations has again proven that independent media has never been more essential.
The integrity of our media matters - please support Pearls and Irritations.
For the next month you can make a tax deductible donation through the Australian Cultural Fund. Please click here to donate.