WILLIAM BRIGGS Lessons in how to hate China

In an often-confused world, some things have a ring of certainty. The steady rise in anti-Chinese rhetoric is an example. It is disturbing, and largely baseless, but is becoming one of life’s truisms. This is not to suggest that China is beyond criticism or that its internal politics are in any way defensible. A country that can treat its working class in so poor a fashion, that can ride roughshod over human rights, is difficult to defend. But then, Australia has allowed for a massive casualisation of the workforce and has been more than once criticised by the UN Human Rights Committee for its treatment of indigenous Australians and refugees. Glass houses and all that.

The ramping up of anti-China sentiment has led to fear and anxiety in this country. The annual Lowy survey has seen the proportion of Australians that ‘trust’ China fall from 52 per cent to 32 percent in just one year. Seventy per cent feel that there is too much Chinese investment, 50 per cent believe that China will pose a military threat to Australia in 20 years, and 49 per cent regard ‘foreign interference’ to be a critical threat. Those figures show just how powerful a prolonged political campaign can be. Those statistics were published before the latest round of anti-Chinese propaganda was unleashed.

China has most recently been likened to Nazi Germany by Australian politicians. We have had spy stories and a defector. Just how long Wang Liqiang’s story will run is questionable. The Australian recently commented that “Macquarie University China researcher Adam Ni expressed scepticism about Mr Wang’s story, saying he appeared not to know the names of key Chinese institutions.” Whether he is an ill-informed spy or not is hardly the issue. What is important is that our government, just last year enacted its foreign interference laws. The new laws also saw the establishment of a registry of organisations with ‘foreign’ links. The foreign interference laws are patently anti-democratic. They allow for the prosecution of anyone with links to a ‘foreign’ organisation, along with provisions that target whistle-blowers and investigative journalists.

Recent events are more than a little interesting. Just a fortnight ago, former Trump advisor, Steve Bannon, addressed the Australian Strategic Forum, declaring that people “in Australia need to understand that as the thing [US-China rivalry] goes forward and it evolves from an information and economic war, it is going to be a kinetic [military] war.” He stated that Australians “need to understand that they are the absolute tip of the spear”. Just days later Duncan Lewis, the former head of ASIO, warned of “unprecedented foreign interference” claiming that China was seeking to “take over” Australian politics. And then came Peter Hartcher’s Quarterly Essay, ‘Red Flag: waking up to China’s challenge’.

Within the space of a few days the focus of anti-Chinese sentiment has been ratcheted up to dangerous levels. There is a degree of breathlessness in all of this. The Australian-Chinese community were first accused, by Clive Hamilton, of being potential ‘fifth columnists’ and now they are being urged to effectively spy on each other. The echo of the Stasi and East Germany is easy to hear. But, regardless of the excitement that some in the media and in politics may feel and want to share with us, one, rather big question needs to be asked. What is really going on?

It seems that every time the word China is used, it must be prefaced with the word communist. Putting the two words together in the same sentence is ludicrous. This ‘communist’ regime has an economy that is very close to becoming the world’s largest. It has 285 billionaires with a combined wealth of a trillion dollars and Jack Ma, founder of Alibaba, is the 20th richest man in the world, and as chance might have it, is a member of the Chinese Communist Party! Those who set about to stir up ‘red’ or ‘yellow’ perils know this and know that China is about as ‘communist’ as the United States. The label, however, in creating an atmosphere of fear, is what is important.

Australia trades with China and does so successfully. Australia’s chief ideological ally is the US. There is a lot of talk about balancing these relationships, but the US is not about to allow itself to be relegated from world dominance. Major powers never do. Bannon’s diatribe about the potential for war with China is more than just the opinion of a rather distasteful character. He represents the thinking of a great many in the US and it is reflected in the thinking of many in positions of power here in Australia. Australian Defence Minister, Linda Reynolds, in early November publicly urged the US to play an even greater role in ‘balancing’ China’s presence in the Indo-Pacific region. If push came to shove, then it is clear how Australia would respond, even if that meant destroying the country’s economy in the process.

China ascends. America descends. For too many this is an unpalatable truth, but, short of a war of annihilation, then the rise of a capitalist China and the fall of a capitalist America is pretty much a fait accompli. In the meantime, in a confused world, we can expect the certainty of continuing anti-China rhetoric and we can expect that next year’s Lowy survey will show an even greater fear of China.

Dr William Briggs is a political economist, affiliated with Deakin University. His special interest areas are in the fields of political theory and international political economy.


This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to WILLIAM BRIGGS Lessons in how to hate China

  1. Peter Love says:

    The changing commentary over the last year has been marked. I don’t think this can be attributed to anything China has done.

    I find this to be a refreshing balance.

  2. Colin Cook says:

    Good to get a more balanced analysis of China and its imperatives; we need more such to deepen our understanding of this major power.
    You write, ‘Within the space of a few days the focus of anti-Chinese sentiment has been ratcheted up to dangerous levels. There is a degree of breathlessness in all of this.’ Quite so – and the influence of ASPI in this needs to be examined.
    The Australian Strategic Policy Institute whilst proclaiming to be independent lists its major sponsors as including global arms/warfare conglomerates. Lockheed Martin, SAAB, Northrup Grumman to name a few that are listed ahead their Gold Sponsors; the Australian Government is amongst the Bronze.
    ASPI experts were strongly featured on the ABC TV 4Corners recent program on China, and just last week there were ASPI folk on the Drum on successive days followed , next day, by an ASPI analyst on the ABC News and SBS news with all the usual repeats. That the ABC and SBS draw heavily on such a source is understandable in the light of funding cuts to our public broadcasters but the question of who is paying the piper* needs to be more widely understood.
    Arms suppliers need antagonistic, even bellicose, relations between nations states to maintain their businesses, cash flow and keep their investors happy. These aims are rarely in Australia’s long term interests.

    * The piper’s employer gets to choose the piper before the music starts; he would be an unbelievably foolish fellow to hire a piper whose music he finds distasteful.

  3. Jim KABLE says:

    A Chinese academic mate suggests to me that Wang Liqiang’s story sounds very fuzzy to him – and he knows the Institute at which Mr WANG took his degree. Then there is the secretive push from the shadows by the US to cause foment and trouble in Hong Kong – and here – a swag of headline revelations – all part of the ramping up of public perception that China is the threat to us – nothing about the actions of the US in ramping up those fears – not for us – but to serve their own vested interests. Nothing in this essay which I would wish to argue against – including Dr BRIGGS’ references to the hypocrisy and cruelties in the area of human rights suggesting that finger-pointing is not our own prettiest moment!

Comments are closed.