HAROLD LEVIEN. Our economic downturn

The Government has failed to respond to Australia’s continuing economic downturn despite both increasing unemployment last measured at 720,000 and underemployment of 1.14 million.

Reserve Bank Governor, Philip Lowe, has pleaded with the Government to dump the planned budget surplus and provide fiscal stimulus to revive the economy. Presumably speaking for the Government, Treasurer Frydenberg  has ignored this advice and in two recent ABC interviews with Leigh Sales on 7.30 boasted about the budget heading for a surplus. He and the Government are apparently willing to ignore the serious economic consequences of inaction.

In  desperation, Reserve Bank Governor Lowe has again reduced interest rates in another attempt to spur some economic growth despite past disappointments. If it encourages investors seeking capital gain to purchase more existing homes it will further exacerbate the housing problem for young  home-seekers.

There are only two ways of achieving employment of those seeking work. If the private sector does not respond to reduced interest rates, and the Reserve Bank has now gone beyond what is reasonable, the Government is the only other mechanism available. And the only limit to what the Government can sensibly borrow to expand spending to employ those seeking work is the capacity of the existing infrastructure including the skills retraining facilities such as the Tafes and universities. These borrowed funds are exactly the same the private sector could borrow except the Government also has the back-up of the Reserve Bank.

The Government’s refusal to expand spending is both prolonging the deprivations of over 1.8 million workers and their families and depriving the economy of urgently needed improved social facilities and infrastructure. With record low interest rates, the short-run cost to the budget would be minimal. In the longer run, as the economy recovers, tax revenue increases and payouts to the unemployed are reduced enabling a balanced budget to be restored. It makes no economic sense to prioritise a balanced budget over seeking full employment.

The current substantial downturn in the construction industry offers the Government an ideal opportunity, in cooperation with the States, to solve our housing problem. With the skilled labour now available it could readily commence funding an increase in social housing for the estimated 120,000 homeless. And it could establish, without cost to the budget, a not-for-profit National Public Housing Corporation to help house the many thousands of young people currently in shared housing desperately seeking to buy or rent their home at a reasonable price. Most of their parents purchased housing before the huge escalation in housing prices mainly resulting from negative gearing and reduced capital gains-tax, which encouraged investors to purchase housing for capital gain.

Of course fiscal stimulus could be employed in many other important areas including urgently needed improvements in public schools, restoring funding cuts to the universities, Tafes and scientific research,  expanding and improving public health facilities where waiting times for emergency treatment are often a national disgrace, and especially building essential new dams and pipelines.


Harold Levien writes articles on economic affairs. He founded and edited the monthly current affairs journal Voice, The Australian Independent Monthly many years ago. It is no longer published


This entry was posted in Economy. Consider contributing. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to HAROLD LEVIEN. Our economic downturn

  1. Charles Lowe says:

    Why – oh why – does the Opposition not have the political nous to compare the Governments’ recalcitrance to embrace Keynes with one of the single most forgettable U. S. Presidents – Calvin Coolidge: one term: 1928 -32 and then displaced by one of America’s greatest Presidents: Franklin Delano Roosevelt – he of the ‘New Deal’. (The only President to be elected for more than 2 terms: 4 terms.)

    Labor has a great heritage. Why does it refuse to use it?

    If we don’t have an Opposition, we simply have a dictatorship. Underwritten by Morrison’s assertion on “7.30′, two days before the election: “Who will be responsible for policy?” “I will.”

    Right now Labor is absolutely appalling. On its behaviour, it should not exist.

  2. Marcus L'Estrange says:


    “The key reasons given for the interest rate cut are to kickstart the economy, reduce unemployment to around 4.5% and get inflation up to 2-3%.

    However, there is nothing much the RBA can do to reduce the unemployment figure of ‘officially’ about 5.3% unless it is honest and accept that the real unemployment figure is 15% plus 13% underemployed and has been this way for many years. We would have to have another Industrial Revolution of 200 plus years ago to have any hope of getting to 4.5%.

    The massive understatement of Australia’s monthly unemployment figures for so long has resulted in big distortions and wrong decisions being made by the RBA and governments”.

    Marcus L’Estrange

    St Kilda West, Vic

Comments are closed.