KEVIN PEOPLES. Is the Male Clerical Church Irrelevant?

I first met the clerical God in 1964. I was 27. This was at Springwood, in the Blue Mountains. I met him while hiding away at St. Columba’s seminary. He was not to my liking and we parted in just under three years. Unlike my God, this distant and patrichal God lived somewhere outside his created world.

His clerical followers instructed me in an idealised form of clericalism, although that word was never named. What we knew about such matters we learnt as small children in our Catholic ghetto through a process of osmosis. Priests were special. We trainee-priests were special. We hadn’t chosen this powerful God. He had chosen us. On ordination we would become sacred persons, superior beings, ontologically changed. We would be higher than the angels in Heaven, according to Saint Pius X, one of the main architects of our seminary system.

Pius X’s seminary reforms with their distorted view of religion and human nature led to an exaggerated form of clericalism that dominated the last century and are central to understanding both clerical sexual abuse and the current problems in the church. Bishops, universally, chose to protect their own rather than protect the children of their dioceses. For Pius, the one duty of the faithful was simple enough: to behave like a ‘docile flock’ and ‘follow their pastors’.

My book,Trapped in a Closed World, is not merely about an anachronistic seminary system, but more importantly it describes an unhealthy and psychologically dangerous training system with its flawed notions of priesthood and human nature.

Bursting with testosterone, we young men were Isolated from the rest of the world. My seminary experience was anti-world, anti-human and anti-Christian. With my background in Catholic Action I found the seminary experience alienating.

We were not empowered to be the best we might become. Rather, we were disciplined and trained to be obedient. Incredibly, our future celibate state was never mentioned. Ironically, our future lives as priests was never discussed. We were trained in a vocational vacuum. No priestly practitioners visited the seminary. Work experience in parishes was never organised. We were on trial to see who could tough it out. Wastage was extraordinary. We were forbidden to have personal friends; forbidden to speak to the nine nuns caring for our material needs. Our families were gradually made redundant. We were given a new heavenly mother.

In a shocking sense we were forbidden to love. I suppose we were trained to see who could live alone. Some of us were on the road to narcissism.

My research makes clear that the seminary system, devised by Rome and traced in a direct line back to the 16thcentury, led to many seminarians reaching ordination as psychosexually immature humans. Little better than adult-children, many were unable to form mature relationships; too many found their peers with children. Because of the church’s obsession with misogyny and celibacy, sex and sin, (masturbation rated five pages in some moral text books; rape rated a third of a page; the former was judged to be unnatural, the latter natural), many priests lived (and I quote a world expert, Marie Keenan), ‘sex obsessed lives of terror’.

Sexual abuse in the Catholic Church reached a peak in the 1960s and 1970s, but note this: historically, mandatory celibacy has always been problematic and child abuse in the Catholic Church has a long and dirty history.

My argument is that the causes of clerical sexual abuse have little to do with claims made by recent popes including Francis. What are we to make of his recent comment that child sexual abuse is widespread throughout the community? We are not dealing here with a few ‘bad apples’, i.e. personal weaknesses, private sins, in an otherwise sound organisation; clerical sexual abuse is not the work of Satan, or Original Sin, or the mystery of evil, or homosexuality, or the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

The essential causes of clerical sexual abuse have all to do with clericalism and the sick culture of the institution.

So that you know where I am coming from in what follows, I wish to assert six points.

One, the current clerical institution is incapable of reforming itself.

Two, the institutional church is dysfunctional and hopelessly split at the top.

Three, the clerical church lives now within its own narcissistic self-image, light years removed from the life and message of Jesus.

Four, a paradigm shift in the church is required. The problems are as much theological as administrative. Present structural and governance issues follow naturally from the church’s self-understanding.

Five, faith is a loving relationship, not a set of propositional statements about beliefs.

Six, we are the church. I’m interested in the empowerment of the whole church, the People of God church, the Pilgrim church. I’m more interested in a grass-roots Jesus Movement either within the present structure if that is possible at the local level, or without if necessary. I’m content to let the clerical church get itself out the hole it has dug for itself.

Kevin Peoples

Author of ‘Trapped in a Closed World. Catholic Culture and Sexual Abuse’.


This post kindly provided to us by one of our many occasional contributors.

This entry was posted in Religion and Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to KEVIN PEOPLES. Is the Male Clerical Church Irrelevant?

  1. Avatar Michael William O'Donnell says:

    As a maturing male I was faced with the body given to me by God offering itself for my pleasure and a church telling me that such touching and stimulation was evil and in the top bracket of sin. I did not seek others to ease my needs for pleasure but allowed myself to relieve the urges and experimented with techniques which heightened my experiences. That’s how I dealt with my sexuality. I formed lots of good friendships of both sexes and sought a life of assisting and supporting my fellow humans and vigorously opposing injustice and behavior and ideas that injured or treated humans in a cruel and non Christian fashion. I did four years at the seminary leaving because I saw my role as participating in the world as a civilian. I worked for several years as a youth worker but I was never tempted to engage with them in anything but a friendship and professional way. I met my present wife and we have been together for nearly forty years. I still agree withe the fundamentals of Christianity and have added some Buddhist principles of detachment meditation and the need to be in control of my own mind and body. I am now a lawyer fighting against the punishment model and the introduction of a therapeutic justice model. Good luck my brothers and sisters

  2. Avatar Robert Hazeltine says:

    Thanks, Kevin, how true.
    I’m currently writing up my own different experience of the seminary – the influences I brought to Springwood and Manly and the influence that experience had on the rest of my life. I wanted to re-examine my seminary experience to find a common cause of sex abuse and the somewhat problematic stance on sexuality that the Church finds an affinity with (and I have a thesis). I also wanted to explain the effects on myself of being toss out in 1967 and why a “conservative” seminary you describe produced someone with views at the opposite end of the scale. I’m at the stage where my first draft is shit (Hemingway).
    I was under CIC a celibate from 14 to the time I met my common law wife of 25 years and now celibate again since her passing and, from first hand experience, I think there are deeper reasons for problems with the priesthood than celibacy.
    One thing on the credit side of the ledger, I met some great men who taught us well and who are not given credit like Julian Miller.

  3. Avatar jack callaghan says:

    thanks kevin. how true how true!!!!.To quote the late ted kennedy ,priest and seminarians were kept in short pants!!. Priests were sacked in great haste for sleeping with a woman, however it took in some ,known cases ,fourty years to be sacked for sexually abusing children . How twisted and sick was that. A most appalling instance of clericalism ,misogyny,and indeed ageism was, recently appointed ,(with serve) a/b commensoli’s recent refusal to let an 83yr.old internationally renowned and respected Benedictine NUN Joan Chichester . speak at a catholic education conference in Melbourne . Your first point enumerated is indeed correct mate . I fully support your idea of a Jesus Movement .

Comments are closed.