Chinese geopolitical inroads into central Asia are coming at Russias expense
Chinese geopolitical inroads into central Asia are coming at Russias expense
Pearls and Irritations guest John P Ruehl

Chinese geopolitical inroads into central Asia are coming at Russias expense

At the recent Commonwealth for Independent States (CIS) summitheld on October 14 in Astana, Kazakhstan, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon expressed previously inconceivable remarks.

His publicadmonishment of Russian President Vladimir Putin to treat Central Asian states with more respectshowed the growing confidence of Central Asian leaders amid Russias embroilment in Ukraine and Chinas expanding regional influence.

After coming under Russian imperial rulein the 18th and 19th centuries, five Central Asian statesKazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistanemergedindependent from the Soviet Union in 1991.

While these countries remained heavily dependent on Russia for security, economic, and diplomatic support, China saw an opportunity in their vast resources and potential to facilitate trade across Eurasia. Chinese-backed development and commerce increasedafter the Soviet collapseandexpanded furtherafter the launch of Chinas Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013.

Billions of dollars in investment, access to Chinese goods, and opening up Chinas enormous consumer market allowed Beijing to restructure Central Asian economies. Soviet-era gas pipeline networks, for example, traditionally forced much of the regions natural resources toflow through Russiato access the European market. TheCentral Asia-China pipelineandKazakhstan-China oil pipelineare just some of the newer pipelines built to transport resources to the Chinese market instead.

These developments have added to friction between Central Asian states and Russia.Disputes between Turkmenistan and Russia over gas prices and a mysterious pipeline explosionin 2009 saw Russian gas imports from Turkmenistan decline until they halted completelyin 2016, upending Turkmenistans access to Europe. Turkmenistan redirected much of itssupplyto China for the next three years, before a rapprochement with Moscow in2019saw imports to Russia resume.

This affair demonstrated the economic opportunities China could provide to Central Asian states that were previously dependent on Russia. Competing Chinese and Russian attempts to supply Central Asia with COVID-19 vaccineswas another demonstrationof Beijings multifaceted approach to increasing its regional influence.

Sensing the inevitability of Chinese investment in revolutionising regional economies, the Kremlin announced the Greater Eurasian Partnership in 2015. This partnershipattemptedto integrate the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), which Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are members of, with the BRI. Though this partnership has only beenpartially successful, Putin has sought touse Chinese investment to help develop Russias Far East.

Russias connections to the remainingSoviet political networksandmilitary powerin the region have allowed Moscow to contend with Chinas growing economic edge in Central Asia over the last two decades. But the increasing international pressure on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine has suddenly upset the traditional division of labor between Russia and China in Central Asia. Though still a vital partner to Central Asian states, Russia risks losing greater economic and security ground to China in the coming years.

After cross-border tradebetween the EU and Russia and Belaruswas reduced following Russias invasion of Ukraine, for example,China placed renewed focuson developing the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), or Middle Corridor, of the BRI. Instead of Chinese trade flowing from Russia into Europe, it is increasingly beingtransportedthrough Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Turkey. The newly builtBaku-Tbilisi-Kars (BTK) railway, as well as other projects like theChina-Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan (CKU) railway, will further erode Russias importance to the BRI.

On September 14, 2022, Chinese President Xi Jinping traveled to Kazakhstan on hisfirstforeign trip since the pandemic began. His destination was symbolicthe BRI wasfirst announced by Xi in Kazakhstan in 2013, and the country has fashioned itself as the buckle of the project.

Alongside signing economic deals during his visit in September, Xi vowed to back Kazakhstan in the defence of its independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. This contrasts with Russian political figures who havequestionedthe validity of Kazakhstans statehood in the past,including Putin. Xi then traveled to Uzbekistan toattend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit on September 15 and 16 and signed deals worth $16 billionwith Uzbekistan, dwarfing the $4.6 billion signed between Uzbekistan and Russia.

Chinas auto industryhas also increased its manufacturing presence and share of the market in Central Asia in 2022, as sanctions have hindered Russias production capabilities.

Chinas growing military presence in Central Asia has similarly been a major concern for the Kremlin. Over the last decade, China hasrapidly increased its arms exports to the region. And though China has conducted bilateral military exercises in Central Asiasince 2002in coordination with the SCO,in 2016China held its first antiterrorism exercises with Tajikistan, and held the Cooperation 2019 exercises with Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan, marking the first time their national guard units had trained with China on counterterrorism.

In 2021, Tajikistan also approved the construction of a Chinese-funded military base in the country near its border with Afghanistanthough Chinas focus on Tajikistan is linked more to Afghanistan than to Central Asia as a whole. However, the use of Chinese private military and security companies (PMSCs) inAfrica and the Middle Easthas also led to concern in Moscowthat Chinas PMSCs may expand further across Central Asia.

Moscows strained military situation became evident in September, when Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, both members of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) military alliance, engaged in deadly border clashes. While Russia and the CSTO wereunableto calm hostilities, the leaders of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstanmeton the sidelines of the SCO summit on September 16 to cool tensions.

Nonetheless, several factors inhibit China from eclipsing Russias geopolitical influence in Central Asia. Beijing has typically been hesitant to commit military forces abroad and continues to see the Russian military as an asset against instability in the region.The Russian-led CSTO intervention in Kazakhstan in January 2022 showed the Kremlin was capable of stabilising vulnerable national governments facing social unrest in the region, as well as cementing their authority and international legitimacy.

Russia alsooperatesa military base in Tajikistan, while Kyrgyzstanhostsa Russian military air base. Kazakhstanslarge ethnic Russian minority, meanwhile, holds local economic and political power, and the Kazakh government remainsfearful of a Russian military intervention ostensibly to protect them.

Additionally, Russia retains some economic leverage over Central Asian states. Russia conducts billions of dollars worth oftradewith them annually andmaintains several Soviet legacy projectsthat have bound Central Asia to it, such as common gas and oil pipelines, waterways, railway networks, and electricity grids. Central Asian states also havesome of the largest annual remittance ratesin the world, with the remittances from Russia to Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan accounting forroughly 30 percent of their gross domestic product in 2021.

The Kremlin also has the ability to shape local perceptions of Russia through its dominantmediaandsocial mediachannels in Central Asia. But positive public opinion toward China across the regionsteadily declined between 2017 and 2021for a variety of reasons, especially in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Many Central Asians are concerned over Chinas debt-trap diplomacy, while large numbers of Chinese workers brought in to develop BRI projects in the region have resulted indeadly protests and clashes with locals.

Competition between China and Central Asian states over scarce regional water supplies, as well as Chinas treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, a Turkic-speaking, largely Muslim ethnic group,whosee themselves as culturally and ethnically close to Central Asian nations, have also damaged Chinas ties in the region.

Evidently, Chinas own obstacles and Russias lingering presence in the region have helped sustain the geopolitical balance in Central Asia. But mutual pledges by China and Russia to respect one anothers core interests,most recently repeated in June 2022, have contributed the most to preventing greater agitation in the region. While Beijing and Moscow are destined to compete in Central Asia, careful diplomacy will likely prolong their cautious cooperation.

Ultimately, China remains more concerned withTaiwan, theSouth China Sea, and the broader Asia Pacific region, while Russia is more preoccupied in its eastern and southern regions, most notably Ukraine.

Russia has so far borne the brunt of U.S.-led efforts tocontaintheir foreign policies. But the launch of theU.S.-China trade warin 2018 under former U.S. President Donald Trump marked a serious turn in the U.S.-Chinese relationship, which has continued under President Joe Biden. The Biden administration (as well as the EU) has criticised and sanctioned China over its policies in Xinjiang, and most recently imposed significant technology export controlson China on October 7.

Heightened tensions with the West will draw China and Russia closer together. While Central Asia is where their interests collide the most, Beijing and Moscow will continue to avoid conflict there to focus on pushing back against Western power elsewhere in the world.

This article was produced byGlobetrotter.

First published in COUNTERPUNCH Nov 17, 2022

Pearls and Irritations guest John P Ruehl

John P. Ruehl is an Australian-American journalist living in Washington, D.C. He is a contributing editor to Strategic Policy and a contributor to several other foreign affairs publications. He is currently finishing a book on Russia to be published in 2022.