GRAHAM FREUDENBERG. On race discrimination.

 

Assent by silence made Hitler’s crimes possible.

As Pastor Martin Niemoller wrote:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me – and there was no-one left to speak for me. 

The warning is as relevant as ever. The more we study how the Holocaust happened, the more we must realise how small steps of acceptance, acquiescence, rationalisation, political convenience and expedience, and above all, silence paved the path to hell from 1933 to 1945. For 80 years, we have glossed over the silent acquiescence of countries like the United States, Britain and Australia in the period after Hitler, for so long dismissed as just another ratbag, came to power by legal and constitutional means in Germany in 1933.

Many readers have dismissed my assertion in my book Churchill and Australia that except for Britain’s and Churchill’s stand in 1940:

The British Empire, including Australia, would have been enrolled as an accomplice in Hitler’s crimes.”

I mean it quite specifically – something more than the world’s general complicity in Hitler’s persecution of the German Jews until the Second World War itself provided both the means and the cover for the physical extermination of all the Jews of Europe.

One of Hitler’s pet schemes was to send the German Jews to Madagascar, then a French colony. Remember – the actual physical extermination of the Jews of Europe did not enter Hitler’s public vocabulary until his infamous speech in the Reichstag in January 1939 when he said ‘If the international Jewish conspiracy plunges Europe into another war, the result will be the liquidation of the Jews of Europe’. After the Fall of France in June 1940, the Madagascar project was put back on the Nazi agenda. The way was clear except for the Royal Navy. Vichy France was a willing collaborator, eager to pass anti-Jewish laws as severe as Germany’s, but not yet ready to kill off a community whose contribution to French culture was one of its glories.

This is a key to understanding the Holocaust. In his first years of power, Hitler moved gradually, almost cautiously. His first move was to ban Jews from the public service, on the grounds that, with less than one percent of the total German population, Jews held ten percent of positions in the public service. Most Germans agreed, and the same applied to the medical profession, universities, journalism and banking. “Too many Jews” everybody said. In the pervasive anti-Semitism throughout Europe, these measures barely caused a ripple. And so it went on, step by step. Think about this when you hear calls for the repeal of the Racial Discrimination Act.

There is no doubt whatever that part of the deal Hitler was offering Britain – a guarantee for the survival of the British Empire in exchange for a free hand in Eastern Europe – would have been the cooperation of the Royal Navy in facilitating and assisting the transportation of the Jews of Europe to Madagascar. Indeed it is easy to see how masters of spin like Hitler and Goebbels would have sold this as a humanitarian gesture – actually saving lives – and how the world would have swallowed it, as we copped so much else between 1933 and 1939.

Only Churchill, Britain and the Royal Navy prevented it, until his invasion of Russia gave Hitler a more efficient way to get rid of the Jews of Europe, the Final Solution. So the Madagascar project was abandoned. The margin by which we of the West avoided being his accomplices was as narrow as the margin by which his twin monster of the 20th Century, Stalin (who was planning his own campaign against the Soviet Jews literally to the day of his death in 1953) prevented Hitler from becoming master of Europe in 1942.

If the Madagascar Plan had ever got underway, it is easy enough to see that Australia would have been given a role in the Indian Ocean, as part of Hitler’s offer for his deal with Britain to safeguard the British Empire from his ally Japan. After all, Hitler had no difficulty in forming a pact with his sworn enemy, the Soviet Union, from August 1939 to 22 June 1941. And in a speech to the Reichstag in 1939 Hitler had made great play of the outcome of the Evian Conference of July 1939, called by president Roosevelt to discuss the Jewish refugee question. Not one of the thirty countries represented, including the US or Australia, was willing to increase their quota of Jewish refugees from Germany, (except Columbia on a strictly cash basis). In his Reichstag speech, Hitler gleefully quoted the Australian representative who had said “Australia has no racial problem, and does not intent to import one”.

The shamefulness and stupidity of such a statement by someone purporting to be spokesman for Australia is underlined by the facts about Australia at the time. The Sydney and Melbourne Jewish communities were among the most respected and successful in the world. (There was at least one Jew on the First Fleet). Sir Isaac Isaacs, a member of the Federal Conventions and of the First Commonwealth Parliament, High Court judge since 1906, Chief Justice in 1930, had not long completed his term as the first Australian-born Governor-General.

Sir John Monash had been Commander-in-Chief of the Australian Army Corps in France in 1918. When he died in 1931 he was accorded the biggest funeral Melbourne had ever seen and every foot of the procession route from the War Memorial which he had conceived, just being completed in St Kilda Road, to the Melbourne Synagogue, was lined by ex-servicemen, many in uniform. Roy Rene was far and away the most popular comedian Australia has ever had. Shopping at the Myer Emporium was a Melbourne institution. I like to think that this was the real Australia. With ‘White Australia’ as its basic policy, the Australian representative at the Evian Conference could hardly have made it more clear that Jews were not really Australians. Hitler certainly got the point, and used Western hypocrisy for all it was worth. “Nobody wants them” Hitler gloated.

It is with equal shame that one reads in the 1942 Volume of Documents in Australian Foreign Policy that the Australian Labor Government told the US Government in January 1942 that black American troops would not be welcome in Australia. This, at the time when we were begging the United States to send everything they could to the Pacific theatre. The Americans promptly told us to jump in the Pacific (even though its own army was still racially segregated). Throughout the war, black units were not allowed to take leave north of the Brisbane River. They were never allowed to march in the great processions which were a regular feature of Brisbane life when I was a kid there. Everyone knew this. Everyone shut up about it.

This is the key to my generation of Australians; immensely privileged in a world of incomparable criminality. But all the terrible events since the rise of Hitler in 1933 happened in my lifetime. I do not fall for the fallacy that the Holocaust exorcised anti-Semitism for all times, or removed the scourge of all kinds of racism. Equally, I do not accept that the Holocaust compels us to silence on every aspect of policy or conduct of the Israeli government. And nobody who has lived through the period and studied it can fail to see how racism is at the root of half the avoidable evils of the world. When mixed up with religion it is deadly.

Nor can I forget that there were hundreds of Germans bearing my name, some of them the direct descendants of my own German great grandparents, who must have been involved in one way or another in the criminality of the Nazi era. Hitler could never have risen without their silent acquiescence. When I hear it said that people like Hanson or Katter or Trump are only saying what many really think, I can read the code.

In the countries like the US and Australia which have risen to unprecedented prosperity on the backs of migrants, migration of itself is not a cause of racism. Migration means salvation for millions. And it has been the making of modern Australia. During the Cold War, when communism was our only preoccupation, we courted the Muslims. When White Australia prevailed as official policy until 1973, the Immigration Department began to redefine “ White” to include countries like Lebanon and Egypt, not least because they believed in God. When General Suharto took over in Indonesia, and permitted the killing of a million Chinese, allegedly members of the PKI, the strongest communist party in the Muslim world, Prime Minister Harold Hold commented: “Well, that’s a million less communists we have to worry about”.

Fear, suspicion and hatred of migrants is worked up by people like Hanson when events in their country of origin makes it profitable – in her case, literally.

Except for the aftermath of 9/11, and its exploitation, the wave of refugees called the “boat people” would have taken its place in the perspective of an immigration program which, over 50 years, has coped with over 200,000 a year. We would have had a perfectly manageable spike in the migration figures for a few years. In addition, we have in Australia at the moment, about 800,000 people on Temporary Residence Visas. These are people on “457” visas, working holiday makers and students. The number of migrants coming each year and temporary residents in the country is about one million. The “boat people” like the Vietnamese before them, would have become just another thirty to fifty thousand valuable migrants, interested only in getting on with their new lives. Instead we have Manus and much else, toxic in our national life.

Madagascar and Manus are not parallels. But they are warnings. Madagascar never happened, but it was planned as part of a pattern of events that did happen and which all the world knew were happening. The Nuremberg Laws were no secret. Hitler’s speeches to the Reichstag predicating the extermination of European Jewry “if the Jews plunge the world into another war” were no secret. Manus is happening; we know that it is happening; but we are not allowed to learn, in the name of “national security” exactly what is being done in our name.

We know enough about human nature to know that you cannot herd together 800 young men who have broken no laws, denied their freedom, and more, denied all hope, without terrible consequences. We are knowingly creating 800 unhinged young men with deep and irreparable grievances – the very breeding ground of modern jihadism in the form now causing so much grief, terror, hatred and thirst for vengeance around the world.

This provocation in Australia’s name is supposed to be justified by “national security” and by the vow Rudd made in his political death-throes, promptly supported by Abbott, Turnbull, Morrison and Shorten, that no person who had tried to enter Australia by boat would ever be allowed to defile our sacred soil by a single step upon it. Of course, being politicians, they are bound by their promises.

But what is our excuse for our complicity?

The building of a secular multicultural society is one of the greatest and most difficult endeavours ever undertaken by any country in the modern world. We are largely a derivative society, and this is our one great chance to make an original contribution to the decency and progress of humanity which began to go so badly off the rails with the dreadful catastrophe of 1914-1918. We must not let this priceless opportunity be lost through silent acquiescence in its sabotage. Given our place in our region, itself multiculturalism on a global scale, the success of the Australian project is the key to our survival.

 

Graham Freudenberg AM (born 1934) is an Australian author and political speechwriter who worked in the Australian Labor Party for over forty years. He has written over a thousand speeches for several leaders of the Australian Labor Party at the NSW state and the federal level. These have included Arthur Calwell, Gough Whitlam, Bob Hawke, Neville Wran, Barrie Unsworth, Bob Carr and Simon Crean.  In 1990 he was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia in recognition of his service to journalism, to parliament and to politics.  In 2005 he was inducted as a life member of the NSW ALP.

He is the author of four books to date:  A Certain Grandeur – Gough Whitlam in Politics, Penguin 1977;  A Cause for Power – the Centenary History of the NSW Labor Party, Australian Labor Party, 1991;  A Figure of Speech (autobiography), John Wiley & Sons Australia, 2005; and Churchill and Australia, Pan Macmillan, 2008.  

 

print

This entry was posted in Immigration, Politics, Refugees and asylum seekers and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to GRAHAM FREUDENBERG. On race discrimination.

  1. Max Bourke says:

    A great piece of writing but what would you expect from one of the great craftsmen of our generation.Try to get Bill Shorten to read it!

  2. Michael Faulkner says:

    Thank you Graham Freudenberg for sharing a little of your historical research, and pointing readers to some disquieting international lessons and threads from Australia’s little known history in first half of the 20th century.

    Sadly, one of the defining aspects of contemporary Australian culture is a wilful, highly selective, political and historical amnesia.

    This article works to correct that while at the same time, it demonstrates an immediacy as well, for the era we are living in now.

  3. Ann Tulloh says:

    I’ve never heard of this Madagascar story but don’t doubt it.
    I agree 100% with the problems of grouping men together excluding any hope or decent future. Here in France at Forge-les-Bains the locals are fighting tooth and nail to prevent a place for 80 male clandestines to live. Some of them would be happy if it would have taken in women and kids.

Comments are closed.