Michael Edesess

Michael Edesess is an accomplished mathematician and economist with a PhD in pure mathematics in stochastic processes and expertise in the finance, energy, and sustainable development fields. He is chief Investment Strategist of Compendium Finance.

Michael's recent articles

The stock market: an instantaneous referendum

The stock market: an instantaneous referendum

Large movements in the stock market can cause unexpected events beyond it to happen very quickly.

What is an American with TDS to do?

What is an American with TDS to do?

Donald Trump is an awful person and a terrible president. But he may provide an enduring breath of fresh air when it comes to the black/white posturing about freedom versus authoritarianism.

What went wrong on the way to net zero

What went wrong on the way to net zero

The atmosphere at a recent meeting to discuss the results of the 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change was glum, to say the least. It was the result of four delusions that doomed the effort from the start.

What Israel should have done

What Israel should have done

Israel chose the wrong way to deal with its enemies. For a better way, it could have borrowed a leaf from China.

The mistaken conventional wisdom about nuclear energy <links>

The mistaken conventional wisdom about nuclear energy <links>

Recently, three articles have appeared in P&I about nuclear energy, one by Richard Broinowski on 29 August, one by Jim Coombs on 2 September, and a third by Joseph G. Davis on 3 September. All of them are negative about nuclear energy. The negativity in each case is driven by a fundamentally mistaken but widespread belief about nuclear energy safety. I respond here to these articles with a more positive view of nuclear.

The coming theatre of jiu-jitsu international conflict

The coming theatre of jiu-jitsu international conflict

Jiu-jitsu is a martial art in which one leverages one’s opponent’s strength in order to subdue them. It is increasingly likely to become the predominant mode of international conflict in the future. It will deploy the adversary’s greatest strength, its internal network of digital interconnections, as a wrecking ball. It is difficult to know if this will be a less destructive or more destructive form of international combat. We need to think carefully about this.

Who stands for freedom?

Who stands for freedom?

I was recently sent an interesting article titled Who Stands for Freedom by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglitz. The article is a review of the book The Big Myth by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. It raised a fundamental question: Does China have more true freedom than the United States?

America the strong

America the strong

The foundational story of the United States of America is its fight for freedom against tyranny. Every schoolchild learns of how the American revolutionaries fought bravely to be freed from the tyranny of King George III of England. They learn the indomitable freedom fighters heroic sayings, such as Give me liberty or give me death! and I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.

COP27: Investors are the wrong people to address climate change

COP27: Investors are the wrong people to address climate change

The leaders in the creation of the low-carbon infrastructure of the future must be those who will know how to build it, not those whose principal occupation is trading shares on the secondary market. This is why I believe that China, despite its current dependence on coal, is much more likely to achieve its future carbon emission goals than the United States.

The demonisation of China in the US goes on and on

The demonisation of China in the US goes on and on

In a recent exchange in the comments section of a United States media publication that is dedicated to a civil exchange of views and to abjuring the demonisation of differing views that is so common in the US, I found nonetheless a deeply entrenched demonisation of China.

Cognitive dissonance fuels US antipathy to China

Cognitive dissonance fuels US antipathy to China

Cognitive dissonance, occurring when a deeply entrenched belief encounters countervailing facts, can cause the holder of the belief to deny or reinterpret the facts.

<