Technological magic by Morrison and Taylor won’t help in the Australian response to the IPCC report.

Aug 15, 2021

The Australian Government seems to think it can solve climate problems through technological magic . It hides a failure of moral leadership.

The new IPCC report makes a simple argument. We must cut emissions drastically in the next ten years to maintain any climate stability. We cannot have more new coal mines or gas fields, or we must make those new fields produce zero emissions. Even then it may not be enough.

The Australian government’s response has been odd.

The PM started his day by blaming developing countries for the climate problem: “we cannot ignore the fact that the developing world accounts for two thirds of global emissions, and those emissions are rising. That is a stark fact…. Unless we can get the change in the developing countries of the world, then what we’re seeing in these IPCC reports will occur.”

We are not to blame, even if we are among the world’s biggest gas and coal exporters – which is nice.

He continues: “not to say that we should be posing taxes on this, these countries.” Putting tariffs on high per capita emissions countries would affect exports from Australia, and that would not be nice.

His solution to the problem is technological hope: “World history teaches one thing, technology changes everything. That is the game changer…. And, that is why our approach is technology, not taxes, to solving this problem.”

I suspect that world history, if it teaches anything, teaches that societies which fail to recognise their problems collapse.

“[W]hat’s important is that we ensure that the technology breakthroughs that are necessary to transform the world over the next 10, 20 and 30 years are realised.”

The problem with this is simple. Just because we would like a technology that solves all our problems to exist, does not mean it will come to exist; it will come to exist before it is too late to solve the problem; it will work at the scale we need; people will want to use it: it will not be too expensive to use, and; it will not have many unintended and deleterious consequences.

Technology is not magic or wish fulfillment, however much we would like it to be.

People can also resist the technology. For example, if enough people don’t risk taking the Covid vaccine, or the roll out is messed up, the vaccines will not work as well. New forms of covid will develop and people will die.

The Prime Minister insists we will win, because: “Australia has a strong track record of performance, and we intend for that to continue to increase in the years ahead.”

We have a terrible record with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) which is one of the Government’s chosen technologies. Like the rest of the world, we don’t have a working energy generator with CCS installed, and significantly lowering emissions. We have thrown money at the idea, to save coal exports, but the coal industry was not interested.

We do have aspirations that we can beat emissions targets by boosting gas use and without losing any exports of fossil fuels. That is fantasy. Given no one has the CCS to store the greenhouse gases that the gas mining and burning is emitting, we are increasing world emissions.

The PM does point to an important possible truth. That there are people: “who have great anxieties about these changes and what it means for them. Will they have a job? Will their kids have a job? Will their electricity prices go up?”

There are also people who wonder if their houses will burn down again. If they will have enough water for their farms and families. If they can survive days of the heat that we have reached. If they can survive another ‘one in one-hundred-year flood’. If their houses will have high tides running through them. What will happen if another unseasonable storm blows trees and powerlines down and so on. However, these people apparently do not need to be mentioned.

Yes, there is a problem with the costs of adaptation, but you can’t just look at one side of the problem and ignore the other. And you could recognise that jobs, and living without jobs, is affected by more factors than just policies intended to deal with climate change – neoliberal economics for example.

The PM insists he is being non-political, as “focusing on political solutions won’t solve this problem. Focusing on technology solutions will.”

Unfortunately, technology is not separated from politics. The arguments, and ministerial powers, over the New Energy Market shows that. Regulations, tax breaks, subsidies and so on, can support deadly technologies, or hinder those deadly technologies. It is a matter of politics whether we protect fossil fuels or encourage them to die out. Technology is social and is governed by rules, inclinations, rewards, and compulsions, and therefore by politics.

For example, it can be argued that we already have low emissions energy production, we already have low pollution transport, we already have storage. All these could be improved perhaps, but without the politics we could start to cut back polluting energy to the minimum and increase the supply of renewables. Yes, there are problems, but we would be improving technology that already works, and if better technology came along, we could use that as well. That is, if the politics did not get in the way.


The Government depends on imaginary technology for its climate solution. The great thing about imaginary technology is that it can do anything, there are no physical boundaries or limits which cannot be overcome, and there is therefore no need to make any potentially painful changes. Working technology can be ignored. Imaginary technology is reassuring, and does not require any action, so the situation is likely to get worse.

The Government’s policy and evasion would possibly have been fine 50 years ago, but Australia has already experienced a 1.4 degrees temperature rise since 1910, largely due to emissions. We have longer term droughts. We have massive fish kills in rivers, and rivers are drying up. We have wild storms creeping south. We have inland temperatures which are life threatening in the suburbs of Sydney. The great Barrier Reef is dying. We have longer and fiercer bushfire seasons. And we have fossil fuel mining that threatens the water table, and water supplies. Delay is not sensible. the problem is urgent. If we (a relatively prosperous country) won’t make the effort to fix the problem, then who will?

Share and Enjoy !

Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter
Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter


How often?

Thank you for subscribing!

Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter
Subscribe to John Menadue's Newsletter


How often?

Thank you for subscribing!