JOHN MENADUE. When will we wake up to the risks as well as the benefits of the US alliance? (Repost)

We are a nation in denial that we are ‘joined at the hip’ to a dangerous ally. Apart from brief isolationist periods, the US has been almost perpetually at war; wars that we have often foolishly been drawn into. The US has subverted and overthrown numerous governments over two centuries. It has a military and business complex, almost a ‘hidden state’, that depends on war for influence and enrichment. It believes in its ‘manifest destiny’ which brings with it an assumed moral superiority which it denies to others

. We are running great risks in committing so much of our future to the US. We must build our security in our own region and not depend so exclusively on a foreign protector.

Unfortunately many of our political,bureaucratic,business and media elites have been so long on an American drip feed that they find it hard to think of the world without an American focus.. We had a similar and dependant view of the UK in the past. That ended in tears in Singapore.

 In this blog over many months and most recently in the last few days (Is war in the American DNA?), I have drawn attention to the risks we run in being ‘joined at the hip’ to a country that is almost always at war. The facts are not disputed. The US has never had a decade without war. Since its founding in 1776 the US has been at war 93% of the time. These wars have extended from its own hemisphere, to the Pacific, to Europe and most recently to the Middle East. The US has launched 201 out of 248 armed conflicts since the end of WWII. In recent decades most of these wars have been unsuccessful. The US maintains 700 military bases or sites around the world including in Australia. In our own region, mainly to contain China and North Korea, it has massive deployment of hardware and troops in Japan, the ROK and Guam.

The US led illegal invasion of Iraq  has resulted, directly and indirectly in the death of  a million people and the displacement of  millions of  people. How can we deny that the US is the most aggressive and dangerous country on our planet.?

The US has been extensively meddling in other countries’ affairs and elections for a century. It tried to change other countries’ interest.governments 72 times during the cold war. Many foreign leaders were assassinated. In the piece reproduced in this blog (The fatal expense of US Imperialism)Professor Jeffrey Sachs said

The scale of US military operations is remarkable. … The US has a long history of using covert and overt means to overthrow governments deemed to be unfriendly to the US. … Historian John Coatsworth counts 41 cases of successful US-led regime change for an overage of one government overthrow by the US every 28 months for centuries”.

The overthrow or interference in foreign governments are diverse, including Honduras, Guatemala, Iran, Haiti, Congo, Indonesia, Japan, Vietnam, Chile, Iraq, Afghanistan and most recently, Syria.

And this interference continued with the undermining of the pro-Russian government in the Ukraine by the US-backed Maidan coup in 2014. Gorbachev and Regan agreed that in allowing the reunification of Germany, NATO would not extend eastwards. But with US encouragement, NATO has now provocatively extended right up to the borders of Russia. Not surprisingly Russia is resisting.

Despite all the evidence of wars and meddling in other countries’ affairs, the American Imperium continues without serious check or query in America or Australia.

I suggest there are several reasons why the American record of war and interference has not been challenged.

The first is what is often described as America’s “manifest destiny”; the God-given right to interfere in other countries’ affairs. This right is not given to others because many Americans see themselves as more virtuous and their system of government better than others.

Despite their assumed world role, many Americans have a limited understanding of other countries’ culture and life. Only 32% of Americans have passports. In the UK and Australia it is 70%. Before he became President, George Bush had only been overseas once. That was to visit Beijing where his father was the Ambassador.

Professor Tom Nichols reported in this blog (How America lost its faith in expertise, and why that matters) Public Policy Polling that revealed that 43% of Republicans and 55% of Democrats supported bombing a place called ‘Agrabah’ which turned out to be a fictional place in a cartoon. Only an ignorant people could presume that their country should bomb a city that did not exist! To this day 70% of registered Republicans doubt that Obama is an American citizen.

The US has invaded countries it knew about and in many cases, cultures and people it knew nothing about, who were assumed to be less virtuous and wise than the US. In examining the failure in Vietnam General Walter T Kerwin Jr observed that ‘we never understood the Vietnamese. We think we know best. We tried to force on them what they should do…’ The ignorance of ordinary America and its politicians, of other countries is legendary but possibly just as important is their resistance to any relief of that ignorance. That may not seem unusual – but it is dangerous for a country with overwhelming military power employed around the globe.

The second reason why the American Imperium continues largely unchecked is the power of what President Eisenhower once called the “military and industrial complex” in the US. In 2018, I would add “politicians” to that complex who depend heavily on funding from powerful arms manufacturers across the country and the “military and civilian personnel” in over 4,000 military facilities . The intelligence community, corporate funding of universities and think-tanks also have a vested interest in the American Imperium.

This complex which co-opts institutions and individuals in Australia, is called by some “the hidden state”. It has enormous influence. No US president nor for that matter any Australian prime minister would likely challenge it.

Australia has locked itself into this complex. Our military and defence leaders are heavily dependent on the US Departments of Defence and State, the CIA and the FBI for advice. But it goes beyond advice. We willingly respond and join the US in disasters like Iraq and the Middle East. While the UN General Assembly votes with large majorities to curb nuclear proliferation, we remain locked in to the position of the US and other nuclear powers.

Our autonomy and independence is also at great risk because our defence/security elites in Canberra have as their holy grail the concept of “interoperability” with the US. This is mirrored in  US official and think-tank commentary on the role they see for us in our region.   So powerful is US influence and our willing cooperation with it that our foreign policies have been largely emasculated and sidelined by the defence and security views of both the US and their acolytes in Australia.

The concept of interoperability does not only mean equipment. It also means personnel where increasingly large numbers of Australian military personnel are embedded in the US military and defence establishments, especially in the Pacific Command in Hawaii.The last US Commander in Hawaii is to be the new US Ambassador in Australia!

The US military and industrial complex and its associates have a vested interest in America being at war and our defence establishment, Department of Defence, ADF, Australian Strategic Policy Institute and others are locked-in American loyalists.

The third reason for the continuing dominance of the American Imperium is the way the US expects others to abide by a “rules-based international order” which was largely determined at Bretton Woods after WWII and embedded in various UN agencies. That ‘order’ reflects the power and views of the dominant countries in the 1940s. It does not recognize legitimate interests of newly-emerging countries like China who now insist on playing a part in an international rules-based order.

The US only follows an international rules-based order when it suits its own interests. It pushes for a rules-based system in the South China Sea while refusing to endorse UNCLOS (Law of the Sea) or accept ICJ decisions. The invasion of Iraq was a classic case of breaking the rules. It was illegal .The resultant death and destruction in Iraq met the criteria for war crimes. But the culprits have gone scot free.

Although quite factual, some may regard the above critique as over-done. I don’t think so. It is obviously discomforting but it is based on the facts.  It restates the obvious. I am also encouraged that many of the harshest and most accurate critics of US policies are Americans who believe that their country should behave more honourably .The problem is that decision-makers and powerful interests in the US, just as in Australia, don’t listen.

It is a myth that democracies like America will behave internationally at a higher level of morality. Countries act in their own interests as they perceive them. We need to discount the noble ideas espoused by Americans on how they run their own country on the domestic front, and look instead at how they consistently treat other countries. Consider how the Kurds are being treated. They led the fight against ISIS but are now abandoned by the US and other ‘allies’. The scrapping of the alliance with them is made the more dishonourable by the emergence of the new version of the US/Saudi alliance with its resulting tragedy in Yemen.

US claims about how well they run their own country are challenged on so many fronts. 43 million US citizens live in poverty, they have a massive prison population with its indelible racist connotations, guns are ubiquitous and they refuse to address the issue. Violence is as American as cherry pie. It is embedded in US behaviour both at home and abroad.

The founding documents of the US inspire Americans and many people throughout the world. “The land of the free and the home of the brave” still has a clarion call. Unfortunately, those core values have often been denied to others. For example, when the Philippines sought US support it was invaded instead. Ho Chi Minh wanted US support for independence but Vietnam was invaded .

Like many democracies, including our own, money and vested interests are corrupting public life.   As some have described it, ‘Democracy’ in the US has been replaced by ‘Donocracy’, with practically no restrictions on funding of elections and political activity for decades. Vested interests (the Washington ‘swamp’) are largely unchecked. House of Representatives electorates are gerrymandered and poor and minority group voters are often excluded from the rolls. The powerful Jewish lobby, supported by fundamentalist Christians, has run US policy off the rails on Israel and the Middle East.

The US has slipped to number 21 as a ‘flawed democracy’ in the Economist’s Intelligence 2016 Democracy Index. (NZ was ranked 4 and Australia 10). It noted that ‘public confidence in government has slumped to historic lows in the US.’ That was before Trump!

Many democracies are in trouble. US democracy is in more trouble than most. There is a pervasive sickness.

 Our risky dependence on the US cannot be avoided or excused by laying problems at the door of Donald Trump. Malcolm Fraser warned us about a  dangerous ally long before Donald Trump came on the scene. US obsession with war and with overthrowing or undermining foreign governments goes back over a century. So does domestic gun violence.

Donald Trump excesses are not likely to  significantly move American policies from what has become the norm over two centuries.

Hugh White has pointed out, the US has in effect now  given up looking after anyone but itself – “America first” – which makes it very dangerous for a country to be joined at the hip with the US, with or without Donald Trump. It could of course be argued that Trump is just being honest and saying what US presidents have always done, looking after their own interests even if they refused to admit it.

A major voice in articulating American extremism and the American Imperium is Fox News and Rupert Murdoch who exert their influence not just in America but also in the UK and Australia. In the media, Fox News supported the invasion of Iraq and is mindless of the terrible consequences. Rupert Murdoch applauded the invasion of Iraq because it would reduce oil prices. Fox and News Corp are leading skeptics on climate change which threatens our planet. News Corp underpins American imperialist intentions. In April last year the New York Times told us that outside the White House, Rupert Murdoch is Trump’s chief adviser.

But it is not just the destructive role of News Corp in US, UK and Australia. Our media, including the ABC and even SBS, is so derivative. Our media seems to regard Australia as an island parked off New York. We are saturated with news, views, entertainment and sit-coms from the US. It is so pervasive and extensive, we don’t recognize it for its very nature. The last thing a fish recognizes is water.

Leigh Sayles on 7.30 recently interviewed Michael Wolff on his book “Fire and Fury”. The book drew attention to the personal absurdities and eccentricities of President Trump. Leigh Sayles did not bother to ask the obvious question “What are the implications for Australia of this strange President?” Amazing! She followed that up more recently with a public relations gush by Greg Norman on his golfing friend Donald Trump.

In this blog recently, Michael Keating “Who will pay for Trump’s wars?”  highlighted that America will have to curb defence spending, despite all the rhetoric about confronting China. Mike Keating described (as Hugh White pointed out) that, based on Australian Treasury figures, by 2030 Chinese GDP is projected to be 70% larger than US GDP. It is already 15 % larger. The US has record debt which the recent tax cuts, like those of Regan and Bush, will only worsen. Current US debt is largely financed by China. Michael Keating asks the obvious question, “Why should China be prepared to finance the US to enter into an arms race with it?” in other words “What country seeks to go to war with its own banker?”

One outcome of the declining comparative US economic power is that the US will ask its allies to do more. We saw the influence of US budgetary pressures in its launch of the pivot to the Pacific. It was designed in part to help the US extricate itself from the Middle East, but also to reduce defence expenses in the budget.

Alternatively, the US may return to its brief periods of isolationism and leave its allies to their own devices. Maybe they will do us a favour!

Despite continual wars, often unsuccessful, the overthrow or subversion of foreign governments and declining US economic influence, US hegemony and domination of Australian thinking continues. Despite all the evidence, why do we continue in denial?

One reason is that as a small, isolated and white community in Asia we have historically sought an outside protector, first the UK and when that failed, the US. We should not bury in Anzackery and its derivatives the enormous price we paid for British ‘protection’. We have not shaken off that dependence and subservience to the UK.

We continue to seek security from our region through a US protector rather than, as Paul Keating put it, security within our own region. Our long-term future depends on cooperation in our region and not reliance on a dangerous and distant ally.

Another reason why we are in denial about the American Imperium, is, as I have described, saturation of our media with US news, views and entertainment. We do not have an independent media . Whatever the US media says about tax cuts for the wealthy, defence or climate change it inevitably gets a good run in our derivative media.

A further reason for the continuing US hegemony in Australian attitudes is the galaxy of Australian opinion leaders who have benefitted from American largesse and support – in the media, politics,  bureaucracy, business, trade unions, universities and think-tanks. Thousands of influential Australians have been co-opted by US money and support in ‘dialogues’, study centers and think tanks. Sam Dastyari is small beer compared with the agents of influence that the US has nourished in Australia for decades.

How long will Australian denial of US policies continue? When will some of us stand up? Are our political leaders right in their assessment that any questioning of the threats posed by our interpretation of the benefits and obligations of the US alliance will lose them an election?

In so far as China is any sort of distant threat it would be much less so if we were not so subservient to the US.

What will we do if the US decides to follow the advice of some of its senior generals and use tactical nuclear weapons in North Korea? Their use would engage the US/Australian facilities in Australia a fact that would not escape the notice of China

An American decision to take such military action in North Korea could expose us to great danger. We would likely know about it only after the attack!

A dangerous ally indeed.

The recent statements by Malcolm Turnbull and Julie Bishop that  they do not see China and Russia as a threat is encouraging but there is no sign that they plan any changes.

In a post in this blog Andrew Bacevich asked “When will American wars have their Harvey Weinstein moment?” He went on “it took a succession of high-profile scandals before America truly woke up to the plague of sexual harassment and assault. How long will it take before the public concludes that they have had enough of wars that don’t work? Here’s hoping it is before our President in a moment of ill temper, unleashes ‘fire and fury’ on the world”.

When will we wake up? How long will our denial continue about our dangerous ally?

 

print
This entry was posted in Defence/Security, International Affairs, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to JOHN MENADUE. When will we wake up to the risks as well as the benefits of the US alliance? (Repost)

  1. Brett Martin says:

    I completely agree with the views expressed here. We Australians and our policy makers seem unable or unwilling to address fully the reality of where we are physically located in the world and what that means for us in the long term. It is a cop out, short-term thinking and, ultimately, unrealistic to rely on the US to “protect” us. So long as we do that, we cruel our prospects of establishing truly deep and respectful relations with our neighbours who understandably have an element of doubt about what we really think about them, about our sincerity and independence of thought, on who’s side and in whose interests we are acting, and where we would stand in the event of a serious dispute.

  2. Simon Warriner says:

    The fact Turnbull and Bishop fail to see China and Russia as threats, or potential threats, outs them for the morons they clearly are. Educated, beyond their natural ability.

    The recent change of Secretary of State, from the relatively conciliatory Tillerson to the very hawkish Pompey or whatever the CIA directors name is as clear a heads up as is likely to be given that a serious war is in the making.

    Keep your children close and teach them how to fake being colourblind. I have a feeling it is a skill they will need, along with growing their own food in a greenhouse, and making do with a lot less. Some very stupid people are about to learn that just because you declare a country a third world petrol station, doesn’t mean it is, especially when your space agency buys it rides into space on that countries rockets.

    What we may be about to witness is as good a demonstration as can ever be given as to why it is important to keep the standards in your education system high and rigidly enforced. While the US military has been perfecting the boondogle and identity politics in the washroom, and the classroom, the the Ruskies have kept their education standards high in the STEM subjects which really matter, mastered hypersonic flight and some very tricky stuff with radio frequency interference and delivered working systems at affordable costs.

    Bismark, on diplomacy. Make a good treaty with Russia. He might have known something. And then there is the one about not marching on Moscow. Napoleon learned that the hard way. So did Hitler, and a few others. The Russians are clearly saying Hitler was the last to be given the opportunity, and that the next force foolish enough to try will be eliminated on the starting line, not on Russian territory. Given what it cost them to stop Hitler in human terms they can hardly be criticized for taking that attitude or for preparing to back it up with action.

    That our internation affairs experts fail to see the massive risk the US is taking in its attempts to encircle and hobble the Russian bear is no surprise. It is an inevitable result of a party political model that progressively excludes anyone who understands the danger of conflicting ones interests. Rinse through enough election cycles and whats left is what we have now got. Fools, knaves and scoundrels.

    Sad, really.

  3. Nick Deane says:

    In response to John Menadue’s pertinent question “When will some of us stand up?”, some of us already are!
    The Independent and Peaceful Australia Network (IPAN) is a functioning network of peace groups from across the country. Amongst other initiatives, IPAN has started a campaign to oust the US marines from Darwin, under the slogan “Give ’em the boot!”. https://www.facebook.com/giveemtheboot2/
    Of course, campaigning to get the US marines out of Darwin will raise all the fundamental question about Australia’s alliance with the US that Menadue mentions in this excellent article.

  4. Well said, John.

    Even if written with a tinge of despair, a prophet voice crying out in a cultural wilderness of distraction and apathy.

    Me too, John. I have been on the road as a full time activist for peace since before 9/11 and the concoction of the Terror War.

    “How long will Australian denial of US policies continue? When will some of us stand up?” you ask?

    Well let’s start with you and i standing up together and see how many come to join us.

    Let’s be seen occupying public space and speaking up and speaking out. Let’s go bear witness to toxic militarism. Let’s go speak truth to power.

    What i propose is a speak out on militarism and military spending under the Australian American Memorial in Blamey Square Russell.

    At a date and time to be agreed. But before Anzac so that we may shift its narrative, even a little, from the glorification of war to its brutal cost in blood and taxes.

    We could promote it on your blog. And mine. And many others.

    Are you up for it, mate?

    I got the PA if you got the time.

Comments are closed.