ANDREW FARRAN. The fog of the Irish Sea still overhangs Brexit.

The House of Commons vote on 12th June has saved Prime Minister May for another day but has also left open the role Parliament might play in the outcome of the EU negotiations. A (definitive) White Paper on Britain’s negotiating terms can be expected after the European Economic Summit meets later this month.

The fog of the Irish Sea still overhangs Brexit. The narrow vote in the House of Commons on 12th June (324/298 with some from both sides crossing the floor) has saved Prime Minister May for another day – but how much longer? At this point, the only factor in her favour is the fear the ultra Conservatives have of a Labour Government. But for some Brexiters, the cry of “God for England, Harry and St George” is even stronger now if the yoke of the European Union is to be removed totally from its noble back!

The 12 amendments passed earlier by the House of Lords, relating in particular to a Parliamentary veto on the outcome of the Brexit negotiations, were not sustained by the Commons but their purpose to ensure a meaningful opportunity for the Commons to vote up or down on an eventual Brexit settlement remains. It is all about how much of a common and internal market can or will be retained without doing violence to the Brexit objective.

Some argue that treaty making is a prerogative power of the Crown which can be exercised without approval by Parliament. Resorting to this ancient doctrine would be extreme and alienate a good proportion of Parliamentary and public opinion. Many consequential legislative measures could enter a grey area as a result.

From some passing observations on the broader politics of Brexit, there would seem to be a growing mood in Britain to drop the whole thing, now that the damage it is doing and will continue to do to the economy is more widely appreciated. But the two ends of the political spectrum on Brexit are sticking firmly to their positions.

Admittedly Mrs May is in an impossible situation, fighting wars with her backbenchers, with the Labour Party, with her 10 Irish Unionists backers, and with the EU itself. And the loyalty of key Cabinet members cannot be taken for granted either.

In an effort to resolve the Cabinet issues – at the centre of the government’s whole Brexit strategy – members will be summoned to Chequers for a weekend retreat. The objective will be to agree a White Paper defining once and for all the Brexit terms. But this meeting is not to be held before the European Economic Council summit at the end of the month. So the waiting goes on.

With regard to the all-consuming Irish Border question (as Boris Johnson puts it: “The tail wagging the dog”), the government has to placate both Irish governments, the extreme Brexiters, and the EU, and not be in breach of WTO rules. Some novel solutions have been proposed to overcome the land-border problem (i.e. avoiding physical checks as goods and people pass through) – one being a ‘backstop’ arrangement which would keep the two parts of Ireland existing in the EU common market for an indefinite time after Brexit (denounced as a betrayal of Brexit); and another ridiculous suggestion from Jacob Rees-Mogg and his European Research Group (essentially a back-bencher anti-Europe group) where goods would be cleared at the sea ports, rather than at the land border, with the differential tariffs being applied simultaneously – an arrangement that would breach WTO rules against discriminatory treatment (this anyway is one’s imperfect understanding of it, but no one else seems to understand it either, not even Rees-Mogg himself as he tried awkwardly to explain it to a UK radio audience recently).

The Brexit situation will remain as one with more heat than light, at least until the European Economic Council summit late this month and the issue of the government’s (at last) White Paper. It cannot be assumed that the positions of certain other EU members may not change the equation, at last at the margins, between now and then.

As it happens the writer will be in the UK at that time and hopes to be in a position to provide more and better insight into where Brexit may lead, both for the UK and its trading partners in the EU and beyond.

Andrew Farran is a former diplomat, law academic and trade policy adviser.

print

This entry was posted in International Affairs. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to ANDREW FARRAN. The fog of the Irish Sea still overhangs Brexit.

  1. Peter Small says:

    Having lived and worked for a short while in Northern Ireland in 1966 and then staying with friends in Ballymena the night of the British General Election last June, it would seem Ireland presents a considerable challenge for Brexit. The fragile peace in Ireland is held together with the “Good Friday Agreement”. The key aspect of this is that Westminster must treat Sein Fein and the Democratic Unionist Party, (DUP) equally.
    To gain the majority to form Government, Teresa May needed the support of the 10 DUP members. Finally a deal was done with Westminster putting $2.5 billion on the table for Northern Ireland. To my knowledge there has been no announcement as to how this $2.5 billion is to be spent. Certainly Sein Fein will be watching intently to ensure the “Good Friday Agreement” isn’t violated.
    I understand that a five point plan that would ensure the support of both the DUP and the Sein Fein for which the $2.5 billion could be used as “oil” to make the various parts work are:
    1. A porous border between the North and the South.
    2. Airport tax for both the north and the south of 12.5 %.
    3. A VAT tax of 5 % in both the north and the south.
    4. Corporate tax the same in the north as the south.
    5. An amnesty for all soldiers in respect to the “troubles”.
    If Sein Fein can achieve a resolution of some or all of these issues it will have gone a long way to achieving a United Ireland, (their key ambition) without ever having to occupy a seat in Westminster. Something they recoil from doing as I understand they refuse to swear allegiance to the British Monarch!

Comments are closed.