Mike Gilligan

Dr Mike Gilligan worked for 20 years in defence policy and evaluating military proposals for development, including time in the Pentagon on military balances in Asia.

Mike's recent articles

Is PM Albanese about to amaze Australia?

Is PM Albanese about to amaze Australia?

Amazing? PM Albanese is the first Australian prime minister since John Curtin to push back publicly on our security against a global leader since John Curtin recognised the danger of an exploitative Britain eight decades ago. Curtin acted. Could it be that Albanese just might act too?

The fragility of Australia’s security

The fragility of Australia’s security

This time it’s different. America has detailed plans for Australia to play a role in breaking China. Not unlike the role of Ukraine against Russia. Or countless other parallels. That’s what is in the pipeline for Australia. Decades of war at oscillating levels, designed to drain China, mounted largely by America’s friends in Asia, under supervision.

America preying on our universities

America preying on our universities

The US is exploiting a privileged position in our society with formalised access to powerful means for shaping Australians’ attitudes to security. It purports to be ally and friend, but where’s the respect?

America, We are out of your China fight

America, We are out of your China fight

Australia must leave the China debacle, constructively. In withdrawing from America’s aggression against China, we should offer our diplomacy as a patient bridge between China and the US. That will take time. America will become even more extreme before it considers peaceful coexistence with China. Meanwhile our action will be a moderating influence, as we pick up our own distracted security priorities.

Whither Australia’s war against China ?

Whither Australia’s war against China ?

Those espousing our embrace of America’s war against China start with the assertion that it is China’s aggression and aim for regional hegemony which must be resisted. No doubt China sees that in reverse – America as an overbearing, deeply hostile power perched on the edge of Asia pursuing hegemony at each end of the Eurasian continent. Blustering and freely admitting that it alone is not sufficiently powerful, pressuring “allies” for its ends – ruthlessly demanding more defence expenditure and economic and trade sacrifices. Australia is not alone – ask Japan and the Philippines.

Albanese has a second chance with AUKUS

Albanese has a second chance with AUKUS

Australia is to spend mind-boggling money to weaken its own security. Minister RIchard Marles has released a National Defence Strategy which centres on what he calls “projection”. That is, Australian forces threatening China from China’s surrounding waters. The Albanese Government’s defence policy manufactures grievous risk for Australia. That risk must be understood by the government.

Returning to Australia’s bedrock for security

Returning to Australia’s bedrock for security

Richard Marles’ double-speak knows no bounds. His national strategy is entirely contrived to deliver “projection” for America’s ends, without mentioning that Australia is now merely one cog in the unfolding US war machinery across the periphery of Asia. Which is what Paul Keating is saying.

Walking into war with China: an American trap hidden in plain sight

Walking into war with China: an American trap hidden in plain sight

There is no question that the path to war has been set against Russia and China. Nor is there doubt that the brunt will be borne by US allies, as the US has repeatedly proclaimed its “gratitude” to allies without which its geostrategy would be impossible. The question remaining is when war will require allies to shed blood.

The end of US primacy: facing Australia’s existential security question

The end of US primacy: facing Australia’s existential security question

Nothing Australia does – with or without AUKUS – will make any difference to the collective capacity to either deter or defeat China in the next decade, which is the time frame that counts. That means the only prudent choice for Australia’s military strategy is to prepare to defend ourselves from major powers such as China without American support” - Hugh White.

Australia entrapped in war against China for America

Australia entrapped in war against China for America

The Australian Governments bipartisan planned war on China must dominate the next election. Australias democracy is currently dead to war, and to America. But the ballot box is the only recourse for Australians.

Australian defence: from self-reliance to subsidising US war with China

Australian defence: from self-reliance to subsidising US war with China

Our leaders have rendered us Americas pawn, contractually. Australia has abrogated the right to choose peace with China. Dumbly. Unnecessarily. Deceitfully. For political ends. We once had a leader who put Australias security before the desires of a distant, powerful protector. What is the prospect of chancing upon another of Curtinian quality?

Albaneses fealty to America: Shouldnt we be white hot with rage?

Albaneses fealty to America: Shouldnt we be white hot with rage?

Like Paul Keating, Australians should be angry. Australias security is at risk. No other nation is so foolish, so self- delusional, so divorced from the basics of statecraft, nor so feckless with its citizens' security in pursuit of Americas objectives. Shouldnt we be white hot with rage at this governments abdication of sovereignty?

De-risking Australia: separating our vital interests from Americas

De-risking Australia: separating our vital interests from Americas

Does it really matter that Australias defence policy has no moorings, and is created unaware of past pain, lessons and policy responses? By agents with unknown interests. And that American influence has been ushered into this void, most recently by Minister Marles?

Reclaiming Australias strategic character

Reclaiming Australias strategic character

America feels above any need to explain its calamitous geostrategic actions. Of course, it has no obligation to. But its character is revealed as being comfortable with threat fabrication, on a grand scale. It is practised at making war on false premise. And appears energised by it, not repentant. Deception, including of allies, is integral to its geostrategic armoury.

Labors serial betrayal of Australia

Labors serial betrayal of Australia

Make no mistake, the Albanese government knows that in joining the US fight against China, Australia will be left defenceless on American withdrawal. And only a dodo could not know this risk is high. Maybe the government doesnt appreciate that war for America is different. It is the war which matters, not the result. Winning is incidental.

Wongs two card trick on Australians

Wongs two card trick on Australians

Minister Wongs speech to the National Press Club demonstrates that when she lays her cards on the table they do not present truly. A mathematician would advise to multiply her claims by minus one. Australia is well along on a path to make, not avert, war with China. Peace holds no weight with this government. Australians must count on failed leadership from our leaders, henceforth.

Has the USA captured Australias fourth estate?

Has the USA captured Australias fourth estate?

The uniformly negative reaction of the national press gallery to former PM Paul Keatings views on Australias security raises questions not just of its intellectual adequacy but of whether the media has been captured by and is knowingly serving the United States at Australias expense.

Keating exposes ministerial incompetence in Albanese Government

Keating exposes ministerial incompetence in Albanese Government

Speaking out strongly against AUKUS at the Press Club yesterday, Paul Keatings concern is that Australias security has been laid limp upon the altar of small target politics by the two key Ministers - Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles.

Beyond words: Labors betrayal of Australia

Beyond words: Labors betrayal of Australia

From our Minister for Foreign Affairs Australians must expect ever more duplicity, more smoothing the path to war orchestrated by America, for Americas ends. Its a struggle for words to convey the enormity of what we face. It is beyond our politicians. Australia is being dragged into war. No doubt.

Four dud PMs - geo-strategically barren, unable to identify Australias interests

Four dud PMs - geo-strategically barren, unable to identify Australias interests

The risks for Australia in joining another failed American war, this one contrived to crush China, are worse than even-money, and climbing. The consequences verge on existential.

Americas cruel game with Australia

Americas cruel game with Australia

Australias security policy is a mess. We have been betrayed by our national leaders. Without exception, from Prime Minister Gillard on - with Anthony Albanese shaping up to join - the sell-out to Americas war neurosis is complete. Our leaders have been party to the fabrication of China as a military threat to Australia, by inviting a US military offence against China to settle here and be developed.

Once defence ministers spending fiction and the big sell-out

Once defence ministers spending fiction and the big sell-out

Americas confected strategy to contain China for its own ends has to be separated from Australias self-reliant defence, with clarity. The Strategic Defence Review must staunch the bleeding.

We are useful idiots for the US war industry and its followers in Australia

We are useful idiots for the US war industry and its followers in Australia

America believes that it should run the world unchallenged in all dimensions of statehood.

How defence will ruin Australia

How defence will ruin Australia

China has no interest in attacking Australia. But once America ensconces its B52 strike aircraft at Tindal, Australia perforce becomes a hot target for missile attack. Protection for Tindal will be an imperative, requiring Iron Dome technology, at vast cost without certainty. No financial provision exists for ballistic missile defence at Tindal.

Why Labor cant be trusted with Australias security. It started with US Marines in Darwin

Why Labor cant be trusted with Australias security. It started with US Marines in Darwin

Basing nuclear capable B52 bombers at the Tindal airbase is an abrupt, unambiguous sign that our government believes it is Australias interest for China to feel threatened with American nuclear strike from our soil. At Americas pleasure.

Lets not miss the basics in the Defence Strategic Review

Lets not miss the basics in the Defence Strategic Review

It's time to inter the Hollywood ANZUS which has deceived Australians into believing a US security guarantee is necessary and unquestioningly available should we be attacked.

The Defence Strategic Review: AUKUS is the wrong submarine for Australian needs

The Defence Strategic Review: AUKUS is the wrong submarine for Australian needs

Any new submarine for defending Australia should be built around our experience. Our needs are idiosyncratic. The Defence Strategic Review should find that Australias defence interests would be served only by a new submarine designed for Australias peculiar northern waters. If we cannot have submarines designed for our conditions, the platform should be removed from our force structure.

Defence Strategic Review - Is defending Australia dead?

Defence Strategic Review - Is defending Australia dead?

The last decade of Australias defence policy has swung from successful focus on our own defence, by ourself, to one heavily influenced by the US strategic determination to dominate China militarily. Thereby conservative governments have invited risk to our nation needlessly and been wrong-headed enough to subsidise it.

The Defence Strategic Review: Understanding Australias existing defence capability is critical

The Defence Strategic Review: Understanding Australias existing defence capability is critical

At this time, Australia should be able to rely on its own defence of the nations sea and air approaches, operating from infrastructure here. We have no reason to require US armed intervention for our security. That is a significant milestone coming after some fifty years of single-minded capital and activity programs. An example of tenacious public policy delivering big, complex outcomes.

The Defence Strategic Review: The Hollywood version of ANZUS

The Defence Strategic Review: The Hollywood version of ANZUS

It is highly unlikely that China would threaten Australian territory unless we become enmeshed in containment by the US.

Our Air Force  is already 'operating against China'

Our Air Force is already 'operating against China'

Australia is seemingly as eager as ever to be pushed out on a plank by our American friends, professionally. Ever the faithful patsy.

Australias defence strategic review - facts and fallacies

Australias defence strategic review - facts and fallacies

In preparation for the Defence Strategic Review the government has not informed Australians of any threat which challenges our security, much less a spectrum of them up to most concerning.

Deceiving cabinet colleagues on submarines? Surely not

Deceiving cabinet colleagues on submarines? Surely not

Which Australian Defence Minister convinced the Hawke Cabinet to create a submarine production industry at Port Adelaide with no commercial prospects, its product being of only marginal benefit to our defence, with zero local construction expertise, at extraordinary cost to taxpayers yet available economically elsewhere - while obscuring the finding by his Department that submarines suffer critical limitations in defending Australia?

Our Defence Minister spurns realism, imperilling Australia

Our Defence Minister spurns realism, imperilling Australia

Behind the militarese the professionals know this means that Australia will cough up as much money and forces as necessary to fight China in a high-intensity war on Chinas doorstep.

Its time  for a top-down review of defence

Its time for a top-down review of defence

Labor has a big reputation to protect on defence reform.At historic turning points in Australias security it was mostly Labor governments which turned up and delivered.

Oh, for a Prime Minister honest about Australia's security

Oh, for a Prime Minister honest about Australia's security

How did it come to this? Australias defence policy has been baldly sacrificed to US interests via AUKUS with little public discourse.

<