John Menadue. Farewell to Gough Whitlam, 21 October 2014

Few public figures have left their mark on Australia like Gough Whitlam. I knew him for fifty years. He was the most exciting and challenging public person I have met.  Australians owe him a great debt for giving them new opportunities and linking the aspirations of working people with those of the university educated.

For me two events stood out. The first was his letter to Richard Nixon at Christmas 1972 deploring the bombing of the people of Hanoi and Haiphong. The outrage of the Nixon administration was wonderful to behold. It was great to see that at last an Australian Government had and would express our own views.

The second was the passing of Medibank/Medicare legislation in July 1974 after a double dissolution and a joint sitting of Parliament. That occurred after years of bitter and self-interested opposition by the medical profession. Medibank/Medicare, like the British National Health Service, has well and truly outlived its critics.

After the dull, colonial and sexist years of Menzies, it was exciting to feel that at last Australia was an independent country, proud and confident. There was a sea change in the way we saw ourselves and the way others saw us.

The achievements of the Whitlam Government were legion from ending conscription, recognition of China, needs based funding for all schools, Medibank/Medicare, equal pay and ending British honours. One significant reform which is not often recalled was the abolition of tertiary education fees. Many professional women still remind me of that because, in poor families, often it was only the son who would be sent to university. Gough Whitlam believed that giving educational opportunities to all, particularly women and poor Catholic kids, promoted social mobility and social solidarity. He described education reform as his “most enduring single achievement”. I think Medicare was just as good.

Almost single-handedly he reformed the structure of the ALP to rid it of the “faceless men” who controlled it from outside caucus. After becoming leader of the ALP in 1967 he created an exciting new range of policies that Australians embraced with increasing enthusiasm. Effectively, he wrote the “New Testament” of the ALP.

When reforming the ALP, “crash through or crash”, he was saved several times from expulsion by the support he had in the wider community. His goal was to break the control of union and party officials who had little interest in political power. “Only the impotent are pure” he said! He knew that only the parliamentary leader could break the grip of self-serving officials.

What I found remarkable was his courage and determination to keep going despite the enormous obstacles. I once counselled him against taking too much overseas travel. “Comrade” he said “if I am going to put up with the f…wits in the Labor Party, I’ve got to have my trips”. At the time I thought he was being self-indulgent, but in retrospect I can much better appreciate the pressure he was under from archaic elements of the party.

The Whitlam Governments are criticised for their economic management. There is some merit in this criticism. Too much was attempted too quickly. But after 23 years in opposition that was not surprising. His governments produced one surplus out of three budgets. During their tenure, Australian government net debt was zero, net foreign debt was minimal and domestic savings were at record levels. However, after the first oil shock, our inflation rose higher than in other countries. Wage increases were excessive. Some policies were clearly unwise, but there was never any illegality or bad faith.

Gough Whitlam, like Paul Keating and Kevin Rudd had some testy times with Ministers and Caucus but only Kevin Rudd was to pay a high price for it.

The dismissal of the Whitlam Government had little to do with its performance. Three months after Whitlam’s election victory in December 1972, Senator Withers, the leader of the Liberals in the Senate denied the legitimacy of the Whitlam Government. Withers warned: “the Senate may well be called upon to protect the national interest by exercising its undoubted constitutional power”. He said that the election mandate was ‘dishonest”, that Whitlam’s election was a “temporary electoral insanity” and that to claim that the Government was following the will of the people “would be a dangerous precedent for a democratic country”. More Bills were rejected in the Senate during Whitlam’s three years as Prime Minister than in the 72 years since Federation. Not content just to engineer the dismissal of a democratically elected Government, leading figures set about one after another to deceive the Prime Minister.

Since then, criticism of the Whitlam Government has been largely designed to exculpate those associated with the horrendous dismissal of an elected government. To justify this foul deed, supporters of the coup keep harping on the illegitimacy and incompetence of the Whitlam Government. These supporters will never concede that his government fairly won two elections. Conservatives piously extol the importance of tradition and respect for institutions. They preach about democracy, free elections, the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. But they throw all that aside to hold onto power and privilege. Whitlam was naïve to trust them- as we all were! As more of the secrets of the dismissal are revealed like the clandestine meetings of High Court judges with the Governor General so is Gough Whitlam more and more vindicated.

Gough Whitlam showed that politics does matter and that it can make a difference. We owe him an enormous debt. He showed that reform is hard, but possible, He shaped modern Australia. His vision and hope is still with us.

John Menadue was Private Secretary to Gough Whitlam 1960-67. He was Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet under Gough Whitlam 1974-75.

print
This entry was posted in Politics, Tributes and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to John Menadue. Farewell to Gough Whitlam, 21 October 2014

  1. Michael Faulkner says:

    John,
    Your tribute to this extraordinary Australian has an immediacy because of your close association with him for some years. The article also reveals some unknown or forgotten facts.

    For example, I had forgotten Nixon’s righteous reaction to Gough Whitlam’s statement about the American bombing of HaNoi at the end of 1972, a portend of the growing suspicion of him by the American power elite, through to the 1975 dismissal.

    I have not forgotten the machiavellian resolve of the conservatives in the Senate particularly Reg Withers, to frustrate the Whitlam government’s legislative agenda, but did not realise the number of defeated Bills exceeded defeated the total of Bills in the previous 72 years of national government.

    This fact alone serves to underscore the significant achievements of the Whitlam government in those three years.

    May Gough’s passing give Australians cause to reflect on his vision for Australia, on the very significant changes his government enacted to make this country a better place, and, a renewed and shared resolve to continue to build constructively in the spirit of those changes, albeit in a very different era .

  2. Michael D. Breen says:

    Agreed with Michael Falkner about the value of your article, John. Unfortunately the struggle to reform the Labor party has a long history and a long way to go. Though as Michael says if we can only reflect. I often think it is so unfortunate that people like Gough are not able to read appreciations like these.

  3. Wayne J McMillan says:

    John,
    Thank you for your wonderful tribute for a man who was larger than life and a great Australian. He will be sadly missed!
    Vale Edward Gough Whitlam

  4. Another significant achievement of the Whitlam Government (though it was completed under the Fraser Government) was the Nara Treaty with Japan. That was a difficult negotiation, but finally brought to fruition through hard work, principally in the end by officials. But the inspiration for it lay with Gough Whitlam.

  5. Edward Fido says:

    Well, you not only knew, but were with him in those heady days. He was a giant among Australian politicians: in the big league with Deakin and Curtin. Definitely not a warped, twisted, selfish pygmy soul like so many of our current political elite. He was a man of culture and class: not a Les Patterson. He didn’t adopt a stage ” Ocker” accent to come down to anyone. They threw away the mould. Like Monash and Chifley he was unique.

  6. Col Greene says:

    Thank you John Mendadue for your excellent, true article.
    Whitlam did have a few, though too few, trusted generals along side him.
    You were one of them and your legacy is also recognised.

Comments are closed.