As 2020 becomes 2021, one thing remains certain. The Australia-US alliance will continue to threaten the peace of the region and Australia’s economic security. Australia seems prepared to gamble on the US maintaining its supremacy.
If anything even remotely like a real threat existed, then the alliance might be a good idea. But since 1951 and ANZUS, Australia has been sending troops and spending billions of dollars in support of a range of aggressive US military adventures. Any objective analysis will show that no threat has ever been evident.
China is the latest confected threat but as a Chinese embassy statement of November 16 said, ‘if you make China the enemy, China will be the enemy.’ Can the world afford to create such an enemy? Trade has been and will continue to be the front line of this growing conflict. As Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of The Global Times bluntly put it, ‘China-Australia relations will hardly pick up, and Australia will continue to pay for its unreasonable China policy.’
Australia’s behaviour has been extraordinary, but it is foolish to think our leaders have acted alone. The government’s belligerent attitude is threatening billions of dollars in trade. Some 30 per cent of our trade is with China. One in every 13 Australian jobs is reliant on our relationship with China. If things continue as they are then the Australian economy will be a smouldering ruin. China will simply trade elsewhere. There are alternative marketplaces for goods currently provided by Australia. There are other primary producers in the world but few markets that need the primary produce that the Australian economy relies upon for survival. It appears to be a suicidal policy, that both sides of politics are happy to accept, but we need to remember the alliance with the USA and the ties that bind.
Capitalist economies rely on trade and on foreign investment. Chinese investment in Australia, even before the new legislation that tightened things even more, is just two per cent. Even if we add Hong Kong to the mix, the total is just 5.7 per cent. The US, on the other hand, accounts for 25.6 per cent of foreign direct investment into Australia. The Americans have never been coy about reminding Australian leaders of this fact.
US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, let it be known in May how the US regarded engagement, on Australia’s part, with China. He suggested that the US might ‘disconnect’ Australia from its telecommunications, military and intelligence networks if Australia made any arrangements with China deemed not in accord with America’s ‘national security interests.’ In other words, play by our rules or else.
Pompeo was speaking to Sky News when he also commented that ‘every nation has its own sovereign right to make decisions for itself, and I suppose Victoria has some rights … but every citizen of Australia should know that every one of those Belt and Road projects needs to be looked at incredibly closely.’ This, of course, is not ‘bullying’ behaviour. Bullying is what China does. The US engages in ‘robust diplomacy’.
US ambassador Arthur Culvahouse saw the need to further clarify things. ‘We have every confidence that Australia, as a close ally and Five Eyes partner, would take every measure necessary to ensure the security of its telecommunications networks.’ The Australian government got the message.
The incoming US president has been equally unambiguous when he let the world and the Asia-Pacific region know that America is ‘back’ and would be leading the world.
Against such a background of hostility and threat, Australia becomes a virtual captive of its relationship with the USA. This alliance has been effectively set in concrete by successive Australian governments since the signing of the ANZUS Treaty. It is most usually considered first and foremost in military terms. It is often used to describe joint defence in times of trouble. Hugh White in his How to Defend Australia makes the point that ‘America has remained our ally for so long because the alliance has cost it very little, and it has helped support America’s leadership in Asia.’
It is a point well worth remembering. America is not about to relinquish its ‘leadership in Asia’ and Australia is being none too subtly reminded of this fact. This by no means suggests that Australian political leaders, be they Coalition or Labor, consider themselves captives to American policy objectives. On the contrary, they are more than willing partners in this one-sided arrangement. However, it remains a fact that to be anything else is to risk the ire of an enormously powerful and not terribly subtle ally.
The seemingly suicidal policy stance of Australia appears to have been carefully weighed up. Whichever way Australia jumps will cause hardship. To appear to be anti-American is to risk investment dollars; nearly 26 per cent of all investment. It also means making an enemy of the most powerful nation on earth. At the same time, it quite possibly means losing billions of dollars in trade with the rising power in the region. While all this plays out, our political leaders talk of acting in our ‘national interest’. It is an absurd claim, but then the notion of states and ‘national’ interest is an absurdity.
Australia seems to have made its decision. It seems prepared to gamble on the US maintaining its supremacy and that it will continue to ‘lead the world’ as Biden put it. The editor-in-chief of The Global Times correctly described Australia’s policy towards China as unreasonable. Tensions between Washington and Beijing will continue to sharpen. US power is threatened, and history shows that a fading power is dangerous. Australia’s commitment to its alliance with the US is ill-chosen but 2021 will see no change in this dangerous alliance.
Dr William Briggs is a political economist. His special areas of interest lie in political theory and international political economy. He has been, variously, a teacher, journalist and political activist.
Contributions to Pearls and Irritations
Your contribution will fund quality independent comment and analysis in Pearls and Irritations
Contribute
