US economic dominance: why we must break free
January 30, 2026
Foreign corporate ownership now dominates Australia’s key industries, draining wealth offshore and limiting democratic control over economic priorities. Reclaiming sovereignty requires a fundamental rethink of ownership and public power.
US corporate dominance of our economy is depriving Australians of the benefit of our abundant resources and denying our government sovereign control over our economy. It’s time to break free.
That we, Australians, live under the military, economic and cultural domination of the United States is a fact of life and to our great disadvantage. Whilst much has been written about the military domination expressed through subservience to the US alliance and embracing its sub-sets – AUKUS and the Force Posture Agreement – less is known of US economic domination and its disastrous impact on our everyday life. But it helps explain why a wealthy country has so many poor, homeless and workers struggling to keep their heads above the financial waters.
Len Fox, in his 1980 book Multinationals take over Australia, detailed the foreign control of various industries: “Motor vehicles 99.8 per cent, oil refining (ownership) 90.8 per cent, basic chemicals 78 per cent, pharmaceuticals 77.8 per cent, transport equipment 54.6 per cent, basic metals 38 per cent, textiles 33.3 per cent, [and] food, beverages, tobacco 33.2 per cent.”
These figures were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) but unfortunately more up-to-date figures are not available from this source as John Howard, treasurer under the Fraser government, stopped the ABS collecting data on foreign ownership in 1978. The figures were becoming an embarrassment at a time when the Fraser Government was encouraging foreign investment.
We are indebted to The Conversation and Clinton Fernandes for more up-to-date information on foreign ownership of industry in Australia, and I quote:
“Right now US corporations eclipse everyone else in their ability to influence our politics, through their investments in Australian stocks.
“Using company ownership data from Bloomberg, I analysed the ownership of Australia’s 20 biggest companies a few days after the 2019 federal election in May. Of those 20, 15 were majority-owned by US-based investors. Three more were at least 25 per cent US-owned.”
The list included: “Commonwealth Bank of Australia, once the “People’s Bank” but following privatisation now 62 per cent US owned. BHP Group, once the “Big Australian” now 73 per cent US owned. Westpac Bank 64 per cent US owned, National Australia Bank 63 per cent US owned, ANZ Bank 54 per cent US owned, Woolworths 66 per cent US owned, Rio Tinto 65 per cent US owned, Westfarmers 56 per cent US owned and so the list goes on.”
“The ASX’s top 20 companies make up close to half of the market capitalisation of the Australian Securities Exchange”.
One might ask how such US economic domination is to the Australian people’s detriment? After all, governments keep telling us that ‘foreign investment’ is a great boon and something we can’t do without.
Decisions about investment and development are made not by the Australian government but in the board rooms of those corporations and most probably overseas. Those decisions are made to maximise profit for their shareholders – their prime responsibility – not in order to meet national priorities for the benefit of the Australian people.
A classic case is the car manufacturing industry. Successive Australian governments allowed and even encouraged, foreign investment and hence ownership until the entire car manufacturing industry was 100 per cent foreign owned. The government lost any control over this industry which was taken out of Australia by its foreign owners when they decided they could make greater profits in a country with lower labour costs. The end of the car industry caused closure in support industries, with the loss of jobs and skills that went with it.
We also lose out because of tax manipulation and so-called “creative accounting”. Clinton Fernandes, in his excellent book, _Island Off the Coast of Asia_ writes: “Recent work by investigative journalist, Michael West and the Tax Justice Network have exposed the myriad ways in which certain corporations get around the tax laws. ExxonMobil, for instance, “paid zero tax on more than $18 billion in income” in 2014-15 although the price of domestic gas went “through the roof”. Figures analysed and released in December 2017 showed Glencore, which operates in commodities industries such as coal, copper, oil and zinc, “managed to exterminate all profit and tax on $22 billion in income”. Shell Australia “paid zero on $4.2 billion in Revenue. Chevron nothing on $2.1 billion, Viva Energy (which bought the petrol stations from Shell), zero tax on $16.8 billion and ExxonMobil not a cent on $6.7 billion.”
In short, one Australian worker paid more tax than five giant US corporations whose combined income in that year was $51.8 billion. The Australian community suffers because of the lost revenue which could otherwise finance much needed infrastructure such as public housing, essential upgrading of public healthcare and addressing the climate crisis.
The clout of the foreign owned mining sector was seen in 2010 when it mounted a very public political campaign opposing Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s proposed resources rental tax which would have improved the income from this sector for the benefit of the Australian people. The ALP buckled under this political pressure, replacing Rudd with Julia Gillard who promptly bowed to the wishes of the foreign owned mineral industry and removed the resources rental tax proposal from further consideration.
The US dominant corporations have put downward pressure on wages and as the following example indicates, their attitude to labour, leaves much to be desired.
“Exxon-Mobil is the biggest global oil and gas monopoly. In 2017 Exxon Mobil workers in Longford (Victoria), went on strike for more than six months, fighting against Exxon Mobil cutting their wages by 30 per cent and worsening working conditions,” explained former trade union organiser Shirley Winton at a recent Melbourne protest rally.
“For six months, in a long and bitter struggle with the oil monopoly, workers set up a 24 hour picket outside Exxon Mobil in Longford in Victoria. They organised and ran the picket themselves and drew wide support from many workers, unions and communities – locally, nationally and internationally.
“The striking Longford workers pointed out that in that same time over three years Exxon Mobil did not pay a cent of corporate taxes while pocketing $25 billion from the plunder of our natural resources and exploitation of workers who create billions in profits sent overseas to its head office in the US.”
Successive Australian governments by the encouragement, even subsidy, of US and other foreign transnationals have allowed them to gain ownership dominance in key industries and so have lost sovereign control of the economy and the ability to set national economic priorities.
The defence against dominant foreign ownership and control is publicly-owned enterprises. But this defence was jettisoned by successive governments when they adopted the policy of privatisation, selling off the Commonwealth Bank, the Australian Defence Industries and many others, and opening up those enterprises to takeover via share buyout.
For a bright and independent future, in which the people of Australia gain the maximum benefit of the country’s bountiful resources, we need to break free of US economic domination. Reversing the privatisation policy, to regain sovereign control through public ownership, is a starting point. IPAN, the Independent and Peaceful Australia Network will be addressing the issue of US dominance and the urgent need to break free at its National Conference in Adelaide this year. It is scheduled for 24-26 July. Register here.