Chinese Australians Or Australian Chinese?

Sep 7, 2018

The Chinese Australian community has been hijacked in the current public debate about the extent of Chinese influence in Australia.  Far-right elements are fanning anti-Asian feelings and there is an upsurge in racism in major cities.  Government leaders now more than ever should affirm the many contributions of the Chinese Australian community.  It is an asset in our relationship with the People’s Republic of China. 

ABC Radio National all last week focussed on China and China-Australia relations, including a sell-out public forum on 30 September entitled Australia-China a complicated friendship. A podcast is available here.

Forum speakers included Lowy Institute Fellow Richard McGregor, whose study of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is widely admired, Chinese community leader Jason Yat-Sen Li, Clive Hamilton, author of the 2017 best seller The Silent Invasion, and myself.  Hamilton claims that the CCP through its United Front Department targets the Chinese Australian community in its aim of subverting the Australian political system.  The Forum discussion was valuable but failed to cover the whole spectrum of the bilateral relationship, including political, economic, cultural, scientific, strategic and people-to-people ties, concentrating overmuch instead on the role of Chinese Australians.

China looms large in our international consciousness and as it exerts more economic and political influence in the region, it will be ever more important.  Its rise has been so rapid that the Australian public is perhaps unprepared for the implications that will be felt in many aspects of our lives.  It is important for Canberra to develop a coherent narrative to explain China’s significance, and Chinese Party and government organs should also be aware of the need to be sensitive and avoid excessive demonstrations of nationalism.  

While maintaining our national security and defending our national values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, we must find ways of improving our relationship with China, promote scientific and cultural cooperation and identify common interests where we can work together to solve local and regional problems such as climate change.  China’s Belt and Road Initiative should be evaluated in a positive light.  Canberra’s “Quad” should be defined as a working-level dialogue and not an anti-China strategic alliance.  To keep sea-lanes open through the South China Sea, we should work with regional countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam rather than with the United States.

The 2016 National Census identified 1.2 million people in Australia as having Chinese ancestry.  This group however comprises people whose direct or ancestral ties may be in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Vietnam or elsewhere in South East Asia, and whose families may have been resident here for several generations, or who have arrived only in the last decade or two.  Within each of these subcategories also there are people of very different political persuasions.  It is misleading to lump them all together and label them “Chinese.”  Unfortunately, Clive Hamilton’s book uses racial profiling and his assertions feed into the anti-Asian propaganda of anti-immigration lobby groups.  This week the inner Sydney suburb of Lilyfield was plastered with posters saying Asians were not welcome and similar signs have appeared this year in other suburbs, in Melbourne and in Canberra.  This is a coordinated campaign as evidenced by the widespread use of a poster, featured here in an SBS story from May this year The Challenging Racism project at Western Sydney University in a national survey has identified a marked increase in racist incidents over the past 18 months.

In this situation, the government needs to condemn racist attacks and take a firm stand against discrimination.  Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull made a positive contribution in his 7 August speech at the University of New South Wales.  It is now incumbent on his replacement Scott Morrison to endorse these views.  At the present time it seems that Chinese investments in Australia are subjected to extra layers of scrutiny and that applications from Chinese to migrate here are more likely to be rejected than from European, American or South Asians. 

Australia is a multicultural society.  Geographically situated in the Indo-Pacific, it is natural that we should have increasing trade, diplomatic and people-to-people ties with our neighbours.  It is not appropriate for us to emphasise our European heritage and rank it as superior to other cultures, which is the agenda of the proposed Ramsay Centre, currently under discussion at the University of Sydney.  Chinese Australians have been here as long as European settlers and have contributed greatly to our national development over the last two hundred years.  We need them now more than ever. 

Jocelyn Chey’s last diplomatic posting was as Australian Consul General to Hong Kong 1992-95.  She was the founding Director of the Australia-China Institute for Arts and Culture, Western Sydney University 2016-17. 

Share and Enjoy !

6 thoughts on “Chinese Australians Or Australian Chinese?

  1. Dr. Chey assertion that the current debate has been hijacked by Hamilton for his anti chinese tone in his new book , there is no ground about it . Yes the debate could cause discomfort but it is because of the Chinese influences in Australia and it has been getting more intensed.

    The solution is to ask the chinese authority and its associates to get off .

    A few years before the Chinese influences started , the Chinese community enjoyed high reputation in the mainstream society , the contained Chinese influences have ruined all these .

    Chun Wing Fan former president of the Australian Chinese Migrants Association

  2. If Prof . Chey awares what has and is now happening in Hongkong , she would have a different understanding about the ccp and its Influences in Chinese communities overseas . Please read some news about Hong Kong
    chun Wing Fan

  3. I have listened to the podcast twice and despite the sensitivity of the debate. the participants, including Clive Hamilton have refrained from engaging in racial politics or fear mongering. Jason Li, from his eloquent statements and coolness has done well in representing the interests of the vast majority of Chinese Australians. The China Panic has awoken most of us, who were taught to accept adverse repercussions as overseas Chinese, to take a serious interests in Australian political activities in terms of political representation in party politics. Chinese Australians can no longer afford to bury their heads in the sand and hope tomorrow will be better. We, together with all Australians should work to ensure Australia remains Multicultural and provide a better future for all our Australian descendants.

  4. Let us never forget the inimitable presence of the ABCs – the Australian Born Chinese – of Darwin. Despite discrimination they are the ultimate Australians since the 1870s when they came here as “cooolie” labourers. Three Darwin Lords Mayor, they are prominent in every aspect of NT society and many of them –men and women – are more Ocker than Paul Hogan

  5. We are at least allowed to discuss the issue of Chinese influence. Try discussing the issue of the influence wielded by a far smaller group, who brag among themselves about their ability to access and influence all major political parties and you will be blocked, called nasty and inaccurate names and be cyber stalked and worse.

    Voltaire commented about precisely that once. Something along the lines of “to understand who rules over you, ask whom you cannot criticize”

  6. I would like firmly to endorse everything Jocelyn Chey says here. These things need to be said, and strongly . Anti-Chinese xenophobia must be challenged or it will eat away at our successful multicultural society. Tony Kevin

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter
Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter

 

Thank you for subscribing!