Nuclear-capable B-52H Stratofortress bombers: a visual guide to identification
Sep 1, 2024
The primary aim of this Nautilus Special Report is to provide robust, authoritative and transparent information for use by governments and their publics in countries that host the B-52H Stratofortress bomber, as to which of the 76 B-52H aircraft in the current (as of mid- 2024) US Air Force active fleet are capable of delivering nuclear weapons, and which can deliver only conventional, non-nuclear weapons.
For the governments and citizens of B-52 host countries, obtaining authoritative and accessible information concerning the introduction of both nuclear-capable delivery platforms and nuclear weapons themselves is essential for responsible decision-making and democratic accountability. To date, there is no systematic, robust and transparent information on either of these matters in the public domain.
The presence of nuclear-capable delivery platforms is a necessary, though obviously not sufficient, requirement for the introduction of long-range strategic nuclear weapons into any given country. If there are no declared policy or legal impediments to introducing nuclear weapons into a given country, hosting nuclear-capable delivery platforms from an allied state amounts to a near proxy for nuclear weapons deployment, and creates the possibility of participation in nuclear-armed operations.
B-52 and B-2 bombers are the only elements of the US nuclear triad regularly and frequently deployed for shorter or longer periods to the territories of allied host countries outside of the United States. While all B-2 Spirit bombers are capable of being armed with both nuclear and conventional weapons, the US Air Force B-52H active fleet consists of a mix of 46 dual-capable and 30 conventional-only aircraft, rendering the strategic implications of their deployment more ambiguous.
Due to the long-standing US policy of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons on board US ships, submarines or aircraft, US-allied governments and their publics are denied the knowledge of whether they are hosting B-52 bombers strictly limited to conventional strategic operations, or hosting dual-capable aircraft that could potentially implicate their country in US nuclear missions.
The challenges of democratic transparency and accountability faced by countries hosting US B-52 strategic bombers is illustrated by contemporary developments in the case of Australia, where plans are underway for the US Air Force to forward-base up to six B-52H aircraft at Tindal Air Force Base in the far north of the country.
Although B-52 bombers, and other US aircraft, already regularly visit Australia, the planned deployment at Tindal AFB will be accompanied by an unprecedented infrastructure expansion project signifying a shift from existing air cooperation arrangements centred on joint training exercises and enhancing interoperability to a focus on strategic operations and potential air combat missions launched from Australian territory, including conceivably nuclear missions.
Although the Australian Government declares a ‘fundamental right to know what activities foreign governments conduct in, through or from Australian territory or national assets’, this assertion of national sovereignty is difficult to reconcile with the apparent willed ignorance that flows from Australia’s ‘understanding of and respect for’ the US doctrine of neither confirming nor denying the presence of nuclear weapons on board US aircraft, including whether the upcoming deployment of B-52 bombers to Tindal AFB will be nuclear- capable or conventional-only.
The Australian case of willed ignorance points to the fact that this study could have been, and should have been, carried out by government agencies of any of the host countries that permit B-52 deployments. Like the Australian government, these governments deny themselves and their citizenry even a minimum degree of transparency regarding the armament capability of US Air Force B-52 bombers that enter into and operate from their national territories, leaving them to rely on what is, finally, an implausible deniability.
Note: Historical and contemporary policy aspects of this study are developed at greater length in two forthcoming Nautilus Special Reports by Vince Scappatura and Richard Tanter:
- B-52s in Australia in the 1980s – US strategic drivers, CINCPAC histories, and the nuclear heterodoxy of Malcolm Fraser
- Undermining Rarotonga: Australia’s new nuclear posture.
Note: the complete Special Report is available in PDF in high resolution (9.2MB) and low resolution (3.2MB). Those files and related materials in the Nuclear-capable B-52H Stratofortress bombers project are available here.
Related materials are available at the Nuclear-capable B-52 Stratofortress Project, Nautilus Institute, Australian Defence Facilities Briefing Book.
The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Nautilus Institute. Readers should note that Nautilus seeks a diversity of views and opinions on significant topics in order to identify common ground.
For more on this topic P&I recommends:
‘They will tell me.’ Malcolm Fraser’s Cold War nuclear heterodoxy and Labor’s willed ignorance today
Vince Scappatura is Sessional Academic in the Macquarie School of Social Sciences at Macquarie University, and author of The US Lobby and Australian Defence Policy, Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 2019.
Contributions to Pearls and Irritations
Your contribution will fund quality independent comment and analysis in Pearls and Irritations
Contribute
