The sight of close to a million dead fish in one of Australias most important waterways may heraldthe end for the Morrison Government.

For this is hardly the first time this Coalition Government, under its various iterations, has spat in the face of Australias precious resources.

For now, however, let’s look at the Murray-Darling disaster and how we got here.

Murray-Darling gross mismanagement

While then Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Agriculture and WaterBarnaby Joycewas busybuilding up his “private”media brand enough to rival the Kardashians, under his watch themanagement of the Murray-Darling Basin was steadily careering out of control.

Back in August2018, theProductivity Commissioncompleted a review of the $13 billionMurray-Darling Basin Plans governanceentitled, ‘Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Five-year assessment’.

The Draft Reportrevealedthe Plan’s absence of transparency,lack of oversight and direction, and that it was lagging well behind schedule and wasting taxpayer dollars:

An immediateimprovement is nevertheless required in two important elements of the Plan.

The development and accreditation of Water Resource Plansisbehind schedule…

Basin Governments should substantially revise the Basin Plan Evaluation Framework and develop a monitoring strategy…

…There are major shortcomings in the current institutional and governance arrangements and these pose a significant risk to successful implementation. Now is the time for Basin governments to do some heavy lifting and provide strategic direction

This is an opportunity to make important “stitch in time” changes to ensure an effective Plan. Failure will be costly for the environment and tax-payers and undermine confidence that the significant investment in the Basin Plan has been worthwhile.

“Ghost water”

It doesn’t appear as though anyof this advice was heeded in the months leading up to the fish kill apocalypse.

As well, serious allegations that Joyce signed off on unsecured water purchases known asghost water transactionsat inflated prices whichprovided large irrigators, such as agribusiness big irrigator and $300 million water portfolio owner,Webster Limited,huge profits remain unanswered.

In June 2017, I_A_published an investigativereportfromMark Zanker,‘The Murray-Darling Basin: Water, markets and money’, which indicated an exorbitant overpayment for water in Tandou andMenindee. It prompted a sharp dressing down and request from the Department of Agriculture that weremove the articleon the grounds it was ‘inaccurate’. Since the Department did not provide any informationabout any of these purportedinaccuracies, even after repeated requests, we did not take down Mark’s meticulously researched article.

The followingexcerpt highlights the vast scale of Murray-Darling water buy-backs:

‘The price of the sale was not mentioned in the media release, but the ABCreportedthat Tandou stated that it would receive $78 million from the transaction.That would be used by Tandou (Webster Limited) to retire debt.

The ABCinterviewedTom Rooney, one of the founding directors of the water broking firmWaterfind Australia, based in Adelaide. He was asked for his assessment of the price paid and whether the deal was a good one for Webster Ltd.Rooney described the deal as a fantastic deal for Webster.The reason for that was that the purchase price paid by the Commonwealth was,roughly, $3,500 per megalitre, whereas the running average price of water in the Lower Darling traded on the water market over recent years was $140 per megalitre. ‘

The following month, in July 2017, an ABC_FourCorners_programprovided further evidence of the extent of Government mismanagement, at both a Federal and NSW State Level,revealing:

’… just two irrigators, Webster and, prominent cottonfarmer Peter Harris, own about 70 per cent of all licenced water in Barwon-Darling.’

_Four Corners_alsorevealedthat, according to the head of theCommonwealth Environmental Water Officeat that time, David Papps:

’… the NSW Government had “legally embodied” increased access to water and “unsustainable irrigation practices”, describing its attitude to the Basin Plan as “openly hostile.”’

Anexcellent op-edin_The Age_by Helen Vivian (March 2018) also supported Mark Zanker’s observations and highlighted the importance of this vital arterial waterway:

‘It’s like a giant neon emergency signal flashing across the four most populous states in the country. Depleted, despoiled, often poisonous and since 2001 frequently dry, the Darling River is an emblem of poor government, mismanagement, greed and anti-democratic activity.

The first of these was the purchase of $34 million of supplementary water rights, described locally as “empty buckets of water”, sold to the Federal Government during the millennium drought in 2008 by Tandou Station, 100 kilometres south-east of Broken Hill and just south of the Menindee Lakes. A further water sale to the Federal Government was made last year by the same station, $78 million for their entire 21,900-megalitre water right and for business readjustment.

As was reported last month, that deal personally negotiated by Barnaby Joyce was at more than twice the market price for water.

Thats $112 million of taxpayer funds to one station, Tandou. Webster Limited has owned Tandou since 2015. The company also owns several large cotton properties upstream at Bourke and Moree.’

Scratching around for something to point his incompetentfingers at after the mass fish deaths disaster, Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources, andMinister Assisting the Prime Minister for Drought Preparation and Response,David Littleproud,blamed it on the drought, calling it a_“natural event”_.

To which aquatic ecosystem expert, ProfessorFran Sheldon,strongly disagreed:

Put simply, ecological evidence shows the Barwon-Darling River is not meant to dry out to disconnected pools even during drought conditions. Water diversions have disrupted the natural balance of wetlands that support massive ecosystems.

The obvious lack of governance and accountabilityprompted even one of the Nationals’ political collaborators, Liberal Party Wagga branch president Colin Taggart, torespond:

The Nats are plagued by scandal, vested with bullies and riddled with incompetence … The one thing they were supposed to be good atwere[sic]looking after farmers and they have failed at that. Look at the management of the Murray-Darling."

Indeed. Back to you then, Littleproud and Joyce.

Prime Minister Morrisontried to arguethat despite the “_devasting ecological event”,_the Government had been “_operating in accordance with scientific evidence”_provided back in 2012 except it has not.

A leaked2012 memofrom Fisheries NSW belies this claim:

‘There appears to have been no consideration of any scientific information on the impact of extraction or changes to the environment that have been detailed in the last decade.’

Follow the money

But all of this,of course, does not mean that anything will change anytime soon and, if past “achievements” are anything to go by, the gross mismanagement of the Murray-Darling Basin, upon which so many livelihoods depend, will continue.

Perhaps the most damning part of this whole sordid, stinking messis best summed up byone little detailaboutthe chief beneficiary of Coalition Government water policy, Webster Limited:

‘Webster, a Tasmanian company, is also one of Australias biggest water traders. Its shareholders includeAustralian Food and Fibre, which is controlled by the Robinson family,a major donor to the National Party.

Michelle Pini is senior editor for Independent Australia.